All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	"Artem S. Tashkinov" <t.artem@mailcity.com>,
	lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] hwmon: (coretemp) Report power and energy consumption
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 15:45:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130923224541.GA25966@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5240C145.6080104@linux.intel.com>

On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 03:31:33PM -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> On 09/23/2013 01:34 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >Supported by SandyBridge and newer CPUs.
> >
> >Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
> >Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> >---
> >v5: Merged to 3.12-rc1
> >v4: Replaced INIT_DELAYED_WORK with INIT_DEFERRABLE_WORK
> >v3: Added Cc:
> >v2: Fix missing symbol error on i386 builds
> >     Dropped leftover pr_info from debugging
> >
> >I am inclined to drop this patch set, as I received neither test nor code
> >review feedback even though the patch set has been out there for a long time.
> >Also, I am concerned that it overlaps or even conflicts with the proposed
> >Power Cap/RAPL driver (https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/19/260).
> <We feel that the power capping framework is the right place to show
> the RAPL data. This is not just monitoring but also control.
> There are other drivers getting developed using this framework to
> expose an uniform sysfs interface.

Thought so. Have you thought about providing a hwmon bridge ?

Thanks,
Guenter

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	"Artem S. Tashkinov" <t.artem@mailcity.com>,
	lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH v5 2/2] hwmon: (coretemp) Report power and energy consumption
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 22:45:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130923224541.GA25966@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5240C145.6080104@linux.intel.com>

On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 03:31:33PM -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> On 09/23/2013 01:34 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >Supported by SandyBridge and newer CPUs.
> >
> >Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
> >Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> >---
> >v5: Merged to 3.12-rc1
> >v4: Replaced INIT_DELAYED_WORK with INIT_DEFERRABLE_WORK
> >v3: Added Cc:
> >v2: Fix missing symbol error on i386 builds
> >     Dropped leftover pr_info from debugging
> >
> >I am inclined to drop this patch set, as I received neither test nor code
> >review feedback even though the patch set has been out there for a long time.
> >Also, I am concerned that it overlaps or even conflicts with the proposed
> >Power Cap/RAPL driver (https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/19/260).
> <We feel that the power capping framework is the right place to show
> the RAPL data. This is not just monitoring but also control.
> There are other drivers getting developed using this framework to
> expose an uniform sysfs interface.

Thought so. Have you thought about providing a hwmon bridge ?

Thanks,
Guenter

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-23 22:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-23 20:34 [PATCH v5 1/2] hwmon: (coretemp) Rename temp_data to core_data Guenter Roeck
2013-09-23 20:34 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2013-09-23 20:34 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] hwmon: (coretemp) Report power and energy consumption Guenter Roeck
2013-09-23 20:34   ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2013-09-23 22:31   ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2013-09-23 22:31     ` [lm-sensors] " Srinivas Pandruvada
2013-09-23 22:45     ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2013-09-23 22:45       ` Guenter Roeck
2013-09-23 23:25       ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2013-09-23 23:25         ` [lm-sensors] " Srinivas Pandruvada

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130923224541.GA25966@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=t.artem@mailcity.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.