From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: mvebu - Support a bridge with no IO port window
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:48:10 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131031164810.GA26426@obsidianresearch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131031101357.5a56e2d0@skate>
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:13:57AM +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Sorry for the delay in testing this, I was busy with kernel summit /
> ELCE. Unfortunately, this patch still causes problems here: it breaks
> usage of I/O region. I have a modified version of the e1000e driver
> that makes it access an I/O region, that I have used for testing that
> I/O handling is at least minimally working. Without your patch, it
> works fine:
No problem, thank you for testing it, I don't have any hardware like
this..
> After debugging, it turns out that the following change is the problem:
>
> - if (port->bridge.iolimit < port->bridge.iobase ||
> + if (port->bridge.iolimit <= port->bridge.iobase ||
Indeed.. I was having problems here because linux was writing 0,0
during discovery to the base,limit registers to 'disable' the IO
window, which triggered a window allocation. So I re-read the PCI
bridge spec (apparently too quickly) and decided 0,0 was OK, and it
should be <=.
However, looking again at the spec - it is very clear, < is the
correct test, and when the values is equal a 4k window should be
created.
So, I wonder if there is a little bug in the Linux discovery code
path, should it write FFFF,0 instead?
In any event, I can respin this patch so it works, I have to drop the
WARN_ON in that routine to accommodate the 0,0 write however.
> window is never created and the pci_ioremap_io() function is never
> called. Reverting this change makes your patch works fine for me.
Great, the next version should be good to go then.
Thanks,
Jason
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com (Jason Gunthorpe)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] PCI: mvebu - Support a bridge with no IO port window
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:48:10 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131031164810.GA26426@obsidianresearch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131031101357.5a56e2d0@skate>
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:13:57AM +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Sorry for the delay in testing this, I was busy with kernel summit /
> ELCE. Unfortunately, this patch still causes problems here: it breaks
> usage of I/O region. I have a modified version of the e1000e driver
> that makes it access an I/O region, that I have used for testing that
> I/O handling is at least minimally working. Without your patch, it
> works fine:
No problem, thank you for testing it, I don't have any hardware like
this..
> After debugging, it turns out that the following change is the problem:
>
> - if (port->bridge.iolimit < port->bridge.iobase ||
> + if (port->bridge.iolimit <= port->bridge.iobase ||
Indeed.. I was having problems here because linux was writing 0,0
during discovery to the base,limit registers to 'disable' the IO
window, which triggered a window allocation. So I re-read the PCI
bridge spec (apparently too quickly) and decided 0,0 was OK, and it
should be <=.
However, looking again@the spec - it is very clear, < is the
correct test, and when the values is equal a 4k window should be
created.
So, I wonder if there is a little bug in the Linux discovery code
path, should it write FFFF,0 instead?
In any event, I can respin this patch so it works, I have to drop the
WARN_ON in that routine to accommodate the 0,0 write however.
> window is never created and the pci_ioremap_io() function is never
> called. Reverting this change makes your patch works fine for me.
Great, the next version should be good to go then.
Thanks,
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-31 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-15 20:16 [PATCH v2] PCI: mvebu - Support a bridge with no IO port window Jason Gunthorpe
2013-10-15 20:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-10-17 13:10 ` Jason Cooper
2013-10-17 13:10 ` Jason Cooper
2013-10-17 14:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-10-17 14:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-10-17 14:47 ` Jason Cooper
2013-10-17 14:47 ` Jason Cooper
2013-10-31 9:13 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-10-31 9:13 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-10-31 16:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2013-10-31 16:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-10-31 17:10 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-10-31 17:10 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-10-31 23:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-10-31 23:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-11-01 2:44 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-11-01 2:44 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-11-01 5:28 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-11-01 5:28 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-11-01 13:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-11-01 13:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-11-01 16:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-11-01 16:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131031164810.GA26426@obsidianresearch.com \
--to=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
--cc=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.