From: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@ti.com>
To: "Cooper Jr., Franklin" <fcooper@ti.com>
Cc: "meta-arago@arago-project.org" <meta-arago@arago-project.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6 v3] board-port-labs-linux: Create new recipe using new sourceipk.bbclass feature
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 14:48:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130905184808.GK27300@edge> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8F29D6B095ED194EA1980491A5E029710C547731@DFLE08.ent.ti.com>
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 02:39:09PM -0400, Cooper Jr., Franklin wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dmytriyenko, Denys
> > Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 1:12 PM
> > To: Cooper Jr., Franklin
> > Cc: meta-arago@arago-project.org
> > Subject: Re: [meta-arago] [PATCH 3/6 v3] board-port-labs-linux: Create new
> > recipe using new sourceipk.bbclass feature
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 11:08:34AM -0500, Franklin S. Cooper Jr wrote:
> > > * Do to the inability to keep the git repository intact the board port labs
> > > recipe manually ran git clone which took a long time every time the recipe
> > was
> > > built.
> > > * Using the new SRCIPK_PRESERVED_GIT feature in sourceipk.bbclass the
> > recipes can
> > > now be treated like any other recipe and allow OE to handle the cloning and
> > > unpacking.
> > > * This will significantly shorten the amount of time required to rebuild this
> > > recipe.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Franklin S. Cooper Jr <fcooper@ti.com>
> > > ---
> > > Version 3 changes:
> > > Use a specific commit instead of using AUTOREV
> > >
> > > Version 2 changes:
> > > Split recipe into its own patch.
> > > Also use the kernel's license.
> > >
> > > .../board-port-labs/board-port-labs-linux_git.bb | 35
> > ++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644
> > > meta-arago-distro/recipes-tisdk/board-port-labs/board-port-labs-linux_
> > > git.bb
> > >
> > > diff --git
> > > a/meta-arago-distro/recipes-tisdk/board-port-labs/board-port-labs-linu
> > > x_git.bb
> > > b/meta-arago-distro/recipes-tisdk/board-port-labs/board-port-labs-linu
> > > x_git.bb
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..4ed1adf
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/meta-arago-distro/recipes-tisdk/board-port-labs/board-port-labs-
> > > +++ linux_git.bb
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
> > > +DESCRIPTION = "Git repositories containing sample board port code"
> > > +HOMEPAGE = "https://gitorious.org/sitara-board-port"
> > > +
> > > +LICENSE = "GPLv2"
> > > +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM =
> > "file://COPYING;md5=d7810fab7487fb0aad327b76f1be7cd7"
> > > +
> > > +inherit allarch
> > > +
> > > +CREATE_SRCIPK = "1"
> > > +SRCIPK_INSTALL_DIR = "board-support/board-port-labs/sitara-board-port-
> > linux"
> > > +SRCIPK_PRESERVE_GIT = "true"
> > > +
> > > +PR = "r0"
> > > +
> > > +BRANCH = "master"
> > > +SRC_URI = "git://gitorious.org/sitara-board-port/sitara-board-port-
> > linux.git;protocol=git;branch=${BRANCH}"
> > > +
> > > +SRCREV = "30df33e7134ab507a339b89a864256cabfbddea1"
> > > +
> > > +S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
> > > +
> > > +adjust_git_prepend() {
> > > +
> > > + # Checkout a specific branch instead of a commit that is used by default
> > > + git checkout ${BRANCH}
> >
> > So, you are still doing AUTOREV, even though you no longer explicitly name it
> > that way... :)
> [Franklin] Never thought of it that way. :)
> >
> > I was thinking if you agree to lock to a specific SRVREV, we don't need that
> > whole adjust_git_prepend() part with branch checkout. Comments?
> [Franklin]
> The only reason I am doing this is so someone will know exactly what branch
> they are on when looking at the git repo packaged by sourceipk.
> Without that code if they did a git status they would see "Not currently on
> any branch". By checking out the specific branch now they will see "# On
> branch master" which people tend to expect. So it's more a cosmetic change
> but does mimic how users see the board port git repositories in previous
> sdks.
Ah, I see what you are saying. I think you are right - if we don't pull or
fetch after a specific branch is checked out, then we should stay on the same
commit... Ok, I'll take it.
> >
> >
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +do_configure() {
> > > + :
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +do_compile() {
> > > + :
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > --
> > > 1.7.0.4
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > meta-arago mailing list
> > > meta-arago@arago-project.org
> > > http://arago-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meta-arago
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-05 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-05 16:08 [PATCH 3/6 v3] board-port-labs-linux: Create new recipe using new sourceipk.bbclass feature Franklin S. Cooper Jr
2013-09-05 16:08 ` [PATCH 4/6 v3] board-port-labs-u-boot: " Franklin S. Cooper Jr
2013-09-05 18:11 ` [PATCH 3/6 v3] board-port-labs-linux: " Denys Dmytriyenko
2013-09-05 18:39 ` Cooper Jr., Franklin
2013-09-05 18:48 ` Denys Dmytriyenko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130905184808.GK27300@edge \
--to=denys@ti.com \
--cc=fcooper@ti.com \
--cc=meta-arago@arago-project.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.