From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uprobes: Cleanup !CONFIG_UPROBES decls, unexport xol_area
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 09:41:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131111084149.GC12405@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131109190344.GA32281@redhat.com>
* Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> @@ -86,6 +86,25 @@ struct return_instance {
> };
>
> /*
> + * On a breakpoint hit, thread contests for a slot. It frees the
> + * slot after singlestep. Currently a fixed number of slots are
> + * allocated.
> + */
> +struct xol_area {
So, my main complaint about the uprobes code isn't functional but
documentational, similar to what I outlined a few days ago: what this
comment does not explain is exactly what a 'XOL area' is.
You guys are changing code that reads like gobbledygook to people reading
it for the first time. It's understandable that you want to use
abbreviations and I don't object against that, but please explain key
concepts and data structures when they first come up - a very good place
to do that is in places where key structures are declared.
I didn't find any high level description of the XOL code, one which makes
clear that how we manage these out of line execution areas:
comet:~/tip> git grep -i 'out of line' $(find . -name '*uprobe*.[ch]')
arch/powerpc/kernel/uprobes.c: * arch_uprobe_pre_xol - prepare to execute out of line.
arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c: * arch_uprobe_pre_xol - prepare to execute out of line.
arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c: * address pushed by a call instruction executed out of line.
kernel/events/uprobes.c: * This area will be used for storing instructions for execution out of line.
kernel/events/uprobes.c:/* Prepare to single-step probed instruction out of line. */
The one that comes closest is:
* This area will be used for storing instructions for execution out of line.
... but that is a single sentence and deep inside the XOL code already.
Really, please make a better job of introducing other kernel hackers to
the code you are writing ...
Maybe even split the XOL code out into kernel/events/uprobes_xol.c or so?
That will give a natural place to explain yourselves at the beginning of
the file.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-11 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-09 19:03 [PATCH] uprobes: Cleanup !CONFIG_UPROBES decls, unexport xol_area Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-11 7:15 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-11-11 8:41 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2013-11-11 19:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-11 21:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-11-19 16:25 ` [PATCH] uprobes: Document xol_area and arch_uprobe->insn/ixol Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-19 19:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-11-20 11:03 ` Srikar Dronamraju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131111084149.GC12405@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.