All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Merge and reformat boards.cfg and MAINTAINERS
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 08:29:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130919082949.1ea52c7f@lilith> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130917095500.738E.AA925319@jp.panasonic.com>

Hi Masahiro,

On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 09:55:00 +0900, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.m@jp.panasonic.com> wrote:

> Hello Albert, Tom.
> 
> 
> Commit 27af930e9 added Active/Orphan status in the first column of boards.cfg.
> 
> Could you tell the definition of "Active" and "Orphan".
> 
> 
> At first I imagined Orphan means a board without maintainer.
> But the maintainer information is missing from lots of Active boards.
> So I could not find the difference between Active and Orphan.

I have listed as "Orphan" any board mentioned in the "unknown / orphan"
sections of the original MAINTAINERS file.

If you look at the original MAINTAINERS, you'll see that some boards
were listed under a maintainer e-mail, and some boards were listed
under "unknown / orphan"; but not all boards were listed.

I set the board state in the new board.cfg to "Orphan" if and only
if the board was listed in such an "unknown / orphan" section, and to
"Active in any other case". This implies that:

- some boards were present in the old boards.cfg but not listed in
  MAINTAINERS (e.g. sh7785lcr), which means there are "Active" boards
  which do not have a maintainer;

- some "unknown / orphan" boards had a "last known maintainer address"
  specified (e.g. EVB64260_750CX), which means there are "Orphan" boards
  which have a maintainer listed.

IOW, a board's state (Active or Orphan) has no formal relationship with
this board having maintainers or not; the state only determines whether
this board should be built (Active) or not (Orphan).

Note that I have verified that ./MAKEALL -a arm built the same boards,
although I have not verified this for other architectures; and
that ./MAKEALL -m listed the same boards and maintainers (or more
exactly, listed the same boards and attributed the correct maintainers,
as some of the old ./MAKEALL -m output was incorrect), at meast for ARM
and PowerPC.

> Best Regards
> Masahiro Yamada

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-19  6:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-10 19:10 [U-Boot] [PATCH] Merge and reformat boards.cfg and MAINTAINERS Albert ARIBAUD
2013-09-11 13:52 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] " Albert ARIBAUD
2013-09-12 15:11   ` Tom Rini
2013-09-17  0:55     ` Masahiro Yamada
2013-09-19  6:29       ` Albert ARIBAUD [this message]
2013-09-27 11:05         ` Masahiro Yamada
2013-10-03 21:32           ` Albert ARIBAUD
     [not found]   ` <7B43E01F5906F9448BF8BAACD5D26B3803CA11@DENBGAT9EH2MSX.ww902.siemens.net>
2013-09-15  5:36     ` Albert ARIBAUD
2013-09-16  6:55       ` Meier, Roger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130919082949.1ea52c7f@lilith \
    --to=albert.u.boot@aribaud.net \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.