Re: [meta-qt5] Update to 5.1.1?

[Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>]

On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 09:29:50PM +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:15:36PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 03:49:22PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 08:43:48PM +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 08:57:10PM +0200, Eric Bénard wrote:
> > > > > > > Le Mon, 07 Oct 2013 14:37:39 -0400,
> > > > > > > Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org> a écrit :
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 08:29:56PM +0200, Eric Bénard wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Hi Denys,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Le Mon, 07 Oct 2013 14:01:20 -0400,
> > > > > > > > > Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org> a écrit :
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Martin, Otavio, et al,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Are you planning on updating Qt version in master to 5.1.1
> > any
> > > > > > time soon,
> > > > > > > > > > preferably before 1.5 release? :) If nobody looked into
> > that yet,
> > > > > > will you be
> > > > > > > > > > open to take patches for the same?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I have 5.1.1 in test here. I expect to send the patch in the
> > coming
> > > > > > > > > days.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks! Sounds good. Let me know if you need help in testing!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > as soon as it finish to compile here I'll send the patch serie
> > for
> > > > > > > testing.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +Laszlo
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Laszlo also said that he is working on patches for 5.1.1 I don't
> > know
> > > > > > how far he got..
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Not any far, sorry, but I would be happy to use someone else's
> > patches. By
> > > > > the way, it would be nice to have 5.2.0 alpha (and later beta)
> > updates
> > > > > soon, too.
> > > >
> > > > Having 5.2.0 alpha would be nice, but that's probably too unstable to
> > try and
> > > > get in before Dora release. I want 5.1.1 as the latest stable to get
> > into
> > > > Dora. :) So, I'm offering any help to expedite things like testing and
> > such :)
> > >
> > > I've already branched meta-qt5/dora before removing 5.0.2 recipes from
> > > master.
> > >
> > > I'm willing to "backport" 5.1.1 from master to dora or even remove 5.0.2
> > > there as well, but last time I've asked around nobody responded to say
> > > if they are still using 5.0.2 or 5.1.* is good enough for everybody.
> >
> > Sorry for not responding before, but for our needs 5.0.2 is not sufficient,
> > 5.1.x and specifically 5.1.1 is preferred. I would very appreciate
> > backporting
> > 5.1.1 into Dora
> 
> Be careful with this. I assume you mean the dora branch as opposed to the
> Dora poky release.

Not to sound rude and I mean no offense to our Poky friends, but I don't care 
about Poky release here. I care about the Yocto Project unified tagging and 
branching strategy, so yes, Dora branch is what I meant. And besides, Poky 
release does not contain meta-qt5, as far as I know.

-- 
Denys