* [ath9k-devel] [patch] ath9k: fix SC_OP_INVALID test in ath9k_tx99_init()
@ 2013-11-05 20:20 ` Dan Carpenter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2013-11-05 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ath9k-devel
SC_OP_INVALID is zero so the test is always false. We're supposed to be
testing the lowest bit instead.
Fixes: 89f927af7f33 ('ath9k: add TX99 support')
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
index 74f452c..7ad4e11 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
@@ -2456,7 +2456,7 @@ int ath9k_tx99_init(struct ath_softc *sc)
struct ath_tx_control txctl;
int r;
- if (sc->sc_flags & SC_OP_INVALID) {
+ if (test_bit(SC_OP_INVALID, &sc->sc_flags)) {
ath_err(common,
"driver is in invalid state unable to use TX99");
return -EINVAL;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [patch] ath9k: fix SC_OP_INVALID test in ath9k_tx99_init()
@ 2013-11-05 20:20 ` Dan Carpenter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2013-11-05 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Luis R. Rodriguez
Cc: Jouni Malinen, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan, Senthil Balasubramanian,
John W. Linville, linux-wireless, ath9k-devel, kernel-janitors
SC_OP_INVALID is zero so the test is always false. We're supposed to be
testing the lowest bit instead.
Fixes: 89f927af7f33 ('ath9k: add TX99 support')
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
index 74f452c..7ad4e11 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
@@ -2456,7 +2456,7 @@ int ath9k_tx99_init(struct ath_softc *sc)
struct ath_tx_control txctl;
int r;
- if (sc->sc_flags & SC_OP_INVALID) {
+ if (test_bit(SC_OP_INVALID, &sc->sc_flags)) {
ath_err(common,
"driver is in invalid state unable to use TX99");
return -EINVAL;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [patch] ath9k: fix SC_OP_INVALID test in ath9k_tx99_init()
@ 2013-11-05 20:20 ` Dan Carpenter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2013-11-05 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Luis R. Rodriguez
Cc: Jouni Malinen, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan, Senthil Balasubramanian,
John W. Linville, linux-wireless, ath9k-devel, kernel-janitors
SC_OP_INVALID is zero so the test is always false. We're supposed to be
testing the lowest bit instead.
Fixes: 89f927af7f33 ('ath9k: add TX99 support')
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
index 74f452c..7ad4e11 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
@@ -2456,7 +2456,7 @@ int ath9k_tx99_init(struct ath_softc *sc)
struct ath_tx_control txctl;
int r;
- if (sc->sc_flags & SC_OP_INVALID) {
+ if (test_bit(SC_OP_INVALID, &sc->sc_flags)) {
ath_err(common,
"driver is in invalid state unable to use TX99");
return -EINVAL;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [ath9k-devel] [patch] ath9k: fix SC_OP_INVALID test in ath9k_tx99_init()
2013-11-05 20:20 ` Dan Carpenter
(?)
@ 2013-11-06 5:19 ` Sujith Manoharan
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Sujith Manoharan @ 2013-11-06 5:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ath9k-devel
Dan Carpenter wrote:
> SC_OP_INVALID is zero so the test is always false. We're supposed to be
> testing the lowest bit instead.
>
> Fixes: 89f927af7f33 ('ath9k: add TX99 support')
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
> index 74f452c..7ad4e11 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
> @@ -2456,7 +2456,7 @@ int ath9k_tx99_init(struct ath_softc *sc)
> struct ath_tx_control txctl;
> int r;
>
> - if (sc->sc_flags & SC_OP_INVALID) {
> + if (test_bit(SC_OP_INVALID, &sc->sc_flags)) {
> ath_err(common,
> "driver is in invalid state unable to use TX99");
> return -EINVAL;
Nice catch.
The tx99 code in ath9k has been moved to a separate file, is it okay if I adopt
this patch and update it ?
Sujith
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [patch] ath9k: fix SC_OP_INVALID test in ath9k_tx99_init()
@ 2013-11-06 5:19 ` Sujith Manoharan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Sujith Manoharan @ 2013-11-06 5:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Carpenter
Cc: John W. Linville, linux-wireless, ath9k-devel, kernel-janitors
Dan Carpenter wrote:
> SC_OP_INVALID is zero so the test is always false. We're supposed to be
> testing the lowest bit instead.
>
> Fixes: 89f927af7f33 ('ath9k: add TX99 support')
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
> index 74f452c..7ad4e11 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
> @@ -2456,7 +2456,7 @@ int ath9k_tx99_init(struct ath_softc *sc)
> struct ath_tx_control txctl;
> int r;
>
> - if (sc->sc_flags & SC_OP_INVALID) {
> + if (test_bit(SC_OP_INVALID, &sc->sc_flags)) {
> ath_err(common,
> "driver is in invalid state unable to use TX99");
> return -EINVAL;
Nice catch.
The tx99 code in ath9k has been moved to a separate file, is it okay if I adopt
this patch and update it ?
Sujith
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [patch] ath9k: fix SC_OP_INVALID test in ath9k_tx99_init()
@ 2013-11-06 5:19 ` Sujith Manoharan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Sujith Manoharan @ 2013-11-06 5:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Carpenter
Cc: John W. Linville, linux-wireless, ath9k-devel, kernel-janitors
Dan Carpenter wrote:
> SC_OP_INVALID is zero so the test is always false. We're supposed to be
> testing the lowest bit instead.
>
> Fixes: 89f927af7f33 ('ath9k: add TX99 support')
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
> index 74f452c..7ad4e11 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
> @@ -2456,7 +2456,7 @@ int ath9k_tx99_init(struct ath_softc *sc)
> struct ath_tx_control txctl;
> int r;
>
> - if (sc->sc_flags & SC_OP_INVALID) {
> + if (test_bit(SC_OP_INVALID, &sc->sc_flags)) {
> ath_err(common,
> "driver is in invalid state unable to use TX99");
> return -EINVAL;
Nice catch.
The tx99 code in ath9k has been moved to a separate file, is it okay if I adopt
this patch and update it ?
Sujith
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [ath9k-devel] [patch] ath9k: fix SC_OP_INVALID test in ath9k_tx99_init()
2013-11-06 5:19 ` Sujith Manoharan
(?)
@ 2013-11-06 6:50 ` Dan Carpenter
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2013-11-06 6:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ath9k-devel
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 10:49:21AM +0530, Sujith Manoharan wrote:
> Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > SC_OP_INVALID is zero so the test is always false. We're supposed to be
> > testing the lowest bit instead.
> >
> > Fixes: 89f927af7f33 ('ath9k: add TX99 support')
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
> > index 74f452c..7ad4e11 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
> > @@ -2456,7 +2456,7 @@ int ath9k_tx99_init(struct ath_softc *sc)
> > struct ath_tx_control txctl;
> > int r;
> >
> > - if (sc->sc_flags & SC_OP_INVALID) {
> > + if (test_bit(SC_OP_INVALID, &sc->sc_flags)) {
> > ath_err(common,
> > "driver is in invalid state unable to use TX99");
> > return -EINVAL;
>
> Nice catch.
>
> The tx99 code in ath9k has been moved to a separate file, is it okay if I adopt
> this patch and update it ?
>
Yeah. That's fine.
regards,
dan carpenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [patch] ath9k: fix SC_OP_INVALID test in ath9k_tx99_init()
@ 2013-11-06 6:50 ` Dan Carpenter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2013-11-06 6:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sujith Manoharan
Cc: John W. Linville, linux-wireless, ath9k-devel, kernel-janitors
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 10:49:21AM +0530, Sujith Manoharan wrote:
> Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > SC_OP_INVALID is zero so the test is always false. We're supposed to be
> > testing the lowest bit instead.
> >
> > Fixes: 89f927af7f33 ('ath9k: add TX99 support')
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
> > index 74f452c..7ad4e11 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
> > @@ -2456,7 +2456,7 @@ int ath9k_tx99_init(struct ath_softc *sc)
> > struct ath_tx_control txctl;
> > int r;
> >
> > - if (sc->sc_flags & SC_OP_INVALID) {
> > + if (test_bit(SC_OP_INVALID, &sc->sc_flags)) {
> > ath_err(common,
> > "driver is in invalid state unable to use TX99");
> > return -EINVAL;
>
> Nice catch.
>
> The tx99 code in ath9k has been moved to a separate file, is it okay if I adopt
> this patch and update it ?
>
Yeah. That's fine.
regards,
dan carpenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [patch] ath9k: fix SC_OP_INVALID test in ath9k_tx99_init()
@ 2013-11-06 6:50 ` Dan Carpenter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2013-11-06 6:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sujith Manoharan
Cc: John W. Linville, linux-wireless, ath9k-devel, kernel-janitors
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 10:49:21AM +0530, Sujith Manoharan wrote:
> Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > SC_OP_INVALID is zero so the test is always false. We're supposed to be
> > testing the lowest bit instead.
> >
> > Fixes: 89f927af7f33 ('ath9k: add TX99 support')
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
> > index 74f452c..7ad4e11 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
> > @@ -2456,7 +2456,7 @@ int ath9k_tx99_init(struct ath_softc *sc)
> > struct ath_tx_control txctl;
> > int r;
> >
> > - if (sc->sc_flags & SC_OP_INVALID) {
> > + if (test_bit(SC_OP_INVALID, &sc->sc_flags)) {
> > ath_err(common,
> > "driver is in invalid state unable to use TX99");
> > return -EINVAL;
>
> Nice catch.
>
> The tx99 code in ath9k has been moved to a separate file, is it okay if I adopt
> this patch and update it ?
>
Yeah. That's fine.
regards,
dan carpenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-11-06 6:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-11-05 20:20 [ath9k-devel] [patch] ath9k: fix SC_OP_INVALID test in ath9k_tx99_init() Dan Carpenter
2013-11-05 20:20 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-11-05 20:20 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-11-06 5:19 ` [ath9k-devel] " Sujith Manoharan
2013-11-06 5:31 ` Sujith Manoharan
2013-11-06 5:19 ` Sujith Manoharan
2013-11-06 6:50 ` [ath9k-devel] " Dan Carpenter
2013-11-06 6:50 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-11-06 6:50 ` Dan Carpenter
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.