From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: +157.8% netperf throughput by "ipv4: raise IP_MAX_MTU to theoretical limit"
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 09:35:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130926013558.GA10050@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130926012144.GA9931@localhost>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8776 bytes --]
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 09:21:44AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> We are glad to find that your below commit brings large increase in
> lo netperf throughput:
>
> 35596b2796713c6a9dc0 734d2725db879f3f6fcd
> ------------------------ ------------------------
> 761.80 +534.6% 4834.60 lkp-ib03/micro/netperf/120s-200%-UDP_STREAM
> 168.10 +1317.4% 2382.70 lkp-nex04/micro/netperf/120s-200%-UDP_STREAM
> 169.60 +979.4% 1830.70 lkp-nex05/micro/netperf/120s-200%-UDP_STREAM
> 2154.20 +135.7% 5077.50 lkp-sb03/micro/netperf/120s-200%-UDP_STREAM
> 3559.00 -3.5% 3435.20 lkp-t410/micro/netperf/120s-200%-TCP_STREAM
> 6812.70 +157.8% 17560.70 TOTAL netperf.Throughput_Mbps
>
> The side effects are some increased/decreased lock contentions:
This direct view may be more clear. Before patch:
class name con-bounces contentions waittime-min waittime-max waittime-total acq-bounces acquis
itions holdtime-min holdtime-max holdtime-total
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------
&(&nf->lru_lock)->rlock: 19017744 19034681 0.15 5884.35 5772892473.69 20428335 20
475976 0.10 1109.59 77448429.38
-----------------------
&(&nf->lru_lock)->rlock 4905538 [<ffffffff819227b9>] ip_defrag+0xa4f/0xbd3
&(&nf->lru_lock)->rlock 5695105 [<ffffffff8195bd6f>] inet_frag_find+0x2c7/0x30d
&(&nf->lru_lock)->rlock 5629414 [<ffffffff8195be74>] inet_frag_kill+0xbf/0x117
&(&nf->lru_lock)->rlock 2804624 [<ffffffff8195bf29>] inet_frag_evictor+0x5d/0x103
-----------------------
&(&nf->lru_lock)->rlock 6172104 [<ffffffff8195bd6f>] inet_frag_find+0x2c7/0x30d
&(&nf->lru_lock)->rlock 5348696 [<ffffffff8195be74>] inet_frag_kill+0xbf/0x117
&(&nf->lru_lock)->rlock 4421308 [<ffffffff819227b9>] ip_defrag+0xa4f/0xbd3
&(&nf->lru_lock)->rlock 3092573 [<ffffffff8195bf29>] inet_frag_evictor+0x5d/0x103
...............................................................................................................................................................................................
&(&q->lock)->rlock: 2322575 2323896 0.22 5802.58 934469091.38 3041941 13000848 0.10 5902.91 2811690638.18
------------------
&(&q->lock)->rlock 2163449 [<ffffffff8195bf7e>] inet_frag_evictor+0xb2/0x103
&(&q->lock)->rlock 160447 [<ffffffff81921e91>] ip_defrag+0x127/0xbd3
------------------
&(&q->lock)->rlock 2165896 [<ffffffff81921e91>] ip_defrag+0x127/0xbd3
&(&q->lock)->rlock 158000 [<ffffffff8195bf7e>] inet_frag_evictor+0xb2/0x103
...............................................................................................................................................................................................
&(&zone->lock)->rlock: 1845042 1851805 0.18 4917.52 19475590.18 9003807 10134386 0.13 3747.70 8347088.06
---------------------
&(&zone->lock)->rlock 866751 [<ffffffff8116fbbc>] __free_pages_ok.part.47+0x94/0x2a1
&(&zone->lock)->rlock 984597 [<ffffffff8116f856>] get_page_from_freelist+0x4a3/0x6e8
&(&zone->lock)->rlock 112 [<ffffffff8116fe3b>] free_pcppages_bulk+0x35/0x31a
&(&zone->lock)->rlock 116 [<ffffffff8116f72c>] get_page_from_freelist+0x379/0x6e8
---------------------
&(&zone->lock)->rlock 918190 [<ffffffff8116fbbc>] __free_pages_ok.part.47+0x94/0x2a1
&(&zone->lock)->rlock 722 [<ffffffff8116f72c>] get_page_from_freelist+0x379/0x6e8
&(&zone->lock)->rlock 861 [<ffffffff8116fe3b>] free_pcppages_bulk+0x35/0x31a
&(&zone->lock)->rlock 922607 [<ffffffff8116f856>] get_page_from_freelist+0x4a3/0x6e8
After patch, top contented locks become:
&(&zone->lock)->rlock: 58469530 58470181 0.16 4838.84 238618042.87 107374530 107408478 0.13 3610.05 73617127.93
---------------------
&(&zone->lock)->rlock 29783268 [<ffffffff8116f856>] get_page_from_freelist+0x4a3/0x6e8
&(&zone->lock)->rlock 837 [<ffffffff8116f72c>] get_page_from_freelist+0x379/0x6e8
&(&zone->lock)->rlock 1105 [<ffffffff8116fe3b>] free_pcppages_bulk+0x35/0x31a
&(&zone->lock)->rlock 28684627 [<ffffffff8116fbbc>] __free_pages_ok.part.47+0x94/0x2a1
---------------------
&(&zone->lock)->rlock 11356 [<ffffffff8116fe3b>] free_pcppages_bulk+0x35/0x31a
&(&zone->lock)->rlock 6741 [<ffffffff8116f72c>] get_page_from_freelist+0x379/0x6e8
&(&zone->lock)->rlock 28880589 [<ffffffff8116f856>] get_page_from_freelist+0x4a3/0x6e8
&(&zone->lock)->rlock 29558251 [<ffffffff8116fbbc>] __free_pages_ok.part.47+0x94/0x2a1
...............................................................................................................................................................................................
slock-AF_INET: 507780 508036 0.20 1167.78 2564695.48 11115246 106594271 0.12 1196.01 989718694.82
-------------
slock-AF_INET 434691 [<ffffffff818ed738>] lock_sock_fast+0x2f/0x84
slock-AF_INET 73294 [<ffffffff819482dc>] udp_queue_rcv_skb+0x1ba/0x3aa
slock-AF_INET 51 [<ffffffff818ed6b5>] lock_sock_nested+0x34/0x88
-------------
slock-AF_INET 434615 [<ffffffff819482dc>] udp_queue_rcv_skb+0x1ba/0x3aa
slock-AF_INET 73370 [<ffffffff818ed738>] lock_sock_fast+0x2f/0x84
slock-AF_INET 51 [<ffffffff8193fae1>] tcp_v4_rcv+0x390/0x978
..............................................................................................................................................................................................
&rq->lock: 286309 286456 0.21 294.85 1768779.90 5887506 244517912 0.09 1080.71 315600465.71
---------
&rq->lock 92057 [<ffffffff81a0aa65>] __schedule+0x103/0x852
&rq->lock 18386 [<ffffffff810ecc02>] try_to_wake_up+0x95/0x26c
&rq->lock 730 [<ffffffff810f13fb>] update_blocked_averages+0x30/0x47f
&rq->lock 304 [<ffffffff81a0af43>] __schedule+0x5e1/0x852
---------
&rq->lock 107807 [<ffffffff810ecd7b>] try_to_wake_up+0x20e/0x26c
&rq->lock 144391 [<ffffffff81a0aa65>] __schedule+0x103/0x852
&rq->lock 924 [<ffffffff810ecc02>] try_to_wake_up+0x95/0x26c
&rq->lock 29 [<ffffffff810e9090>] task_rq_lock+0x4b/0x85
Thanks,
Fengguang
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
lkp@01.org, "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: +157.8% netperf throughput by "ipv4: raise IP_MAX_MTU to theoretical limit"
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 09:35:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130926013558.GA10050@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130926012144.GA9931@localhost>
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 09:21:44AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> We are glad to find that your below commit brings large increase in
> lo netperf throughput:
>
> 35596b2796713c6a9dc0 734d2725db879f3f6fcd
> ------------------------ ------------------------
> 761.80 +534.6% 4834.60 lkp-ib03/micro/netperf/120s-200%-UDP_STREAM
> 168.10 +1317.4% 2382.70 lkp-nex04/micro/netperf/120s-200%-UDP_STREAM
> 169.60 +979.4% 1830.70 lkp-nex05/micro/netperf/120s-200%-UDP_STREAM
> 2154.20 +135.7% 5077.50 lkp-sb03/micro/netperf/120s-200%-UDP_STREAM
> 3559.00 -3.5% 3435.20 lkp-t410/micro/netperf/120s-200%-TCP_STREAM
> 6812.70 +157.8% 17560.70 TOTAL netperf.Throughput_Mbps
>
> The side effects are some increased/decreased lock contentions:
This direct view may be more clear. Before patch:
class name con-bounces contentions waittime-min waittime-max waittime-total acq-bounces acquis
itions holdtime-min holdtime-max holdtime-total
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------
&(&nf->lru_lock)->rlock: 19017744 19034681 0.15 5884.35 5772892473.69 20428335 20
475976 0.10 1109.59 77448429.38
-----------------------
&(&nf->lru_lock)->rlock 4905538 [<ffffffff819227b9>] ip_defrag+0xa4f/0xbd3
&(&nf->lru_lock)->rlock 5695105 [<ffffffff8195bd6f>] inet_frag_find+0x2c7/0x30d
&(&nf->lru_lock)->rlock 5629414 [<ffffffff8195be74>] inet_frag_kill+0xbf/0x117
&(&nf->lru_lock)->rlock 2804624 [<ffffffff8195bf29>] inet_frag_evictor+0x5d/0x103
-----------------------
&(&nf->lru_lock)->rlock 6172104 [<ffffffff8195bd6f>] inet_frag_find+0x2c7/0x30d
&(&nf->lru_lock)->rlock 5348696 [<ffffffff8195be74>] inet_frag_kill+0xbf/0x117
&(&nf->lru_lock)->rlock 4421308 [<ffffffff819227b9>] ip_defrag+0xa4f/0xbd3
&(&nf->lru_lock)->rlock 3092573 [<ffffffff8195bf29>] inet_frag_evictor+0x5d/0x103
...............................................................................................................................................................................................
&(&q->lock)->rlock: 2322575 2323896 0.22 5802.58 934469091.38 3041941 13000848 0.10 5902.91 2811690638.18
------------------
&(&q->lock)->rlock 2163449 [<ffffffff8195bf7e>] inet_frag_evictor+0xb2/0x103
&(&q->lock)->rlock 160447 [<ffffffff81921e91>] ip_defrag+0x127/0xbd3
------------------
&(&q->lock)->rlock 2165896 [<ffffffff81921e91>] ip_defrag+0x127/0xbd3
&(&q->lock)->rlock 158000 [<ffffffff8195bf7e>] inet_frag_evictor+0xb2/0x103
...............................................................................................................................................................................................
&(&zone->lock)->rlock: 1845042 1851805 0.18 4917.52 19475590.18 9003807 10134386 0.13 3747.70 8347088.06
---------------------
&(&zone->lock)->rlock 866751 [<ffffffff8116fbbc>] __free_pages_ok.part.47+0x94/0x2a1
&(&zone->lock)->rlock 984597 [<ffffffff8116f856>] get_page_from_freelist+0x4a3/0x6e8
&(&zone->lock)->rlock 112 [<ffffffff8116fe3b>] free_pcppages_bulk+0x35/0x31a
&(&zone->lock)->rlock 116 [<ffffffff8116f72c>] get_page_from_freelist+0x379/0x6e8
---------------------
&(&zone->lock)->rlock 918190 [<ffffffff8116fbbc>] __free_pages_ok.part.47+0x94/0x2a1
&(&zone->lock)->rlock 722 [<ffffffff8116f72c>] get_page_from_freelist+0x379/0x6e8
&(&zone->lock)->rlock 861 [<ffffffff8116fe3b>] free_pcppages_bulk+0x35/0x31a
&(&zone->lock)->rlock 922607 [<ffffffff8116f856>] get_page_from_freelist+0x4a3/0x6e8
After patch, top contented locks become:
&(&zone->lock)->rlock: 58469530 58470181 0.16 4838.84 238618042.87 107374530 107408478 0.13 3610.05 73617127.93
---------------------
&(&zone->lock)->rlock 29783268 [<ffffffff8116f856>] get_page_from_freelist+0x4a3/0x6e8
&(&zone->lock)->rlock 837 [<ffffffff8116f72c>] get_page_from_freelist+0x379/0x6e8
&(&zone->lock)->rlock 1105 [<ffffffff8116fe3b>] free_pcppages_bulk+0x35/0x31a
&(&zone->lock)->rlock 28684627 [<ffffffff8116fbbc>] __free_pages_ok.part.47+0x94/0x2a1
---------------------
&(&zone->lock)->rlock 11356 [<ffffffff8116fe3b>] free_pcppages_bulk+0x35/0x31a
&(&zone->lock)->rlock 6741 [<ffffffff8116f72c>] get_page_from_freelist+0x379/0x6e8
&(&zone->lock)->rlock 28880589 [<ffffffff8116f856>] get_page_from_freelist+0x4a3/0x6e8
&(&zone->lock)->rlock 29558251 [<ffffffff8116fbbc>] __free_pages_ok.part.47+0x94/0x2a1
...............................................................................................................................................................................................
slock-AF_INET: 507780 508036 0.20 1167.78 2564695.48 11115246 106594271 0.12 1196.01 989718694.82
-------------
slock-AF_INET 434691 [<ffffffff818ed738>] lock_sock_fast+0x2f/0x84
slock-AF_INET 73294 [<ffffffff819482dc>] udp_queue_rcv_skb+0x1ba/0x3aa
slock-AF_INET 51 [<ffffffff818ed6b5>] lock_sock_nested+0x34/0x88
-------------
slock-AF_INET 434615 [<ffffffff819482dc>] udp_queue_rcv_skb+0x1ba/0x3aa
slock-AF_INET 73370 [<ffffffff818ed738>] lock_sock_fast+0x2f/0x84
slock-AF_INET 51 [<ffffffff8193fae1>] tcp_v4_rcv+0x390/0x978
..............................................................................................................................................................................................
&rq->lock: 286309 286456 0.21 294.85 1768779.90 5887506 244517912 0.09 1080.71 315600465.71
---------
&rq->lock 92057 [<ffffffff81a0aa65>] __schedule+0x103/0x852
&rq->lock 18386 [<ffffffff810ecc02>] try_to_wake_up+0x95/0x26c
&rq->lock 730 [<ffffffff810f13fb>] update_blocked_averages+0x30/0x47f
&rq->lock 304 [<ffffffff81a0af43>] __schedule+0x5e1/0x852
---------
&rq->lock 107807 [<ffffffff810ecd7b>] try_to_wake_up+0x20e/0x26c
&rq->lock 144391 [<ffffffff81a0aa65>] __schedule+0x103/0x852
&rq->lock 924 [<ffffffff810ecc02>] try_to_wake_up+0x95/0x26c
&rq->lock 29 [<ffffffff810e9090>] task_rq_lock+0x4b/0x85
Thanks,
Fengguang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-26 1:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-26 1:21 +157.8% netperf throughput by "ipv4: raise IP_MAX_MTU to theoretical limit" Fengguang Wu
2013-09-26 1:21 ` Fengguang Wu
2013-09-26 1:35 ` Fengguang Wu [this message]
2013-09-26 1:35 ` Fengguang Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130926013558.GA10050@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.