diff for duplicates of <201309061458.25841.marex@denx.de> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 44bd109..1741036 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -Dear J=FCrgen Beisert, +Dear J?rgen Beisert, > On Friday 06 September 2013 14:26:11 Dan Carpenter wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:08:42PM +0200, Juergen Beisert wrote: @@ -7,18 +7,17 @@ Dear J=FCrgen Beisert, > > > + u32 reg; > > > + int val; > > > + -> > > + reg =3D readl(lradc->base + LRADC_CTRL1); +> > > + reg = readl(lradc->base + LRADC_CTRL1); > > > + > > > + /* only channels 3 to 5 are of interest here */ > > > + if (reg & LRADC_CTRL1_LRADC_IRQ(TS_CH_YP)) { > > > + pr_devel("!3"); -> >=20 +> > > > Gar. I meant to comment on this the first time this patch was sent. -> >=20 +> > > > Please remove the pr_devel() calls. They are nonsense. ->=20 -> They are very helpful for development to monitor the statemachine... :) B= -ut +> +> They are very helpful for development to monitor the statemachine... :) But > you are right, I will remove them. You can put them into a separate patch which can be NAK'd separatelly :) diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 7455d86..e2152f9 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,19 +1,13 @@ "ref\01378462123-4830-1-git-send-email-jbe@pengutronix.de\0" "ref\020130906122611.GT6329@mwanda\0" "ref\0201309061430.50736.jbe@pengutronix.de\0" - "From\0Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 4/5] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: add interrupt driven touch detection\0" + "From\0marex@denx.de (Marek Vasut)\0" + "Subject\0[PATCH 4/5] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: add interrupt driven touch detection\0" "Date\0Fri, 6 Sep 2013 14:58:25 +0200\0" - "To\0J\303\274rgen Beisert <jbe@pengutronix.de>\0" - "Cc\0Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>" - linux-iio@vger.kernel.org - devel@driverdev.osuosl.org - fabio.estevam@freescale.com - linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org - " jic23@cam.ac.uk\0" + "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" - "Dear J=FCrgen Beisert,\n" + "Dear J?rgen Beisert,\n" "\n" "> On Friday 06 September 2013 14:26:11 Dan Carpenter wrote:\n" "> > On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:08:42PM +0200, Juergen Beisert wrote:\n" @@ -22,18 +16,17 @@ "> > > +\tu32 reg;\n" "> > > +\tint val;\n" "> > > +\n" - "> > > +\treg =3D readl(lradc->base + LRADC_CTRL1);\n" + "> > > +\treg = readl(lradc->base + LRADC_CTRL1);\n" "> > > +\n" "> > > +\t/* only channels 3 to 5 are of interest here */\n" "> > > +\tif (reg & LRADC_CTRL1_LRADC_IRQ(TS_CH_YP)) {\n" "> > > +\t\tpr_devel(\"!3\");\n" - "> >=20\n" + "> > \n" "> > Gar. I meant to comment on this the first time this patch was sent.\n" - "> >=20\n" + "> > \n" "> > Please remove the pr_devel() calls. They are nonsense.\n" - ">=20\n" - "> They are very helpful for development to monitor the statemachine... :) B=\n" - "ut\n" + "> \n" + "> They are very helpful for development to monitor the statemachine... :) But\n" "> you are right, I will remove them.\n" "\n" "You can put them into a separate patch which can be NAK'd separatelly :)\n" @@ -41,4 +34,4 @@ "Best regards,\n" Marek Vasut -3c84710b0b7d6903b9e35a92b468d6999788b28dd6be4910a0a7339061ea7f28 +0bf8c3e2edb62a45cd7dc9146aed78bbf66b0bfce7987dbdaf88efabb6d23502
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.