From: jhovold@gmail.com (Johan Hovold)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] misc: atmel_pwm: set initcall level to subsys
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 15:07:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131031140747.GH29813@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131031053037.GA30542@ns203013.ovh.net>
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 06:30:37AM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 09:19 Thu 31 Oct , Bo Shen wrote:
> > Hi Arnd,
> >
> > On 10/31/2013 04:46, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > >On Wednesday 30 October 2013, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > >>>I really hate this type of patch, as it's papering over the real
> > >>>problem. What happens when someone else moves their driver to this
> > >>>level? Then you are back to the original problem.
> > >>
> > >>Yes, it's crude, but it's currently the only way to express a preferred
> > >>probe order.
> > >
> > >Does the same problem occur with the generic PWM subsystem?
> > >
> > >The atmel_pwm driver apparently is the last PWM driver that has
> > >not been converted to the generic subsystem yet. Doing that would
> > >also let us drop the atmel-pwm-bl driver in favor of the generic
> > >backlight.
> >
> > The atmel pwm driver is on the way to generic subsystem. more
> > information at:
> > --->8---
> > PWM: atmel-pwm: add PWM controller driver:
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2963081/
>
> so the fix can be drop in favor of the conversion
This patch (2/2) has been dropped, but the dependency issue still has to
be addressed (by adding deferred-probing support). The atmel-pwm-bl
driver has not been removed yet and the fix is also needed in stable.
Johan
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Johan Hovold <jhovold@gmail.com>
To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Cc: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Johan Hovold <jhovold@gmail.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] misc: atmel_pwm: set initcall level to subsys
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 15:07:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131031140747.GH29813@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131031053037.GA30542@ns203013.ovh.net>
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 06:30:37AM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 09:19 Thu 31 Oct , Bo Shen wrote:
> > Hi Arnd,
> >
> > On 10/31/2013 04:46, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > >On Wednesday 30 October 2013, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > >>>I really hate this type of patch, as it's papering over the real
> > >>>problem. What happens when someone else moves their driver to this
> > >>>level? Then you are back to the original problem.
> > >>
> > >>Yes, it's crude, but it's currently the only way to express a preferred
> > >>probe order.
> > >
> > >Does the same problem occur with the generic PWM subsystem?
> > >
> > >The atmel_pwm driver apparently is the last PWM driver that has
> > >not been converted to the generic subsystem yet. Doing that would
> > >also let us drop the atmel-pwm-bl driver in favor of the generic
> > >backlight.
> >
> > The atmel pwm driver is on the way to generic subsystem. more
> > information at:
> > --->8---
> > PWM: atmel-pwm: add PWM controller driver:
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2963081/
>
> so the fix can be drop in favor of the conversion
This patch (2/2) has been dropped, but the dependency issue still has to
be addressed (by adding deferred-probing support). The atmel-pwm-bl
driver has not been removed yet and the fix is also needed in stable.
Johan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-31 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-22 16:32 [PATCH 0/2] misc: atmel_pwm: fix probe dependencies Johan Hovold
2013-10-22 16:32 ` Johan Hovold
2013-10-22 16:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] misc: atmel_pwm: add deferred-probing support Johan Hovold
2013-10-22 16:32 ` Johan Hovold
2013-10-30 11:25 ` Johan Hovold
2013-10-30 11:25 ` Johan Hovold
2013-10-30 13:24 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-10-30 13:24 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-10-22 16:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] misc: atmel_pwm: set initcall level to subsys Johan Hovold
2013-10-22 16:32 ` Johan Hovold
2013-10-29 23:22 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-10-29 23:22 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-10-30 11:07 ` Johan Hovold
2013-10-30 11:07 ` Johan Hovold
2013-10-30 20:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-10-30 20:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-10-31 1:19 ` Bo Shen
2013-10-31 1:19 ` Bo Shen
2013-10-31 5:30 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-10-31 5:30 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-10-31 14:07 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2013-10-31 14:07 ` Johan Hovold
2013-10-31 14:01 ` Johan Hovold
2013-10-31 14:01 ` Johan Hovold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131031140747.GH29813@localhost \
--to=jhovold@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.