From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [Query] Stack Overflow in "arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c" while unwinding frame
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 19:11:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131002181116.GH29794@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFrcx1m=3_74SiVecGF14DF827UzAwprNZMVVGRa46aqqVGATw@mail.gmail.com>
On 24 September 2013 07:23, Anurag Aggarwal <anurag19aggarwal@gmail.com> wrote:
> While executing unwind backtrace instructions in ARM, in the function
> unwind_exec_insn()
> there are chances that SP overflows from stack.
>
>
> For example while executing instruction with opcode 0xAE, vsp can go
> beyond stack to area that has not been allocated till now.
>
> unsigned long *vsp = (unsigned long *)ctrl->vrs[SP];
> int reg;
>
> /* pop R4-R[4+bbb] */
> for (reg = 4; reg <= 4 + (insn & 7); reg++)
> ctrl->vrs[reg] = *vsp++;
>
> The above scenario can happen while executing any of the unwind instruction.
>
> One of the ways to fix the problem is to check for vsp with stack
> limits before we increment it, but doing it for all the instructions
> seems a little bad.
>
> I just want to know that if anyone has faced the problem before
I haven't seen it but I think with some stack (or unwind bytecode)
corruption it could happen.
I think we could place some checks only when vsp is assigned and return
-URC_FAILURE, together with some warning.
--
Catalin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Anurag Aggarwal <anurag19aggarwal@gmail.com>
Cc: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@linaro.org>,
"linux@arm.linux.org.uk" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Query] Stack Overflow in "arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c" while unwinding frame
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 19:11:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131002181116.GH29794@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFrcx1m=3_74SiVecGF14DF827UzAwprNZMVVGRa46aqqVGATw@mail.gmail.com>
On 24 September 2013 07:23, Anurag Aggarwal <anurag19aggarwal@gmail.com> wrote:
> While executing unwind backtrace instructions in ARM, in the function
> unwind_exec_insn()
> there are chances that SP overflows from stack.
>
>
> For example while executing instruction with opcode 0xAE, vsp can go
> beyond stack to area that has not been allocated till now.
>
> unsigned long *vsp = (unsigned long *)ctrl->vrs[SP];
> int reg;
>
> /* pop R4-R[4+bbb] */
> for (reg = 4; reg <= 4 + (insn & 7); reg++)
> ctrl->vrs[reg] = *vsp++;
>
> The above scenario can happen while executing any of the unwind instruction.
>
> One of the ways to fix the problem is to check for vsp with stack
> limits before we increment it, but doing it for all the instructions
> seems a little bad.
>
> I just want to know that if anyone has faced the problem before
I haven't seen it but I think with some stack (or unwind bytecode)
corruption it could happen.
I think we could place some checks only when vsp is assigned and return
-URC_FAILURE, together with some warning.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-02 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-24 5:23 [Query] Stack Overflow in "arch/arm/kernel/unwind.c" while unwinding frame Anurag Aggarwal
2013-09-24 6:28 ` Jean Pihet
2013-09-24 6:28 ` Jean Pihet
2013-09-24 6:29 ` Anurag Aggarwal
2013-09-24 6:29 ` Anurag Aggarwal
2013-10-02 18:11 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2013-10-02 18:11 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-10-06 7:14 ` Anurag Aggarwal
2013-10-06 7:14 ` Anurag Aggarwal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131002181116.GH29794@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.