All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Chandramouleeswaran, Aswin" <aswin@hp.com>,
	"Norton, Scott J" <scott.norton@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dcache: Translating dentry into pathname without taking rename_lock
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 20:43:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130904194341.GL13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52278AEC.2020307@hp.com>

On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 03:33:00PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:

> I have thought about that. But if a d_move() is going on, the string
> in the buffer will be discarded as the sequence number will change.
> So whether or not it have embedded null byte shouldn't matter. That
> is why I didn't add code to do byte-by-byte copy at this first
> patch. I can add code to do that if you think it is safer to do so.

Sigh...  Junk in the output is not an issue; reading from invalid address
is, since you might not survive to the sequence number check.  Again,
if p is an address returned by kmalloc(size, ...), dereferencing p + offset
is not safe unless offset is less than size.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-04 19:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-04 19:05 [PATCH] dcache: Translating dentry into pathname without taking rename_lock Waiman Long
2013-09-04 19:11 ` Al Viro
2013-09-04 19:33   ` Waiman Long
2013-09-04 19:43     ` Al Viro [this message]
2013-09-05  1:55       ` Waiman Long
2013-09-05  2:42         ` Al Viro
     [not found]   ` <CA+55aFwW+hWwQd8+NgukSidHbf2bnd6QO0yKK9NAgX+9rt0cOQ@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]     ` <5227E321.4090008@hp.com>
2013-09-05  2:48       ` Linus Torvalds
2013-09-05  4:20         ` Al Viro
2013-09-04 19:26 ` Waiman Long
2013-09-04 20:40   ` John Stoffel
2013-09-05  2:04     ` Waiman Long
2013-09-05 13:29       ` John Stoffel
2013-09-05 17:28         ` Waiman Long
2013-09-04 21:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-09-05  2:17   ` Waiman Long
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-09-05  4:30 George Spelvin
2013-09-05 17:06 ` Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130904194341.GL13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=aswin@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=waiman.long@hp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.