All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@amd.com>,
	Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com
Subject: Re: Ping: [PATCH 0/4] HVM: produce better binary code
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 08:58:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130905075829.GA63530@ocelot.phlegethon.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5228544E02000078000F0AC6@nat28.tlf.novell.com>

At 08:52 +0100 on 05 Sep (1378371134), Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 04.09.13 at 18:30, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org> wrote:
> > I'm not certain, on a modern CPU, whether it's better to issue a series
> > of PUSHes or a series of %rsp-relative MOVs and a SUB.
> 
> When I did the push/pop -> mov conversion for the non-HVM code
> I did some measurements, with the result that the sequence of
> moves was never slower but sometimes (usually on older CPUs)
> faster.

Ah, excellent!

Tim.

      reply	other threads:[~2013-09-05  7:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-23 13:58 [PATCH 0/4] HVM: produce better binary code Jan Beulich
2013-08-23 14:01 ` [PATCH 1/4] VMX: streamline entry.S code Jan Beulich
2013-08-26 10:44   ` Andrew Cooper
2013-08-26 11:01     ` Jan Beulich
2013-08-26 11:48       ` Andrew Cooper
2013-08-26 13:12         ` Jan Beulich
2013-08-26 13:22           ` Andrew Cooper
2013-08-29 11:01   ` Tim Deegan
2013-08-29 12:35     ` Jan Beulich
2013-08-23 14:02 ` [PATCH 2/4] VMX: move various uses of UD2 out of fast paths Jan Beulich
2013-08-23 22:06   ` Andrew Cooper
2013-08-26  8:50     ` Jan Beulich
2013-08-26  9:07       ` Andrew Cooper
2013-08-26  8:58     ` [PATCH v2 " Jan Beulich
2013-08-26  9:09       ` Andrew Cooper
2013-08-29 11:08       ` Tim Deegan
2013-08-23 14:03 ` [PATCH 3/4] VMX: use proper instruction mnemonics if assembler supports them Jan Beulich
2013-08-24 22:18   ` Andrew Cooper
2013-08-26  9:06     ` Jan Beulich
2013-08-26  9:25       ` Andrew Cooper
2013-08-26  9:41         ` Jan Beulich
2013-08-26 10:18         ` [PATCH v3 " Jan Beulich
2013-08-26 13:05           ` Andrew Cooper
2013-08-26 13:20             ` Jan Beulich
2013-08-26 14:03             ` [PATCH v4 " Jan Beulich
2013-08-26 14:18               ` Andrew Cooper
2013-08-26 14:29                 ` Jan Beulich
2013-08-26 15:07                   ` Andrew Cooper
2013-08-26 15:10                     ` Andrew Cooper
2013-08-26 15:30                       ` Jan Beulich
2013-08-26 15:29                     ` Jan Beulich
2013-08-26 15:33                       ` Andrew Cooper
2013-08-26 15:31                 ` [PATCH v5 " Jan Beulich
2013-08-26 15:36                   ` Andrew Cooper
2013-08-29 11:47                   ` Tim Deegan
2013-08-29 12:30                     ` Jan Beulich
2013-08-29 13:11                       ` Tim Deegan
2013-08-29 13:27                         ` Jan Beulich
2013-08-29 14:02                           ` Tim Deegan
2013-08-29 12:45                     ` Jan Beulich
2013-08-29 13:19                       ` Tim Deegan
2013-08-26  9:03   ` [PATCH v2 " Jan Beulich
2013-08-23 14:04 ` [PATCH 4/4] SVM: streamline entry.S code Jan Beulich
2013-08-26 16:20   ` Andrew Cooper
2013-08-26 17:20     ` Keir Fraser
2013-08-26 17:46       ` Andrew Cooper
2013-08-26 21:47   ` Andrew Cooper
2013-08-27  7:38     ` Jan Beulich
2013-08-29 11:56   ` Tim Deegan
2013-09-04 14:39   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2013-09-04 14:50     ` Jan Beulich
2013-09-04 15:09       ` Boris Ostrovsky
2013-09-04 15:20         ` Jan Beulich
2013-09-04 16:42           ` Boris Ostrovsky
2013-09-05  7:10             ` Jan Beulich
2013-09-04 10:06 ` Ping: [PATCH 0/4] HVM: produce better binary code Jan Beulich
2013-09-04 16:16   ` Andrew Cooper
2013-09-04 16:30     ` Tim Deegan
2013-09-05  7:52       ` Jan Beulich
2013-09-05  7:58         ` Tim Deegan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130905075829.GA63530@ocelot.phlegethon.org \
    --to=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=eddie.dong@intel.com \
    --cc=jacob.shin@amd.com \
    --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.