From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] KVM changes for 3.12
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 13:38:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130904103855.GC7402@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130904101826.GA2744@ulmo>
Copying Marek, Aneesh and Alex since this came through PPC kvm tree.
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 12:18:28PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 03:10:46PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> [...]
> > Aneesh Kumar K.V (5):
> > mm/cma: Move dma contiguous changes into a seperate config
>
> Hi Gleb,
>
> This commit is going to cause runtime regressions on various ARM
> platforms because it renames a symbol but fails to update all default
> configurations that select the symbol. A quick grep shows that three ARM
> platforms are affected:
>
> $ git grep CONFIG_CMA=y
> arch/arm/configs/keystone_defconfig:CONFIG_CMA=y
> arch/arm/configs/omap2plus_defconfig:CONFIG_CMA=y
> arch/arm/configs/tegra_defconfig:CONFIG_CMA=y
>
> I've been digging around a bit and it seems like the original patch from
> Aneesh had the defconfig changes but they were dropped because they "...
> require separate handling to avoid pointless merge conflicts."[0]
>
Marek, that's your words. What do you think about ARM problem?
> While I can't speak for Keystone or OMAP, at least on Tegra this causes
> issues because we use CMA for framebuffer allocation. Since we only have
> CMA selected but not the new DMA_CMA, large DMA allocations will fail.
>
Make config suppose to ask you about new option though, does it?
> Can we have the defconfig changes added back to this patch, please? I
> suspect that Linus can handle any resulting merge conflicts.
>
> Thierry
>
> [0]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mm/102707
--
Gleb.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-04 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-03 12:10 [GIT PULL] KVM changes for 3.12 Gleb Natapov
2013-09-04 10:18 ` Thierry Reding
2013-09-04 10:38 ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2013-09-04 18:12 ` Stephen Warren
2013-09-05 1:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-09-05 5:53 ` Heiko Carstens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130904103855.GC7402@redhat.com \
--to=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.