All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] arm: LLVMLinux: use current_stack_pointer for percpu
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 23:22:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130906222243.GS6617@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1378502899-1241-3-git-send-email-behanw@converseincode.com>

On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 05:28:08PM -0400, behanw at converseincode.com wrote:
> From: Behan Webster <behanw@converseincode.com>
> 
> The existing code uses named registers to get the value of the stack pointer.
> The new current_stack_pointer macro is more readable and allows for a central
> portable implementation of how to get the stack pointer with ASM.  This change
> supports being able to compile the kernel with both gcc and Clang.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Charlebois <charlebm@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Behan Webster <behanw@converseincode.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jan-Simon M?ller <dl9pf@gmx.de>
> ---
>  arch/arm/include/asm/percpu.h | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/percpu.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/percpu.h
> index 209e650..629a975 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/percpu.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/percpu.h
> @@ -30,14 +30,14 @@ static inline void set_my_cpu_offset(unsigned long off)
>  static inline unsigned long __my_cpu_offset(void)
>  {
>  	unsigned long off;
> -	register unsigned long *sp asm ("sp");
> +	unsigned long sp = current_stack_pointer;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Read TPIDRPRW.
>  	 * We want to allow caching the value, so avoid using volatile and
>  	 * instead use a fake stack read to hazard against barrier().
>  	 */
> -	asm("mrc p15, 0, %0, c13, c0, 4" : "=r" (off) : "Q" (*sp));
> +	asm("mrc p15, 0, %0, c13, c0, 4" : "=r" (off) : "Q" (sp));

This looks like it's breaking what's going on here.  With the original
code, we're passing the contents of the word at the stack pointer into
the assembly via a "Q" constraint.  After this change, we're passing
the _value_ of the stack pointer.

Also, if you read the comment, it's certainly wrong.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: behanw@converseincode.com
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mark Charlebois <charlebm@gmail.com>,
	"moderated list:ARM PORT" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] arm: LLVMLinux: use current_stack_pointer for percpu
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 23:22:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130906222243.GS6617@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1378502899-1241-3-git-send-email-behanw@converseincode.com>

On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 05:28:08PM -0400, behanw@converseincode.com wrote:
> From: Behan Webster <behanw@converseincode.com>
> 
> The existing code uses named registers to get the value of the stack pointer.
> The new current_stack_pointer macro is more readable and allows for a central
> portable implementation of how to get the stack pointer with ASM.  This change
> supports being able to compile the kernel with both gcc and Clang.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Charlebois <charlebm@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Behan Webster <behanw@converseincode.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jan-Simon Möller <dl9pf@gmx.de>
> ---
>  arch/arm/include/asm/percpu.h | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/percpu.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/percpu.h
> index 209e650..629a975 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/percpu.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/percpu.h
> @@ -30,14 +30,14 @@ static inline void set_my_cpu_offset(unsigned long off)
>  static inline unsigned long __my_cpu_offset(void)
>  {
>  	unsigned long off;
> -	register unsigned long *sp asm ("sp");
> +	unsigned long sp = current_stack_pointer;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Read TPIDRPRW.
>  	 * We want to allow caching the value, so avoid using volatile and
>  	 * instead use a fake stack read to hazard against barrier().
>  	 */
> -	asm("mrc p15, 0, %0, c13, c0, 4" : "=r" (off) : "Q" (*sp));
> +	asm("mrc p15, 0, %0, c13, c0, 4" : "=r" (off) : "Q" (sp));

This looks like it's breaking what's going on here.  With the original
code, we're passing the contents of the word at the stack pointer into
the assembly via a "Q" constraint.  After this change, we're passing
the _value_ of the stack pointer.

Also, if you read the comment, it's certainly wrong.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-06 22:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-06 21:28 [PATCH 0/5] arm: LLVMLinux: Add current_stack_pointer behanw at converseincode.com
2013-09-06 21:28 ` behanw
2013-09-06 21:28 ` [PATCH 1/5] arm: LLVMLinux: Add current_stack_pointer macro for ARM behanw at converseincode.com
2013-09-06 21:28   ` behanw
2013-09-06 22:12   ` Måns Rullgård
2013-09-06 22:12     ` Måns Rullgård
2013-09-06 22:50     ` Behan Webster
2013-09-06 22:20   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-09-06 22:20     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-09-06 22:54     ` Behan Webster
2013-09-06 21:28 ` [PATCH 2/5] arm: LLVMLinux: use current_stack_pointer for percpu behanw at converseincode.com
2013-09-06 21:28   ` behanw
2013-09-06 22:22   ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2013-09-06 22:22     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-09-06 22:56     ` Behan Webster
2013-09-06 22:31   ` Måns Rullgård
2013-09-06 22:31     ` Måns Rullgård
2013-09-06 22:59     ` Behan Webster
2013-09-07  5:12   ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-09-07  5:12     ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-09-09  9:59     ` Will Deacon
2013-09-09  9:59       ` Will Deacon
2013-09-06 21:28 ` [PATCH 3/5] arm: LLVMLinux: Use current_stack_pointer for return_address behanw at converseincode.com
2013-09-06 21:28   ` behanw
2013-09-06 21:28 ` [PATCH 4/5] arm: LLVMLinux: Use current_stack_pointer in save_stack_trace_tsk behanw at converseincode.com
2013-09-06 21:28   ` behanw
2013-09-06 21:28 ` [PATCH 5/5] arm: LLVMLinux: Use current_stack_pointer in unwind_backtrace behanw at converseincode.com
2013-09-06 21:28   ` behanw

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130906222243.GS6617@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.