* [lm-sensors] Two Temp 1 Values
@ 2013-09-24 16:02 Alan
2013-09-27 16:20 ` Guenter Roeck
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Alan @ 2013-09-24 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
SGkgbG0tc2Vuc29ycywKCkkgaGF2ZSBhIHBlY3VsaWFyIHNpdHVhdGlvbiB3aGVyZSBsbS1zZW5z
b3JzIHByb2R1Y2VzIHR3byBkaWZmZXJlbnQKdmFsdWVzIG9mICJ0ZW1wIDEiLiBUaGUgb3V0cHV0
IGZyb20gInNlbnNvcnMiIGF0IHRoZSBjb21tYW5kIGxpbmUgc2hvd3MKdGhpczoKCiQgc2Vuc29y
cwpmYW0xNWhfcG93ZXItcGNpLTAwYzQKQWRhcHRlcjogUENJIGFkYXB0ZXIKcG93ZXIxOiAgICAg
IDEwMC4zMCBXICAoY3JpdCA9IDEyNS4xOSBXKQoKazEwdGVtcC1wY2ktMDBjMwpBZGFwdGVyOiBQ
Q0kgYWRhcHRlcgp0ZW1wMTogICAgICAgICsxMS44wrBDICAoaGlnaCA9ICs3MC4wwrBDKQogICAg
ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIChjcml0ID0gKzgwLjDCsEMsIGh5c3QgPSArNzcuMMKwQykKCml0
ODcyOC1pc2EtMDIyOApBZGFwdGVyOiBJU0EgYWRhcHRlcgppbjA6ICAgICAgICAgICswLjkwIFYg
IChtaW4gPSAgKzAuMDAgViwgbWF4ID0gICszLjA2IFYpCmluMTogICAgICAgICAgKzEuNTAgViAg
KG1pbiA9ICArMC4wMCBWLCBtYXggPSAgKzMuMDYgVikKaW4yOiAgICAgICAgICArMS45OSBWICAo
bWluID0gICswLjAwIFYsIG1heCA9ICArMy4wNiBWKQorMy4zVjogICAgICAgICszLjM2IFYgICht
aW4gPSAgKzAuMDAgViwgbWF4ID0gICs2LjEyIFYpCmluNDogICAgICAgICAgKzIuMDAgViAgKG1p
biA9ICArMC4wMCBWLCBtYXggPSAgKzMuMDYgVikKaW41OiAgICAgICAgICArMi4yMyBWICAobWlu
ID0gICswLjAwIFYsIG1heCA9ICArMy4wNiBWKQppbjY6ICAgICAgICAgICsyLjIzIFYgIChtaW4g
PSAgKzAuMDAgViwgbWF4ID0gICszLjA2IFYpCjNWU0I6ICAgICAgICAgKzMuMjkgViAgKG1pbiA9
ICArMC4wMCBWLCBtYXggPSAgKzYuMTIgVikKVmJhdDogICAgICAgICArMy4xNyBWICAKZmFuMTog
ICAgICAgIDIyMjAgUlBNICAobWluID0gICAgMCBSUE0pCmZhbjI6ICAgICAgICAxMTk2IFJQTSAg
KG1pbiA9ICAgIDAgUlBNKQpmYW4zOiAgICAgICAgICAgMCBSUE0gIChtaW4gPSAgICAwIFJQTSkK
dGVtcDE6ICAgICAgICArMzAuMMKwQyAgKGxvdyAgPSArMTI3LjDCsEMsIGhpZ2ggPSArMTI3LjDC
sEMpICBzZW5zb3IgPSB0aGVybWlzdG9yCnRlbXAyOiAgICAgICAgKzI5LjDCsEMgIChsb3cgID0g
KzEyNy4wwrBDLCBoaWdoID0gKzEyNy4wwrBDKSAgc2Vuc29yID0gdGhlcm1hbCBkaW9kZQp0ZW1w
MzogICAgICAgICsyNy4wwrBDICAobG93ICA9ICsxMjcuMMKwQywgaGlnaCA9ICsxMjcuMMKwQykg
IHNlbnNvciA9IHRoZXJtYWwgZGlvZGUKaW50cnVzaW9uMDogIEFMQVJNCgoKSGVuY2UsIGFueXRo
aW5nIG1vbml0b3JpbmcgdGVtcGVyYXR1cmVzLCBzdWNoIGFzICJDb25reSIsIGdpdmVzIHR3bwpy
ZWFkaW5ncyBmb3IgInRlbXAxIi4KClJlZ2FyZHMKCkFsYW4gUGFsbWVyCgpfX19fX19fX19fX19f
X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXwpsbS1zZW5zb3JzIG1haWxpbmcgbGlz
dApsbS1zZW5zb3JzQGxtLXNlbnNvcnMub3JnCmh0dHA6Ly9saXN0cy5sbS1zZW5zb3JzLm9yZy9t
YWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2xtLXNlbnNvcnM
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [lm-sensors] Two Temp 1 Values
2013-09-24 16:02 [lm-sensors] Two Temp 1 Values Alan
@ 2013-09-27 16:20 ` Guenter Roeck
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2013-09-27 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 05:02:43PM +0100, Alan wrote:
> Hi lm-sensors,
>
> I have a peculiar situation where lm-sensors produces two different
> values of "temp 1". The output from "sensors" at the command line shows
If the system has 10 different temperature sensor chips, you'll see ten times
"temp1".
Just to give you an example, this is the output from a line card
on a high end switch with a large number of temperature sensors:
root@fpc2:~# sensors | grep temp
temp1: +34.5 C (low = +75.0 C, high = +80.0 C) ALARM (LOW)
temp1: +38.0 C (low = +75.0 C, high = +80.0 C) ALARM (LOW)
temp1: +24.5 C (low = +75.0 C, high = +80.0 C) ALARM (LOW)
temp1: +25.5 C (low = +75.0 C, high = +80.0 C) ALARM (LOW)
temp1: +34.5 C (low = +75.0 C, high = +80.0 C) ALARM (LOW)
temp1: +34.5 C (low = +75.0 C, high = +80.0 C) ALARM (LOW)
temp1: +28.8 C (low = +0.0 C) ALARM (HIGH, CRIT)
temp1: +37.0 C (high = +90.0 C)
temp2: +41.5 C (high = +110.0 C, crit = +110.0 C)
temp3: +40.0 C (high = +127.0 C)
temp4: +45.0 C (high = +100.0 C)
temp5: +46.0 C (high = +100.0 C, crit = +127.0 C)
temp6: FAULT (high = +100.0 C, crit = +90.0 C)
temp7: FAULT (high = +100.0 C, crit = +90.0 C)
temp1: +39.0 C (high = +90.0 C)
temp2: +38.8 C (high = +110.0 C, crit = +110.0 C)
temp3: +37.0 C (high = +127.0 C)
temp4: +43.0 C (high = +100.0 C)
temp5: +40.0 C (high = +100.0 C, crit = +127.0 C)
temp6: FAULT (high = +100.0 C, crit = +90.0 C)
temp7: FAULT (high = +100.0 C, crit = +90.0 C)
temp1: +25.4 C (low = -10.0 C, high = +105.0 C)
temp1: +39.8 C (low = -10.0 C, high = +75.0 C)
temp1: +42.2 C (low = -10.0 C, high = +75.0 C)
temp1: +43.1 C (low = -10.0 C, high = +75.0 C)
temp1: +35.2 C (low = -10.0 C, high = +75.0 C)
temp1: +29.5 C (low = -10.0 C, high = +75.0 C)
temp1: +29.4 C (low = -10.0 C, high = +75.0 C)
temp1: +30.4 C (low = +0.0 C, high = +75.0 C)
temp1: +28.8 C (low = +0.0 C, high = +75.0 C)
temp1: +27.7 C (low = -30.0 C, high = +110.0 C)
temp1: +29.8 C (low = -30.0 C, high = +110.0 C)
temp1: +33.8 C (low = -30.0 C, high = +110.0 C)
temp1: +37.2 C (low = -30.0 C, high = +110.0 C)
temp1: +28.9 C (low = -30.0 C, high = +110.0 C)
temp1: +29.5 C (low = -30.0 C, high = +110.0 C)
temp1: +32.3 C (low = -30.0 C, high = +110.0 C)
temp1: +39.8 C (low = -30.0 C, high = +110.0 C)
Nothing wrong with that (except that limits are not initialized correctly
in some cases, and unused sensor inputs are not disabled). Your application
needs to be able to distinguish between sensor chips, not just between
sensor attribute names.
Guenter
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-09-27 16:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-09-24 16:02 [lm-sensors] Two Temp 1 Values Alan
2013-09-27 16:20 ` Guenter Roeck
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.