From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] Soft dirty tracking fixes
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 00:02:24 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131008200224.GB19040@moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131008125013.85dcccf418260d43b6cb120a@linux-foundation.org>
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 12:50:13PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> Do you consider the problems which patches 1 and 2 address to be
> sufficiently serious to justify backporting into -stable?
Good question! Yeah, since dirty bit traking is in 3.11 already,
it would be great to merge these two patches into -stable.
Should I resend them with stable team CC'ed?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] Soft dirty tracking fixes
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 00:02:24 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131008200224.GB19040@moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131008125013.85dcccf418260d43b6cb120a@linux-foundation.org>
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 12:50:13PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> Do you consider the problems which patches 1 and 2 address to be
> sufficiently serious to justify backporting into -stable?
Good question! Yeah, since dirty bit traking is in 3.11 already,
it would be great to merge these two patches into -stable.
Should I resend them with stable team CC'ed?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-08 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-08 9:00 [patch 0/3] Soft dirty tracking fixes Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-10-08 9:00 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-10-08 9:00 ` [patch 1/3] [PATCH] mm: migration -- Do not loose soft dirty bit if page is in migration state Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-10-08 9:00 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-10-08 14:11 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2013-10-08 14:11 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2013-10-08 14:40 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-10-08 14:40 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-10-08 14:47 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2013-10-08 14:47 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2013-10-08 9:00 ` [patch 2/3] [PATCH] mm: pagemap -- Inspect _PAGE_SOFT_DIRTY only on present pages Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-10-08 9:00 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-10-08 14:26 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2013-10-08 14:26 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2013-10-08 9:00 ` [patch 3/3] [PATCH -mm] mm: Unify pte_to_pgoff and pgoff_to_pte helpers Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-10-08 9:00 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-10-08 19:50 ` [patch 0/3] Soft dirty tracking fixes Andrew Morton
2013-10-08 19:50 ` Andrew Morton
2013-10-08 20:02 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2013-10-08 20:02 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-10-08 20:06 ` Andrew Morton
2013-10-08 20:06 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131008200224.GB19040@moon \
--to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.