From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] KVM changes for 3.12
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 12:18:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130904101826.GA2744@ulmo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130903121046.GE22899@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1209 bytes --]
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 03:10:46PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
[...]
> Aneesh Kumar K.V (5):
> mm/cma: Move dma contiguous changes into a seperate config
Hi Gleb,
This commit is going to cause runtime regressions on various ARM
platforms because it renames a symbol but fails to update all default
configurations that select the symbol. A quick grep shows that three ARM
platforms are affected:
$ git grep CONFIG_CMA=y
arch/arm/configs/keystone_defconfig:CONFIG_CMA=y
arch/arm/configs/omap2plus_defconfig:CONFIG_CMA=y
arch/arm/configs/tegra_defconfig:CONFIG_CMA=y
I've been digging around a bit and it seems like the original patch from
Aneesh had the defconfig changes but they were dropped because they "...
require separate handling to avoid pointless merge conflicts."[0]
While I can't speak for Keystone or OMAP, at least on Tegra this causes
issues because we use CMA for framebuffer allocation. Since we only have
CMA selected but not the new DMA_CMA, large DMA allocations will fail.
Can we have the defconfig changes added back to this patch, please? I
suspect that Linus can handle any resulting merge conflicts.
Thierry
[0]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mm/102707
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-04 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-03 12:10 [GIT PULL] KVM changes for 3.12 Gleb Natapov
2013-09-04 10:18 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2013-09-04 10:38 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-09-04 18:12 ` Stephen Warren
2013-09-05 1:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-09-05 5:53 ` Heiko Carstens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130904101826.GA2744@ulmo \
--to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.