From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Takao Indoh <indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: bhe@redhat.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
alex.williamson@redhat.com, dwmw2@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] intel-iommu: Quiesce devices before disabling IOMMU
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 15:16:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130924131621.GC5150@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1379484541-4496-1-git-send-email-indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 03:09:01PM +0900, Takao Indoh wrote:
> + /*
> + * In the case of kdump, ioremap is needed because root-entry table
> + * exists in first kernel's memory area which is not mapped in second
> + * kernel
> + */
> + root = (struct root_entry *)ioremap(addr, PAGE_SIZE);
> + if (!root)
> + return;
> +
> + for (bus = 0; bus < ROOT_ENTRY_NR; bus++) {
> + if (!root_present(&root[bus]))
> + continue;
> +
> + context = (struct context_entry *)ioremap(
> + root[bus].val & VTD_PAGE_MASK, PAGE_SIZE);
> + if (!context)
> + continue;
> +
> + for (devfn = 0; devfn < CONTEXT_ENTRY_NR; devfn++) {
> + if (!context_present(&context[devfn]))
> + continue;
> +
> + dev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(segment, bus, devfn);
> + if (!dev)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (!pci_reset_bus(dev->bus)) /* go to next bus */
> + break;
> + else /* Try per-function reset */
> + pci_reset_function(dev);
> +
> + }
> + iounmap(context);
> + }
> + iounmap(root);
I am not convinced that this is the right approach. If a device wasn't
translated by VT-d in the old kernel doesn't mean it will not be
translated in the new kernel. How about unconditionally resetting all
PCI busses and/or functions here before IOMMU initialization proceeds?
Joerg
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joerg Roedel <joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Takao Indoh <indou.takao-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: bhe-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
kexec-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
dwmw2-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] intel-iommu: Quiesce devices before disabling IOMMU
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 15:16:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130924131621.GC5150@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1379484541-4496-1-git-send-email-indou.takao-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 03:09:01PM +0900, Takao Indoh wrote:
> + /*
> + * In the case of kdump, ioremap is needed because root-entry table
> + * exists in first kernel's memory area which is not mapped in second
> + * kernel
> + */
> + root = (struct root_entry *)ioremap(addr, PAGE_SIZE);
> + if (!root)
> + return;
> +
> + for (bus = 0; bus < ROOT_ENTRY_NR; bus++) {
> + if (!root_present(&root[bus]))
> + continue;
> +
> + context = (struct context_entry *)ioremap(
> + root[bus].val & VTD_PAGE_MASK, PAGE_SIZE);
> + if (!context)
> + continue;
> +
> + for (devfn = 0; devfn < CONTEXT_ENTRY_NR; devfn++) {
> + if (!context_present(&context[devfn]))
> + continue;
> +
> + dev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(segment, bus, devfn);
> + if (!dev)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (!pci_reset_bus(dev->bus)) /* go to next bus */
> + break;
> + else /* Try per-function reset */
> + pci_reset_function(dev);
> +
> + }
> + iounmap(context);
> + }
> + iounmap(root);
I am not convinced that this is the right approach. If a device wasn't
translated by VT-d in the old kernel doesn't mean it will not be
translated in the new kernel. How about unconditionally resetting all
PCI busses and/or functions here before IOMMU initialization proceeds?
Joerg
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Takao Indoh <indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
dwmw2@infradead.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
alex.williamson@redhat.com, bhe@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] intel-iommu: Quiesce devices before disabling IOMMU
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 15:16:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130924131621.GC5150@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1379484541-4496-1-git-send-email-indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 03:09:01PM +0900, Takao Indoh wrote:
> + /*
> + * In the case of kdump, ioremap is needed because root-entry table
> + * exists in first kernel's memory area which is not mapped in second
> + * kernel
> + */
> + root = (struct root_entry *)ioremap(addr, PAGE_SIZE);
> + if (!root)
> + return;
> +
> + for (bus = 0; bus < ROOT_ENTRY_NR; bus++) {
> + if (!root_present(&root[bus]))
> + continue;
> +
> + context = (struct context_entry *)ioremap(
> + root[bus].val & VTD_PAGE_MASK, PAGE_SIZE);
> + if (!context)
> + continue;
> +
> + for (devfn = 0; devfn < CONTEXT_ENTRY_NR; devfn++) {
> + if (!context_present(&context[devfn]))
> + continue;
> +
> + dev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(segment, bus, devfn);
> + if (!dev)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (!pci_reset_bus(dev->bus)) /* go to next bus */
> + break;
> + else /* Try per-function reset */
> + pci_reset_function(dev);
> +
> + }
> + iounmap(context);
> + }
> + iounmap(root);
I am not convinced that this is the right approach. If a device wasn't
translated by VT-d in the old kernel doesn't mean it will not be
translated in the new kernel. How about unconditionally resetting all
PCI busses and/or functions here before IOMMU initialization proceeds?
Joerg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-24 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-18 6:09 [PATCH v2] intel-iommu: Quiesce devices before disabling IOMMU Takao Indoh
2013-09-18 6:09 ` Takao Indoh
2013-09-18 6:09 ` Takao Indoh
2013-09-18 9:03 ` Baoquan He
2013-09-18 9:03 ` Baoquan He
2013-09-18 9:03 ` Baoquan He
2013-09-24 13:16 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2013-09-24 13:16 ` Joerg Roedel
2013-09-24 13:16 ` Joerg Roedel
2013-09-24 13:39 ` David Woodhouse
2013-09-24 13:39 ` David Woodhouse
2013-09-24 13:39 ` David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130924131621.GC5150@8bytes.org \
--to=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.