Re: [PATCH] ARM: msm: Move msm devicetrees under a Qualcomm dir

[David Brown <davidb-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>]

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:55:36PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
>On Sep 12, 2013, at 12:06 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:

>> My original request to please use a common prefix for your product
>> families stands. Please prefix with msm-*, or if you have to, qcom-*
>> instead, since you guys can't seem to make your mind up on standard
>> prefixes (msm, apq, etc).
>
>This is silly, I dont see the reason to go with
>qcom-apq<SOC>-<BOARD>.dts and than in the future drop qcom- when we
>mostly likely shift to a dir structure.  As engineers we are all too
>aware of the lack of sanity in marketing names, but its what we have
>so we have to live with it.

At least what we'd decided a year or two ago was to call _everything_
with an msm* prefix.  If marketing comes up with cute prefixes for
things, we would basically ignore them.  So, under that, it should be
an msm8074-dragonboard.  Admittedly, it might be a little confusing
with the name of the product having the apq in it, but as others have
pointed out, I think there is less confusing than not having a common
prefix on our MSM products.

At least so far, there are no chips where apq vs msm actually
distinguishes anything.  In fact, a simple "decoder ring" would point
out that the 'apq' usually corresponds with the second digit being a
zero.  It doesn't help that we've added an 'mpq' prefix as well.

I don't really see how to satisfy all of this other than qcom-apq*, or
just continue to use msm*.

David

-- 
sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html