From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Chandramouleeswaran, Aswin" <aswin@hp.com>,
"Norton, Scott J" <scott.norton@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dcache: Translating dentry into pathname without taking rename_lock
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 21:55:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5227E49F.1090809@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130904194341.GL13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On 09/04/2013 03:43 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 03:33:00PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>
>> I have thought about that. But if a d_move() is going on, the string
>> in the buffer will be discarded as the sequence number will change.
>> So whether or not it have embedded null byte shouldn't matter. That
>> is why I didn't add code to do byte-by-byte copy at this first
>> patch. I can add code to do that if you think it is safer to do so.
> Sigh... Junk in the output is not an issue; reading from invalid address
> is, since you might not survive to the sequence number check. Again,
> if p is an address returned by kmalloc(size, ...), dereferencing p + offset
> is not safe unless offset is less than size.
Yeah, I understand that. As said in my reply to Linus, I will use
memchr() to see if there is null byte within the specified length. If
one is found, I will assume the string is not valid and return error to
the caller.
Longman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-05 1:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-04 19:05 [PATCH] dcache: Translating dentry into pathname without taking rename_lock Waiman Long
2013-09-04 19:11 ` Al Viro
2013-09-04 19:33 ` Waiman Long
2013-09-04 19:43 ` Al Viro
2013-09-05 1:55 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2013-09-05 2:42 ` Al Viro
[not found] ` <CA+55aFwW+hWwQd8+NgukSidHbf2bnd6QO0yKK9NAgX+9rt0cOQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <5227E321.4090008@hp.com>
2013-09-05 2:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-09-05 4:20 ` Al Viro
2013-09-04 19:26 ` Waiman Long
2013-09-04 20:40 ` John Stoffel
2013-09-05 2:04 ` Waiman Long
2013-09-05 13:29 ` John Stoffel
2013-09-05 17:28 ` Waiman Long
2013-09-04 21:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-09-05 2:17 ` Waiman Long
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-09-05 4:30 George Spelvin
2013-09-05 17:06 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5227E49F.1090809@hp.com \
--to=waiman.long@hp.com \
--cc=aswin@hp.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.