From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Weijie Yang <weijie.yang@samsung.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
bob.liu@oracle.com, weijie.yang.kh@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
d.j.shin@samsung.com, heesub.shin@samsung.com,
kyungmin.park@samsung.com, hau.chen@samsung.com,
bifeng.tong@samsung.com, rui.xie@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] mm/zswap bugfix: memory leaks and other problems
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:11:34 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130924011134.GI17725@bbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000001ceb835$f0899910$d19ccb30$%yang@samsung.com>
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 04:19:36PM +0800, Weijie Yang wrote:
> This patch series fix a few bugs in mm/zswap based on Linux-3.11.
>
> v2 --> v3
> - keep GFP_KERNEL flag
Why do you drop this?
It's plain BUG. I read Bob's reply but it couldn't justify to let the pain
remain. First of all, let's fix it and better idea could come later.
>
> v1 --> v2
> - free memory in zswap_frontswap_invalidate_area(in patch 1)
> - fix whitespace corruption (line wrapping)
>
> Corresponding mail thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/18/59
>
> These issues fixed/optimized are:
>
> 1. memory leaks when re-swapon
>
> 2. memory leaks when invalidate and reclaim occur concurrently
>
> 3. avoid unnecessary page scanning
>
>
> Issues discussed in that mail thread NOT fixed as it happens rarely or
> not a big problem or controversial:
>
> 1. a "theoretical race condition" when reclaim page
> When a handle alloced from zbud, zbud considers this handle is used
> validly by upper(zswap) and can be a candidate for reclaim. But zswap has
> to initialize it such as setting swapentry and adding it to rbtree.
> so there is a race condition, such as:
> thread 0: obtain handle x from zbud_alloc
> thread 1: zbud_reclaim_page is called
> thread 1: callback zswap_writeback_entry to reclaim handle x
> thread 1: get swpentry from handle x (it is random value now)
> thread 1: bad thing may happen
> thread 0: initialize handle x with swapentry
>
> 2. frontswap_map bitmap not cleared after zswap reclaim
> Frontswap uses frontswap_map bitmap to track page in "backend" implementation,
> when zswap reclaim a page, the corresponding bitmap record is not cleared.
>
> 3. the potential that zswap store and reclaim functions called recursively
>
>
> mm/zswap.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Weijie Yang <weijie.yang@samsung.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
bob.liu@oracle.com, weijie.yang.kh@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
d.j.shin@samsung.com, heesub.shin@samsung.com,
kyungmin.park@samsung.com, hau.chen@samsung.com,
bifeng.tong@samsung.com, rui.xie@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] mm/zswap bugfix: memory leaks and other problems
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:11:34 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130924011134.GI17725@bbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000001ceb835$f0899910$d19ccb30$%yang@samsung.com>
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 04:19:36PM +0800, Weijie Yang wrote:
> This patch series fix a few bugs in mm/zswap based on Linux-3.11.
>
> v2 --> v3
> - keep GFP_KERNEL flag
Why do you drop this?
It's plain BUG. I read Bob's reply but it couldn't justify to let the pain
remain. First of all, let's fix it and better idea could come later.
>
> v1 --> v2
> - free memory in zswap_frontswap_invalidate_area(in patch 1)
> - fix whitespace corruption (line wrapping)
>
> Corresponding mail thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/18/59
>
> These issues fixed/optimized are:
>
> 1. memory leaks when re-swapon
>
> 2. memory leaks when invalidate and reclaim occur concurrently
>
> 3. avoid unnecessary page scanning
>
>
> Issues discussed in that mail thread NOT fixed as it happens rarely or
> not a big problem or controversial:
>
> 1. a "theoretical race condition" when reclaim page
> When a handle alloced from zbud, zbud considers this handle is used
> validly by upper(zswap) and can be a candidate for reclaim. But zswap has
> to initialize it such as setting swapentry and adding it to rbtree.
> so there is a race condition, such as:
> thread 0: obtain handle x from zbud_alloc
> thread 1: zbud_reclaim_page is called
> thread 1: callback zswap_writeback_entry to reclaim handle x
> thread 1: get swpentry from handle x (it is random value now)
> thread 1: bad thing may happen
> thread 0: initialize handle x with swapentry
>
> 2. frontswap_map bitmap not cleared after zswap reclaim
> Frontswap uses frontswap_map bitmap to track page in "backend" implementation,
> when zswap reclaim a page, the corresponding bitmap record is not cleared.
>
> 3. the potential that zswap store and reclaim functions called recursively
>
>
> mm/zswap.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-24 1:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-23 8:19 [PATCH v3 0/3] mm/zswap bugfix: memory leaks and other problems Weijie Yang
2013-09-23 8:19 ` Weijie Yang
2013-09-24 1:11 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2013-09-24 1:11 ` Minchan Kim
2013-09-25 7:21 ` Weijie Yang
2013-09-25 7:21 ` Weijie Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130924011134.GI17725@bbox \
--to=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bifeng.tong@samsung.com \
--cc=bob.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=d.j.shin@samsung.com \
--cc=hau.chen@samsung.com \
--cc=heesub.shin@samsung.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rui.xie@samsung.com \
--cc=sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=weijie.yang.kh@gmail.com \
--cc=weijie.yang@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.