From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>, <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
<xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] xfstests: stat the dev we're removing to make sure its' really gone V2
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 11:10:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131021151021.GI6924@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52654329.8050808@redhat.com>
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 10:07:21AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 10/18/13 1:26 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > I've been periodically failing btrfs/003 because my box sometimes takes a little
> > longer to unregister the device when we remove it and so the output from btrfs
> > dev show doesn't match what we are wanting since it still sees the device. To
> > fix this just stat and sleep if we still see the device node and only continue
> > once udev or whatever actually removes the device node so that we don't get
> > random failures. Thanks,
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
> > ---
> > V1->V2: Take Eric's suggestion to do this in the helper function
> >
> > common/rc | 9 +++++++++
> > tests/btrfs/003 | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
> > index b253948..253bd05 100644
> > --- a/common/rc
> > +++ b/common/rc
> > @@ -2093,7 +2093,16 @@ _require_freeze()
> > # ls -l /sys/class/block/sdd | rev | cut -d "/" -f 3 | rev
> > _devmgt_remove()
> > {
> > + local h=$1
>
> $h is never used? You use ${1} directly below. Is that intentional?
> (Not sure if you just meant to eat $1 or if you forgot to replace it
> in the echo string).
>
> (if you respin, maybe give "$h" a more meaningful name?)
>
Yeah I screwed up, I'll respin. Thanks,
Josef
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] xfstests: stat the dev we're removing to make sure its' really gone V2
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 11:10:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131021151021.GI6924@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52654329.8050808@redhat.com>
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 10:07:21AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 10/18/13 1:26 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > I've been periodically failing btrfs/003 because my box sometimes takes a little
> > longer to unregister the device when we remove it and so the output from btrfs
> > dev show doesn't match what we are wanting since it still sees the device. To
> > fix this just stat and sleep if we still see the device node and only continue
> > once udev or whatever actually removes the device node so that we don't get
> > random failures. Thanks,
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
> > ---
> > V1->V2: Take Eric's suggestion to do this in the helper function
> >
> > common/rc | 9 +++++++++
> > tests/btrfs/003 | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
> > index b253948..253bd05 100644
> > --- a/common/rc
> > +++ b/common/rc
> > @@ -2093,7 +2093,16 @@ _require_freeze()
> > # ls -l /sys/class/block/sdd | rev | cut -d "/" -f 3 | rev
> > _devmgt_remove()
> > {
> > + local h=$1
>
> $h is never used? You use ${1} directly below. Is that intentional?
> (Not sure if you just meant to eat $1 or if you forgot to replace it
> in the echo string).
>
> (if you respin, maybe give "$h" a more meaningful name?)
>
Yeah I screwed up, I'll respin. Thanks,
Josef
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-21 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-18 18:26 [PATCH 1/8] xfstests: fix btrfs/002 to not use the scratch dev pool Josef Bacik
2013-10-18 18:26 ` Josef Bacik
2013-10-18 18:26 ` [PATCH 2/8] xfstests: add regression test for kernel bz 60673 Josef Bacik
2013-10-18 18:26 ` Josef Bacik
2013-10-21 15:03 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-21 15:03 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-21 15:09 ` Josef Bacik
2013-10-21 15:09 ` Josef Bacik
2013-10-21 15:14 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-21 15:14 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-21 15:21 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-21 15:21 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-18 18:26 ` [PATCH 3/8] xfstests: stat the dev we're removing to make sure its' really gone V2 Josef Bacik
2013-10-18 18:26 ` Josef Bacik
2013-10-21 15:07 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-21 15:07 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-21 15:10 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2013-10-21 15:10 ` Josef Bacik
2013-10-18 18:26 ` [PATCH 4/8] xfstests: btrfs/016: a hole punching send test Josef Bacik
2013-10-18 18:26 ` Josef Bacik
2013-10-21 15:22 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-21 15:22 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-22 21:02 ` Rich Johnston
2013-10-22 21:02 ` Rich Johnston
2013-10-18 18:26 ` [PATCH 5/8] xfstests: generic/274 increase scratch fs size to 2g Josef Bacik
2013-10-18 18:26 ` Josef Bacik
2013-10-21 15:29 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-21 15:29 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-22 20:25 ` Rich Johnston
2013-10-22 20:25 ` Rich Johnston
2013-10-18 18:26 ` [PATCH 6/8] xfstests: generic/311: add a few more test cases Josef Bacik
2013-10-18 18:26 ` Josef Bacik
2013-10-21 15:37 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-21 15:37 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-18 18:26 ` [PATCH 7/8] xfstests: btrfs/017: add a regression test for snapshot creation Josef Bacik
2013-10-18 18:26 ` Josef Bacik
2013-10-22 21:06 ` Rich Johnston
2013-10-22 21:06 ` Rich Johnston
2013-10-18 18:26 ` [PATCH 8/8] xfstests: btrfs/018: a regression test for subvolume rename Josef Bacik
2013-10-18 18:26 ` Josef Bacik
2013-10-21 15:38 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-21 15:38 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-22 21:09 ` Rich Johnston
2013-10-22 21:09 ` Rich Johnston
2013-10-22 20:57 ` [PATCH 1/8] xfstests: fix btrfs/002 to not use the scratch dev pool Rich Johnston
2013-10-22 20:57 ` Rich Johnston
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131021151021.GI6924@localhost.localdomain \
--to=jbacik@fusionio.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.