All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 07/18 v2] ftrace: Add selftest to check if RCU unsafe functions are filtered properly
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 01:11:24 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130831051701.613445493@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20130831051117.884125230@goodmis.org

[-- Attachment #1: 0007-ftrace-Add-selftest-to-check-if-RCU-unsafe-functions.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4528 bytes --]

From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Add a boot time start up test that has a RCU safe ftrace_ops as well
as an unsafe one. Make sure the RCU safe ops can trace RCU unsafe
functions while the unsafe ftrace_ops can not.

Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 kernel/trace/trace.h                  |    2 +
 kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c         |   94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/trace/trace_selftest_dynamic.c |    7 +++
 3 files changed, 103 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.h b/kernel/trace/trace.h
index 502fed7..3578be6 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.h
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.h
@@ -648,6 +648,8 @@ extern unsigned long ftrace_update_tot_cnt;
 extern int DYN_FTRACE_TEST_NAME(void);
 #define DYN_FTRACE_TEST_NAME2 trace_selftest_dynamic_test_func2
 extern int DYN_FTRACE_TEST_NAME2(void);
+#define DYN_FTRACE_TEST_RCU_UNSAFE trace_selftest_dynamic_test_rcu_unsafe
+extern int DYN_FTRACE_TEST_RCU_UNSAFE(void);
 
 extern bool ring_buffer_expanded;
 extern bool tracing_selftest_disabled;
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c b/kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c
index a7329b7..eeacb47 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c
@@ -185,6 +185,97 @@ static void reset_counts(void)
 	trace_selftest_test_dyn_cnt = 0;
 }
 
+static struct ftrace_ops ftrace_rcu_safe_ops = {
+	.func		= trace_selftest_test_probe1_func,
+	.flags		= FTRACE_OPS_FL_RECURSION_SAFE | FTRACE_OPS_FL_RCU_SAFE,
+};
+
+static struct ftrace_ops ftrace_rcu_unsafe_ops = {
+	.func		= trace_selftest_test_probe2_func,
+	.flags		= FTRACE_OPS_FL_RECURSION_SAFE,
+};
+
+static int test_rcu_safe_unsafe(void)
+{
+	int save_ftrace_enabled = ftrace_enabled;
+	char *func_name;
+	int len;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	printk(KERN_CONT "PASSED\n");
+	pr_info("Testing ftrace rcu safe unsafe: ");
+
+	ftrace_enabled = 1;
+
+	trace_selftest_test_probe1_cnt = 0;
+	trace_selftest_test_probe2_cnt = 0;
+
+	func_name = "*" __stringify(DYN_FTRACE_TEST_RCU_UNSAFE);
+	len = strlen(func_name);
+
+	ftrace_set_filter(&ftrace_rcu_safe_ops, func_name, len, 1);
+	ftrace_set_filter(&ftrace_rcu_unsafe_ops, func_name, len, 1);
+
+	/* Do single registrations first */
+	register_ftrace_function(&ftrace_rcu_safe_ops);
+
+	DYN_FTRACE_TEST_RCU_UNSAFE();
+
+	unregister_ftrace_function(&ftrace_rcu_safe_ops);
+
+	if (trace_selftest_test_probe1_cnt != 1) {
+		printk(KERN_CONT "rcu_safe expected 1 call but had %d ",
+		       trace_selftest_test_probe1_cnt);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	register_ftrace_function(&ftrace_rcu_unsafe_ops);
+
+	DYN_FTRACE_TEST_RCU_UNSAFE();
+
+	unregister_ftrace_function(&ftrace_rcu_unsafe_ops);
+
+	if (trace_selftest_test_probe2_cnt != 0) {
+		printk(KERN_CONT "rcu_safe expected 0 calls but had %d ",
+		       trace_selftest_test_probe2_cnt);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	/* Run both together, which uses the list op */
+
+	trace_selftest_test_probe1_cnt = 0;
+	trace_selftest_test_probe2_cnt = 0;
+
+	register_ftrace_function(&ftrace_rcu_safe_ops);
+	register_ftrace_function(&ftrace_rcu_unsafe_ops);
+
+	DYN_FTRACE_TEST_RCU_UNSAFE();
+	DYN_FTRACE_TEST_RCU_UNSAFE();
+	DYN_FTRACE_TEST_RCU_UNSAFE();
+
+	unregister_ftrace_function(&ftrace_rcu_unsafe_ops);
+	unregister_ftrace_function(&ftrace_rcu_safe_ops);
+
+
+	if (trace_selftest_test_probe1_cnt != 3) {
+		printk(KERN_CONT "rcu_safe expected 3 calls but had %d ",
+		       trace_selftest_test_probe1_cnt);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	if (trace_selftest_test_probe2_cnt != 0) {
+		printk(KERN_CONT "rcu_safe expected 0 calls but had %d ",
+		       trace_selftest_test_probe2_cnt);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	ret = 0;
+ out:
+	ftrace_enabled = save_ftrace_enabled;
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static int trace_selftest_ops(int cnt)
 {
 	int save_ftrace_enabled = ftrace_enabled;
@@ -401,6 +492,9 @@ int trace_selftest_startup_dynamic_tracing(struct tracer *trace,
 	if (!ret)
 		ret = trace_selftest_ops(2);
 
+	if (!ret)
+		ret = test_rcu_safe_unsafe();
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_selftest_dynamic.c b/kernel/trace/trace_selftest_dynamic.c
index b4c475a..5eefa56 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_selftest_dynamic.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_selftest_dynamic.c
@@ -11,3 +11,10 @@ int DYN_FTRACE_TEST_NAME2(void)
 	/* used to call mcount */
 	return 0;
 }
+
+int trace_selftest_dynamic_test_rcu_unsafe(void)
+{
+	/* used to call mcount */
+	return 0;
+}
+FTRACE_UNSAFE_RCU(trace_selftest_dynamic_test_rcu_unsafe);
-- 
1.7.10.4



  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-08-31  5:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-31  5:11 [RFC][PATCH 00/18 v2] ftrace/rcu: Handle unsafe RCU functions and ftrace callbacks Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31  5:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/18 v2] ftrace: Add hash list to save RCU unsafe functions Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 19:28   ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-03 21:15   ` Steven Rostedt
2013-09-03 22:18     ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-03 23:57       ` Steven Rostedt
2013-09-04  0:18         ` Steven Rostedt
2013-09-04  1:11           ` [RFC][PATCH 19/18] ftrace: Print a message when the rcu checker is disabled Steven Rostedt
2013-09-04  1:25             ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-04  1:24         ` [RFC][PATCH 01/18 v2] ftrace: Add hash list to save RCU unsafe functions Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-04  1:51           ` Steven Rostedt
2013-09-04  1:56             ` Steven Rostedt
2013-09-04  2:01           ` Steven Rostedt
2013-09-04  2:03             ` Steven Rostedt
2013-09-04  4:18               ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-04 11:50                 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-09-04  4:12             ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31  5:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/18 v2] ftrace: Do not set ftrace records for unsafe RCU when not allowed Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 19:29   ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31  5:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/18 v2] ftrace: Set ftrace internal function tracing RCU safe Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 19:30   ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31 19:44   ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-03 13:22     ` Steven Rostedt
2013-09-03 13:54       ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31  5:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/18 v2] ftrace: Add test for ops against unsafe RCU functions in callback Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 19:45   ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31  5:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/18 v2] ftrace: Do not display non safe RCU functions in available_filter_functions Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 19:46   ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31 20:35     ` Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 20:54       ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-03 13:26         ` Steven Rostedt
2013-09-03 13:54           ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31  5:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/18 v2] ftrace: Add rcu_unsafe_filter_functions file Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 19:46   ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31  5:11 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2013-08-31 19:47   ` [RFC][PATCH 07/18 v2] ftrace: Add selftest to check if RCU unsafe functions are filtered properly Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31  5:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/18 v2] ftrace/rcu: Do not trace debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled() Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 19:21   ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31 20:31     ` Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31  5:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/18 v2] ftrace: Fix a slight race in modifying what function callback gets traced Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31  5:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/18 v2] ftrace: Create a RCU unsafe checker Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 19:49   ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31  5:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/18 v2] ftrace: Adde infrastructure to stop RCU unsafe checker from checking Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 19:52   ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31 20:40     ` Steven Rostedt
2013-09-03 13:43     ` Steven Rostedt
2013-09-03 15:22       ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31  5:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 12/18 v2] ftrace: Disable RCU unsafe checker when function graph is enabled Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 19:55   ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31 20:42     ` Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 20:58       ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31  5:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 13/18 v2] ftrace: Disable the RCU unsafe checker when irqsoff " Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 19:58   ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31  5:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 14/18 v2] ftrace/lockdep: Have the RCU lockdep splat show what function triggered Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 19:59   ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-05 19:18   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-09-05 19:52     ` Steven Rostedt
2013-09-06 12:57       ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-06 13:16         ` Steven Rostedt
2013-09-05 19:35   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-09-05 20:27     ` Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31  5:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 15/18 v2] ftrace/rcu: Mark functions that are RCU unsafe Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 20:00   ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31 20:43     ` Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 20:54       ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31  5:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 16/18 v2] rcu/irq/x86: " Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 20:01   ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31  5:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 17/18 v2] ftrace/cpuidle/x86: " Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 11:07   ` Wysocki, Rafael J
2013-08-31 20:02   ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-09-04  0:16   ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-31  5:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 18/18 v2] ftrace/sched: " Steven Rostedt
2013-08-31 20:01   ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-08-31 15:50 ` [RFC][PATCH 00/18 v2] ftrace/rcu: Handle unsafe RCU functions and ftrace callbacks Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130831051701.613445493@goodmis.org \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.