From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@google.com>
Cc: Junichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
"Alasdair G. Kergon" <agk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3] dm mpath: add a queue_if_no_path timeout
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 11:53:26 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131105165326.GB25528@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1383667332.4504.8.camel@bobble.lax.corp.google.com>
On Tue, Nov 05 2013 at 11:02am -0500,
Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@google.com> wrote:
> This is the patch submitted by Jun'ichi Nomura, originally based on
> Mike's patch with some small changes by me. Jun'ichi's description
> follows, along with my changes:
>
> On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 07:18 -0800, Frank Mayhar wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 04:17 +0000, Junichi Nomura wrote:
> > > I slightly modified the patch:
> > > - fixed the timeout handler to correctly find
> > > clone request and "struct multipath"
> > > - the timeout handler just disables "queue_if_no_path"
> > > instead of killing the request directly
> > > - "dmsetup status" to show the parameter
> > > - changed an interface between dm core and target
> > > - added some debugging printk (you can remove them)
> > > and checked the timeout occurs, at least.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure if this feature is good or not though.
> > > (The timer behavior is not intuitive, I think)
> > Thanks! I integrated your new patch and tested it. Sure enough, it
> > seems to work. I've made a few tweaks (added a module tunable and
> > support for setting the timer in multipath_message(), removed your debug
> > printks) and will submit the modified patch for discussion shortly.
>
> Comments?
My primary concern is that this patch is always establishing a timed_out
method via blk_queue_rq_timed_out() regardless of whether the mpath
device needs it. I'm also not a fan of adding such a specialized
rq-based only hook (dm_rq_timed_out_fn timed_out).
Could be we'll need to do other things to the queue (be it bio-based or
rq-based) in the future.
So I prefer the approach I took to arming the queue (via new .init_queue
hook) in this patch: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3070391/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-05 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-26 17:14 RFC for multipath queue_if_no_path timeout Frank Mayhar
2013-09-26 17:24 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2013-09-26 17:31 ` Frank Mayhar
2013-09-26 17:38 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2013-09-26 17:47 ` Frank Mayhar
2013-09-26 17:52 ` Mike Snitzer
2013-09-26 20:36 ` [PATCH 1/1] dm mpath: Add timeout mechanism for queue_if_no_path Frank Mayhar
2013-09-26 23:22 ` RFC for multipath queue_if_no_path timeout Alasdair G Kergon
2013-09-26 23:49 ` Mike Snitzer
2013-09-27 6:07 ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-09-27 8:06 ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-09-27 8:37 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2013-09-27 13:52 ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-09-27 16:37 ` Frank Mayhar
2013-09-27 16:32 ` Frank Mayhar
2013-09-27 16:29 ` Frank Mayhar
2013-10-17 19:03 ` Frank Mayhar
2013-10-17 19:15 ` Mike Snitzer
2013-10-17 20:45 ` Frank Mayhar
2013-10-17 21:13 ` Mike Snitzer
2013-10-18 20:51 ` Frank Mayhar
2013-10-18 21:47 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2013-10-18 22:53 ` [RFC PATCH v2] dm mpath: add a " Mike Snitzer
2013-10-30 1:02 ` Mike Snitzer
2013-10-30 15:08 ` Frank Mayhar
2013-10-30 15:43 ` Mike Snitzer
2013-10-30 18:09 ` Frank Mayhar
2013-10-31 9:36 ` Junichi Nomura
2013-10-31 14:16 ` Frank Mayhar
2013-10-31 14:31 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2013-10-31 17:17 ` Frank Mayhar
2013-11-01 1:23 ` Junichi Nomura
2013-11-01 1:58 ` Junichi Nomura
2013-11-01 4:17 ` Junichi Nomura
2013-11-05 15:18 ` Frank Mayhar
2013-11-05 16:02 ` [RFC PATCH v3] " Frank Mayhar
2013-11-05 16:53 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2013-11-06 6:54 ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-11-06 15:43 ` Frank Mayhar
2013-11-06 19:21 ` Mike Snitzer
2013-11-07 1:03 ` Junichi Nomura
2013-10-31 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2] " Hannes Reinecke
2013-10-21 16:05 ` RFC for multipath " Benjamin Marzinski
2013-10-21 16:17 ` Frank Mayhar
2013-10-23 13:39 ` Benjamin Marzinski
2013-09-27 16:27 ` Frank Mayhar
2013-09-26 17:41 ` Mike Snitzer
2013-09-26 17:55 ` Frank Mayhar
2013-09-26 18:41 ` Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131105165326.GB25528@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=fmayhar@google.com \
--cc=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.