From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Arun Sharma <asharma@fb.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kumar Sundararajan <kumar@fb.com>
Subject: Re: clock_gettime_ns
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 20:50:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130911185008.GB8759@netboy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrWJbtrC0FDKFQ7_qS8sdxd7LyJk562uAzrK1TJqy97YOA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 10:47:01AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> I think that coming up with something that's both non-POSIX and
> half-arsed is a bad idea, but doing something that's non-POSIX and
> well thought-through could be valuable.
I know Harlan Stenn of the Network Time Foundation is working on a new
timestamp API and presented a paper at the conference:
Requirements for UTC and Civil Timekeeping on Earth
A Colloquium Addressing a Continuous Time Standard
University of Virginia, Charlottesville, May 29-31, 2013.
http://www.cacr.caltech.edu/futureofutc/
The slides are on that site, and I would bet that the paper could be
made available. In any case, since I think any kind of new time API idea
would benefit from review and acceptance from the NTP and BSD people.
Thanks,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-11 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-04 9:18 clock_gettime_ns Arun Sharma
2013-09-04 18:51 ` clock_gettime_ns Andy Lutomirski
2013-09-04 19:20 ` clock_gettime_ns John Stultz
2013-09-04 20:33 ` clock_gettime_ns Andy Lutomirski
2013-09-04 20:54 ` clock_gettime_ns John Stultz
2013-09-04 22:29 ` clock_gettime_ns H. Peter Anvin
2013-09-04 22:59 ` clock_gettime_ns John Stultz
2013-09-04 23:04 ` clock_gettime_ns H. Peter Anvin
2013-09-04 23:20 ` clock_gettime_ns John Stultz
2013-09-04 23:38 ` clock_gettime_ns Andy Lutomirski
2013-09-05 1:22 ` clock_gettime_ns H. Peter Anvin
2013-09-09 17:47 ` clock_gettime_ns Andy Lutomirski
2013-09-11 18:50 ` Richard Cochran [this message]
2013-09-04 19:17 ` clock_gettime_ns John Stultz
2013-09-04 20:23 ` clock_gettime_ns Andy Lutomirski
2013-09-04 20:50 ` clock_gettime_ns John Stultz
2013-09-05 4:45 ` clock_gettime_ns Arun Sharma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130911185008.GB8759@netboy \
--to=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=asharma@fb.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=kumar@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.