All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: update win8 OSI blacklist
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 01:53:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131007005355.GA22211@srcf.ucam.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMP44s1knbxW5C_tRSqopRLd+b2fXfuH=E3_L4EdOAUG4RMVhg@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 07:50:18PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> wrote:
> > I don't get the final
> > say in whether or not this patch gets merged, but there's a decent
> > chance that I'm going to be the one who has to remove the entries again
> > once the backlight mess is fixed up. My life would be significantly
> > easier if the entries are unambiguously identified in such a way that I
> > can remove them without having to dig through git history to figure out
> > where each came from.
> 
> And a *single* comment on top of this group entries achieves that just
> fine. You haven't provided a single argument as to why that wouldn't
> be the case.

No, it demonstrably doesn't. The comments that do exist refer to only a 
subset of the entries underneath them. Having a per-entry comment is 
significantly clearer. Given that I have to delete things from this file 
and you don't, I have absolutely no idea why you refuse to believe me on 
this.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-07  0:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-03 17:13 [PATCH] acpi: update win8 OSI blacklist Felipe Contreras
2013-10-03 17:22 ` Felipe Contreras
     [not found]   ` <CAANYUdCUg4GM5YX8KkokgqBGaUJjrtcHrkWaQEyhxUcivYnqMQ@mail.gmail.com>
2013-10-19  2:30     ` Felipe Contreras
2013-10-04 16:12 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-10-06 20:29   ` Felipe Contreras
2013-10-06 20:33     ` Matthew Garrett
2013-10-06 20:40       ` Felipe Contreras
2013-10-06 20:45         ` Matthew Garrett
2013-10-06 20:51           ` Felipe Contreras
2013-10-06 20:59             ` Matthew Garrett
2013-10-06 23:27               ` Felipe Contreras
2013-10-06 23:31                 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-10-06 23:36                   ` Felipe Contreras
2013-10-06 23:57                     ` Matthew Garrett
2013-10-07  0:27                       ` Felipe Contreras
2013-10-07  0:32                         ` Matthew Garrett
2013-10-07  0:50                           ` Felipe Contreras
2013-10-07  0:53                             ` Matthew Garrett [this message]
2013-10-07  1:01                               ` Felipe Contreras
2013-10-07  1:27                                 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-10-07  1:54                                   ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-10-07  2:21                                     ` Felipe Contreras
2013-10-07  2:13                                   ` Felipe Contreras
2013-10-14  3:30 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-10-14 11:58   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-10-14 13:14     ` Felipe Contreras
2013-10-14 14:16       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-10-14 23:04         ` Felipe Contreras

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131007005355.GA22211@srcf.ucam.org \
    --to=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.