Re: [PATCH 08/11] ARM: u300: use the common machine reset handling

All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Domenico Andreoli <cavokz@gmail.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Domenico Andreoli <domenico.andreoli@linux.com>,
	"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] ARM: u300: use the common machine reset handling
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:19:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131031151950.GA16491@glitch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdbzmqGpQKf5Mz7tKfRAuTNWV+WYSuerNFQOAsgdUOaoTg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 07:40:25AM -0700, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Domenico Andreoli
> <domenico.andreoli@linux.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: Domenico Andreoli <domenico.andreoli@linux.com>
> >
> > Proof of concept: u300 as provider of reset hooks.
> 
> Do you have a u300 to test this on or are you just guessing?

I don't have any u300, I picked it randomly. It's just to show some usage
and possibly discuss it. There are quite a lot of these hooks all around.

> Anyway, concept looks correct, so Acked-by given that the
> overall idea is accepted.

uhm.. don't see any general acceptance right now. maybe later..

thanks,
Domenico

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)

From: cavokz@gmail.com (Domenico Andreoli)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 08/11] ARM: u300: use the common machine reset handling
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:19:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131031151950.GA16491@glitch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdbzmqGpQKf5Mz7tKfRAuTNWV+WYSuerNFQOAsgdUOaoTg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 07:40:25AM -0700, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Domenico Andreoli
> <domenico.andreoli@linux.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: Domenico Andreoli <domenico.andreoli@linux.com>
> >
> > Proof of concept: u300 as provider of reset hooks.
> 
> Do you have a u300 to test this on or are you just guessing?

I don't have any u300, I picked it randomly. It's just to show some usage
and possibly discuss it. There are quite a lot of these hooks all around.

> Anyway, concept looks correct, so Acked-by given that the
> overall idea is accepted.

uhm.. don't see any general acceptance right now. maybe later..

thanks,
Domenico

next prev parent reply	other threads:[~2013-10-31 15:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-31  6:27 [PATCH 00/11] RFC: Common machine reset handling Domenico Andreoli
2013-10-31  6:27 ` Domenico Andreoli
2013-10-31  6:27 ` [PATCH 01/11] machine-reset: platform generic handling Domenico Andreoli
2013-10-31  6:27   ` Domenico Andreoli
2013-10-31  6:27 ` [PATCH 02/11] ARM: use the common machine reset handling Domenico Andreoli
2013-10-31  6:27   ` Domenico Andreoli
2013-10-31  6:27 ` [PATCH 03/11] ARM64: " Domenico Andreoli
2013-10-31  6:27   ` Domenico Andreoli
2013-10-31  6:27 ` [PATCH 04/11] MIPS: " Domenico Andreoli
2013-10-31  6:27   ` Domenico Andreoli
2013-11-01  5:11   ` Vineet Gupta
2013-11-01  5:11     ` Vineet Gupta
2013-11-01  5:26     ` Domenico Andreoli
2013-11-01  5:26       ` Domenico Andreoli
2013-10-31  6:27 ` [PATCH 05/11] ARM: vexpress: consolidate machine reset func Domenico Andreoli
2013-10-31  6:27   ` Domenico Andreoli
2013-10-31  6:27 ` [PATCH 06/11] ARM: vexpress: use the common machine reset handling Domenico Andreoli
2013-10-31  6:27   ` Domenico Andreoli
2013-10-31  6:27 ` [PATCH 07/11] ARM: bcm2835: " Domenico Andreoli
2013-10-31  6:27   ` Domenico Andreoli
2013-10-31  6:27 ` [PATCH 08/11] ARM: u300: " Domenico Andreoli
2013-10-31  6:27   ` Domenico Andreoli
2013-10-31 14:40   ` Linus Walleij
2013-10-31 14:40     ` Linus Walleij
2013-10-31 15:19     ` Domenico Andreoli [this message]
2013-10-31 15:19       ` Domenico Andreoli
2013-10-31  6:27 ` [PATCH 09/11] ARM: tps65910: " Domenico Andreoli
2013-10-31  6:27   ` Domenico Andreoli
2013-10-31  6:27 ` [PATCH 10/11] max8907: " Domenico Andreoli
2013-10-31  6:27   ` Domenico Andreoli
2013-10-31  6:27 ` [PATCH 11/11] ARM: sp805: " Domenico Andreoli
2013-10-31  6:27   ` Domenico Andreoli
2013-10-31 10:21 ` [PATCH 00/11] RFC: Common " Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-10-31 10:21   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-10-31 21:49 ` Stephen Warren
2013-10-31 21:49   ` Stephen Warren
2013-11-01  5:16   ` Domenico Andreoli
2013-11-01  5:16     ` Domenico Andreoli
2013-11-01 15:58     ` Stephen Warren
2013-11-01 15:58       ` Stephen Warren
2013-11-01 16:12       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-11-01 16:12         ` Russell King - ARM Linux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131031151950.GA16491@glitch \
    --to=cavokz@gmail.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=domenico.andreoli@linux.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.