From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: omap: Add support for optional wake-up interrupt
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 09:37:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131018163740.GP15154@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131018161916.GF18921@gimli>
* Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> [131018 09:19]:
> > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
> > @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
> > #include <linux/irq.h>
> > #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> > #include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> > #include <linux/gpio.h>
> > #include <linux/of_gpio.h>
> > #include <linux/platform_data/serial-omap.h>
> > @@ -134,7 +135,7 @@ struct uart_omap_port {
> > struct uart_port port;
> > struct uart_omap_dma uart_dma;
> > struct device *dev;
> > -
> > + int irqs[2];
> > unsigned char ier;
> > unsigned char lcr;
> > unsigned char mcr;
> > @@ -176,6 +177,8 @@ struct uart_omap_port {
> > };
> >
> > #define to_uart_omap_port(p) ((container_of((p), struct uart_omap_port, port)))
> > +#define omap_uartirq (up->irqs[0])
> > +#define omap_wakeirq (up->irqs[1])
> >
> > static struct uart_omap_port *ui[OMAP_MAX_HSUART_PORTS];
> >
> > @@ -214,10 +217,23 @@ static int serial_omap_get_context_loss_count(struct uart_omap_port *up)
> > return pdata->get_context_loss_count(up->dev);
> > }
> >
> > +static inline void serial_omap_enable_wakeirq(struct uart_omap_port *up,
> > + bool enable)
> > +{
> > + if (!omap_wakeirq)
> > + return;
>
> can we drop the pointless obfuscation ?
Hmm care to specify what exactly you have in mind here? The wakeirq
is optional so we need to check for it.
Do you mean get rid of serial_omap_enable_wakeirq() or get rid of
the defines for omap_uartirq and omap_wakeirq?
> > @@ -689,15 +705,25 @@ static int serial_omap_startup(struct uart_port *port)
> > {
> > struct uart_omap_port *up = to_uart_omap_port(port);
> > unsigned long flags = 0;
> > - int retval;
> > + int i, retval;
> >
> > /*
> > - * Allocate the IRQ
> > + * Allocate the IRQs, the second IRQ is the optional wakeirq
> > */
> > - retval = request_irq(up->port.irq, serial_omap_irq, up->port.irqflags,
> > - up->name, up);
> > - if (retval)
> > - return retval;
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(up->irqs); i++) {
> > + if (i == 1 && !omap_wakeirq) {
> > + dev_info(up->port.dev, "no wakeirq for uart%d\n",
> > + up->port.line);
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + retval = devm_request_irq(up->port.dev, up->irqs[i],
> > + serial_omap_irq, up->port.irqflags,
> > + up->name, up);
>
> conversion to devm_* should be done as another patch, it seems.
OK, I'll separate the devm_* changes from this patch. It's seems
that we're currently mostly devm_*, so let's do that first.
> > @@ -786,7 +813,10 @@ static void serial_omap_shutdown(struct uart_port *port)
> >
> > pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(up->dev);
> > pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(up->dev);
> > - free_irq(up->port.irq, up);
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(up->irqs); i++)
> > + if (up->irqs[i])
> > + devm_free_irq(up->port.dev, up->irqs[i], up);
>
> do you need this at all if you're using devm_* ?
So it seems, startup and shutdown are managed by serial_core and
that's what at least clps711x.c serial driver is doing.
Regards,
Tony
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] serial: omap: Add support for optional wake-up interrupt
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 09:37:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131018163740.GP15154@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131018161916.GF18921@gimli>
* Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> [131018 09:19]:
> > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
> > @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
> > #include <linux/irq.h>
> > #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> > #include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> > #include <linux/gpio.h>
> > #include <linux/of_gpio.h>
> > #include <linux/platform_data/serial-omap.h>
> > @@ -134,7 +135,7 @@ struct uart_omap_port {
> > struct uart_port port;
> > struct uart_omap_dma uart_dma;
> > struct device *dev;
> > -
> > + int irqs[2];
> > unsigned char ier;
> > unsigned char lcr;
> > unsigned char mcr;
> > @@ -176,6 +177,8 @@ struct uart_omap_port {
> > };
> >
> > #define to_uart_omap_port(p) ((container_of((p), struct uart_omap_port, port)))
> > +#define omap_uartirq (up->irqs[0])
> > +#define omap_wakeirq (up->irqs[1])
> >
> > static struct uart_omap_port *ui[OMAP_MAX_HSUART_PORTS];
> >
> > @@ -214,10 +217,23 @@ static int serial_omap_get_context_loss_count(struct uart_omap_port *up)
> > return pdata->get_context_loss_count(up->dev);
> > }
> >
> > +static inline void serial_omap_enable_wakeirq(struct uart_omap_port *up,
> > + bool enable)
> > +{
> > + if (!omap_wakeirq)
> > + return;
>
> can we drop the pointless obfuscation ?
Hmm care to specify what exactly you have in mind here? The wakeirq
is optional so we need to check for it.
Do you mean get rid of serial_omap_enable_wakeirq() or get rid of
the defines for omap_uartirq and omap_wakeirq?
> > @@ -689,15 +705,25 @@ static int serial_omap_startup(struct uart_port *port)
> > {
> > struct uart_omap_port *up = to_uart_omap_port(port);
> > unsigned long flags = 0;
> > - int retval;
> > + int i, retval;
> >
> > /*
> > - * Allocate the IRQ
> > + * Allocate the IRQs, the second IRQ is the optional wakeirq
> > */
> > - retval = request_irq(up->port.irq, serial_omap_irq, up->port.irqflags,
> > - up->name, up);
> > - if (retval)
> > - return retval;
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(up->irqs); i++) {
> > + if (i == 1 && !omap_wakeirq) {
> > + dev_info(up->port.dev, "no wakeirq for uart%d\n",
> > + up->port.line);
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + retval = devm_request_irq(up->port.dev, up->irqs[i],
> > + serial_omap_irq, up->port.irqflags,
> > + up->name, up);
>
> conversion to devm_* should be done as another patch, it seems.
OK, I'll separate the devm_* changes from this patch. It's seems
that we're currently mostly devm_*, so let's do that first.
> > @@ -786,7 +813,10 @@ static void serial_omap_shutdown(struct uart_port *port)
> >
> > pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(up->dev);
> > pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(up->dev);
> > - free_irq(up->port.irq, up);
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(up->irqs); i++)
> > + if (up->irqs[i])
> > + devm_free_irq(up->port.dev, up->irqs[i], up);
>
> do you need this at all if you're using devm_* ?
So it seems, startup and shutdown are managed by serial_core and
that's what at least clps711x.c serial driver is doing.
Regards,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-18 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-17 23:28 [PATCH] serial: omap: Add support for optional wake-up interrupt Tony Lindgren
2013-10-17 23:28 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-10-18 16:19 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-10-18 16:19 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-10-18 16:37 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2013-10-18 16:37 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-10-18 16:45 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-10-18 16:45 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-10-18 22:56 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-10-18 22:56 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-10-21 9:07 ` Roger Quadros
2013-10-21 9:07 ` Roger Quadros
2013-10-21 12:21 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-10-21 12:21 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-10-22 13:49 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-10-22 13:49 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131018163740.GP15154@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rogerq@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.