From: Vladimir Murzin <murzin.v@gmail.com>
To: Matt Evans <matt@ozlabs.org>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"dborkman@redhat.com" <dborkman@redhat.com>,
"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
"paulus@samba.org" <paulus@samba.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/2] ppc: bpf_jit: support MOD operation
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 17:35:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130922153542.GA2010@hp530> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F41DB09C-2D43-48DA-AE0A-4988B887F65C@ozlabs.org>
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 01:13:45AM +1000, Matt Evans wrote:
> Hi Vladimir,
>
> On 21 Sep 2013, at 17:25, Vladimir Murzin <murzin.v@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > commit b6069a9570 (filter: add MOD operation) added generic
> > support for modulus operation in BPF.
> >
> > This patch brings JIT support for PPC64
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Murzin <murzin.v@gmail.com>
> > Acked-by: Matt Evans <matt@ozlabs.org>
>
> Not this version, though; see below.
>
> > ---
> > arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> > index bf56e33..96f24dc 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> > @@ -193,6 +193,28 @@ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct sk_filter *fp, u32 *image,
> > PPC_MUL(r_A, r_A, r_scratch1);
> > }
> > break;
> > + case BPF_S_ALU_MOD_X: /* A %= X; */
> > + ctx->seen |= SEEN_XREG;
> > + PPC_CMPWI(r_X, 0);
> > + if (ctx->pc_ret0 != -1) {
> > + PPC_BCC(COND_EQ, addrs[ctx->pc_ret0]);
> > + } else {
> > + PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_NE, (ctx->idx*4)+12);
> > + PPC_LI(r_ret, 0);
> > + PPC_JMP(exit_addr);
> > + }
> > + PPC_DIVWU(r_scratch1, r_A, r_X);
> > + PPC_MUL(r_scratch1, r_X, r_scratch1);
> > + PPC_SUB(r_A, r_A, r_scratch1);
> > + break;
> > + case BPF_S_ALU_MOD_K: /* A %= K; */
> > +#define r_scratch2 (r_scratch1 + 1)
>
> Old version of this patch, still? I had hoped that r_scratch2 would be defined in the header.
Oops.. been keeping the old version.. sorry for that, Matt :(
>
> > + PPC_LI32(r_scratch2, K);
> > + PPC_DIVWU(r_scratch1, r_A, r_scratch2);
> > + PPC_MUL(r_scratch1, r_scratch2, r_scratch1);
> > + PPC_SUB(r_A, r_A, r_scratch1);
> > +#undef r_scratch2
>
> And remember this guy too.. :)
I've included the patch below. Nothing is missed this time, I hope ;)
>
>
> Matt
>
> > + break;
> > case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_X: /* A /= X; */
> > ctx->seen |= SEEN_XREG;
> > PPC_CMPWI(r_X, 0);
> > --
> > 1.8.1.5
---
From: Vladimir Murzin <murzin.v@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 01:29:39 +0400
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ppc: bpf_jit: support MOD operation
commit b6069a9570 (filter: add MOD operation) added generic
support for modulus operation in BPF.
This patch brings JIT support for PPC64
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Murzin <murzin.v@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Matt Evans <matt@ozlabs.org>
---
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h | 1 +
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
index 8a5dfaf..42a115a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
#define r_X 5
#define r_addr 6
#define r_scratch1 7
+#define r_scratch2 8
#define r_D 14
#define r_HL 15
#define r_M 16
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index bf56e33..cbb2702 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -193,6 +193,26 @@ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct sk_filter *fp, u32 *image,
PPC_MUL(r_A, r_A, r_scratch1);
}
break;
+ case BPF_S_ALU_MOD_X: /* A %= X; */
+ ctx->seen |= SEEN_XREG;
+ PPC_CMPWI(r_X, 0);
+ if (ctx->pc_ret0 != -1) {
+ PPC_BCC(COND_EQ, addrs[ctx->pc_ret0]);
+ } else {
+ PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_NE, (ctx->idx*4)+12);
+ PPC_LI(r_ret, 0);
+ PPC_JMP(exit_addr);
+ }
+ PPC_DIVWU(r_scratch1, r_A, r_X);
+ PPC_MUL(r_scratch1, r_X, r_scratch1);
+ PPC_SUB(r_A, r_A, r_scratch1);
+ break;
+ case BPF_S_ALU_MOD_K: /* A %= K; */
+ PPC_LI32(r_scratch2, K);
+ PPC_DIVWU(r_scratch1, r_A, r_scratch2);
+ PPC_MUL(r_scratch1, r_scratch2, r_scratch1);
+ PPC_SUB(r_A, r_A, r_scratch1);
+ break;
case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_X: /* A /= X; */
ctx->seen |= SEEN_XREG;
PPC_CMPWI(r_X, 0);
--
1.8.1.5
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vladimir Murzin <murzin.v@gmail.com>
To: Matt Evans <matt@ozlabs.org>
Cc: "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"benh@kernel.crashing.org" <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
"paulus@samba.org" <paulus@samba.org>,
"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
"dborkman@redhat.com" <dborkman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/2] ppc: bpf_jit: support MOD operation
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 17:35:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130922153542.GA2010@hp530> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F41DB09C-2D43-48DA-AE0A-4988B887F65C@ozlabs.org>
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 01:13:45AM +1000, Matt Evans wrote:
> Hi Vladimir,
>
> On 21 Sep 2013, at 17:25, Vladimir Murzin <murzin.v@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > commit b6069a9570 (filter: add MOD operation) added generic
> > support for modulus operation in BPF.
> >
> > This patch brings JIT support for PPC64
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Murzin <murzin.v@gmail.com>
> > Acked-by: Matt Evans <matt@ozlabs.org>
>
> Not this version, though; see below.
>
> > ---
> > arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> > index bf56e33..96f24dc 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> > @@ -193,6 +193,28 @@ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct sk_filter *fp, u32 *image,
> > PPC_MUL(r_A, r_A, r_scratch1);
> > }
> > break;
> > + case BPF_S_ALU_MOD_X: /* A %= X; */
> > + ctx->seen |= SEEN_XREG;
> > + PPC_CMPWI(r_X, 0);
> > + if (ctx->pc_ret0 != -1) {
> > + PPC_BCC(COND_EQ, addrs[ctx->pc_ret0]);
> > + } else {
> > + PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_NE, (ctx->idx*4)+12);
> > + PPC_LI(r_ret, 0);
> > + PPC_JMP(exit_addr);
> > + }
> > + PPC_DIVWU(r_scratch1, r_A, r_X);
> > + PPC_MUL(r_scratch1, r_X, r_scratch1);
> > + PPC_SUB(r_A, r_A, r_scratch1);
> > + break;
> > + case BPF_S_ALU_MOD_K: /* A %= K; */
> > +#define r_scratch2 (r_scratch1 + 1)
>
> Old version of this patch, still? I had hoped that r_scratch2 would be defined in the header.
Oops.. been keeping the old version.. sorry for that, Matt :(
>
> > + PPC_LI32(r_scratch2, K);
> > + PPC_DIVWU(r_scratch1, r_A, r_scratch2);
> > + PPC_MUL(r_scratch1, r_scratch2, r_scratch1);
> > + PPC_SUB(r_A, r_A, r_scratch1);
> > +#undef r_scratch2
>
> And remember this guy too.. :)
I've included the patch below. Nothing is missed this time, I hope ;)
>
>
> Matt
>
> > + break;
> > case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_X: /* A /= X; */
> > ctx->seen |= SEEN_XREG;
> > PPC_CMPWI(r_X, 0);
> > --
> > 1.8.1.5
---
From: Vladimir Murzin <murzin.v@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 01:29:39 +0400
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ppc: bpf_jit: support MOD operation
commit b6069a9570 (filter: add MOD operation) added generic
support for modulus operation in BPF.
This patch brings JIT support for PPC64
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Murzin <murzin.v@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Matt Evans <matt@ozlabs.org>
---
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h | 1 +
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
index 8a5dfaf..42a115a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
#define r_X 5
#define r_addr 6
#define r_scratch1 7
+#define r_scratch2 8
#define r_D 14
#define r_HL 15
#define r_M 16
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index bf56e33..cbb2702 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -193,6 +193,26 @@ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct sk_filter *fp, u32 *image,
PPC_MUL(r_A, r_A, r_scratch1);
}
break;
+ case BPF_S_ALU_MOD_X: /* A %= X; */
+ ctx->seen |= SEEN_XREG;
+ PPC_CMPWI(r_X, 0);
+ if (ctx->pc_ret0 != -1) {
+ PPC_BCC(COND_EQ, addrs[ctx->pc_ret0]);
+ } else {
+ PPC_BCC_SHORT(COND_NE, (ctx->idx*4)+12);
+ PPC_LI(r_ret, 0);
+ PPC_JMP(exit_addr);
+ }
+ PPC_DIVWU(r_scratch1, r_A, r_X);
+ PPC_MUL(r_scratch1, r_X, r_scratch1);
+ PPC_SUB(r_A, r_A, r_scratch1);
+ break;
+ case BPF_S_ALU_MOD_K: /* A %= K; */
+ PPC_LI32(r_scratch2, K);
+ PPC_DIVWU(r_scratch1, r_A, r_scratch2);
+ PPC_MUL(r_scratch1, r_scratch2, r_scratch1);
+ PPC_SUB(r_A, r_A, r_scratch1);
+ break;
case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_X: /* A /= X; */
ctx->seen |= SEEN_XREG;
PPC_CMPWI(r_X, 0);
--
1.8.1.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-22 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-21 7:25 [RESEND PATCH 1/2] powerpc: net: filter: fix DIVWU instruction opcode Vladimir Murzin
2013-09-21 7:25 ` Vladimir Murzin
2013-09-21 7:25 ` [RESEND PATCH 2/2] ppc: bpf_jit: support MOD operation Vladimir Murzin
2013-09-21 7:25 ` Vladimir Murzin
2013-09-22 15:13 ` Matt Evans
2013-09-22 15:13 ` Matt Evans
2013-09-22 15:35 ` Vladimir Murzin [this message]
2013-09-22 15:35 ` Vladimir Murzin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130922153542.GA2010@hp530 \
--to=murzin.v@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=matt@ozlabs.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.