From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Sameer Nanda <snanda@chromium.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@suse.cz, rientjes@google.com,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, semenzato@google.com,
murzin.v@gmail.com, dserrg@gmail.com, msb@chromium.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] mm, oom: Fix race when selecting process to kill
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 18:29:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131113172918.GA20145@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1384363093-8025-1-git-send-email-snanda@chromium.org>
On 11/13, Sameer Nanda wrote:
>
> The selection of the process to be killed happens in two spots:
> first in select_bad_process and then a further refinement by
> looking for child processes in oom_kill_process. Since this is
> a two step process, it is possible that the process selected by
> select_bad_process may get a SIGKILL just before oom_kill_process
> executes. If this were to happen, __unhash_process deletes this
> process from the thread_group list. This results in oom_kill_process
> getting stuck in an infinite loop when traversing the thread_group
> list of the selected process.
>
> Fix this race by adding a pid_alive check for the selected process
> with tasklist_lock held in oom_kill_process.
I am fine with this patch as well, but honestly I'd prefer the previous
v5. I won't argue though.
> +/*
> + * Careful: while_each_thread is not RCU safe. Callers should hold
> + * read_lock(tasklist_lock) across while_each_thread loops.
> + */
(tasklist_lock or siglock, in fact but this doesn't matter).
This is not that simple, even tasklist_lock can't help if the task is
already dead.
Oh. Yes, sorry. I promised to send the patches "soon" many times, but
still didn't find the time.
Perhaps I should try to start with the "make this all less buggy" changes,
the "complete" fix needs to change the callers as well.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Sameer Nanda <snanda@chromium.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@suse.cz, rientjes@google.com,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, semenzato@google.com,
murzin.v@gmail.com, dserrg@gmail.com, msb@chromium.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] mm, oom: Fix race when selecting process to kill
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 18:29:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131113172918.GA20145@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1384363093-8025-1-git-send-email-snanda@chromium.org>
On 11/13, Sameer Nanda wrote:
>
> The selection of the process to be killed happens in two spots:
> first in select_bad_process and then a further refinement by
> looking for child processes in oom_kill_process. Since this is
> a two step process, it is possible that the process selected by
> select_bad_process may get a SIGKILL just before oom_kill_process
> executes. If this were to happen, __unhash_process deletes this
> process from the thread_group list. This results in oom_kill_process
> getting stuck in an infinite loop when traversing the thread_group
> list of the selected process.
>
> Fix this race by adding a pid_alive check for the selected process
> with tasklist_lock held in oom_kill_process.
I am fine with this patch as well, but honestly I'd prefer the previous
v5. I won't argue though.
> +/*
> + * Careful: while_each_thread is not RCU safe. Callers should hold
> + * read_lock(tasklist_lock) across while_each_thread loops.
> + */
(tasklist_lock or siglock, in fact but this doesn't matter).
This is not that simple, even tasklist_lock can't help if the task is
already dead.
Oh. Yes, sorry. I promised to send the patches "soon" many times, but
still didn't find the time.
Perhaps I should try to start with the "make this all less buggy" changes,
the "complete" fix needs to change the callers as well.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-13 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-05 23:26 [PATCH] mm, oom: Fix race when selecting process to kill Sameer Nanda
2013-11-05 23:26 ` Sameer Nanda
2013-11-06 1:18 ` David Rientjes
2013-11-06 1:18 ` David Rientjes
2013-11-06 1:25 ` Luigi Semenzato
2013-11-06 1:25 ` Luigi Semenzato
2013-11-06 1:27 ` David Rientjes
2013-11-06 1:27 ` David Rientjes
2013-11-06 3:00 ` Vladimir Murzin
2013-11-06 3:00 ` Vladimir Murzin
2013-11-06 3:04 ` Sameer Nanda
2013-11-06 4:45 ` Luigi Semenzato
2013-11-06 4:45 ` Luigi Semenzato
2013-11-06 7:17 ` Luigi Semenzato
2013-11-06 7:17 ` Luigi Semenzato
2013-11-06 16:58 ` Sameer Nanda
2013-11-06 16:58 ` Sameer Nanda
2013-11-07 0:35 ` David Rientjes
2013-11-07 0:35 ` David Rientjes
2013-11-07 19:34 ` Sameer Nanda
2013-11-07 19:34 ` Sameer Nanda
2013-11-08 18:07 ` [PATCH v2] " Sameer Nanda
2013-11-08 18:07 ` Sameer Nanda
2013-11-08 18:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-08 18:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-08 19:49 ` [PATCH v3] " Sameer Nanda
2013-11-08 19:49 ` Sameer Nanda
2013-11-09 15:16 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-09 15:16 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-11 23:15 ` Sameer Nanda
2013-11-12 0:21 ` [PATCH v4] " Sameer Nanda
2013-11-12 0:21 ` Sameer Nanda
2013-11-12 15:13 ` Michal Hocko
2013-11-12 15:13 ` Michal Hocko
2013-11-12 20:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-12 20:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-12 20:08 ` Sameer Nanda
2013-11-12 20:08 ` Sameer Nanda
2013-11-12 20:23 ` [PATCH v5] " Sameer Nanda
2013-11-12 20:23 ` Sameer Nanda
2013-11-13 2:33 ` David Rientjes
2013-11-13 2:33 ` David Rientjes
2013-11-13 16:46 ` Sameer Nanda
2013-11-13 16:46 ` Sameer Nanda
2013-11-13 17:18 ` [PATCH v6] " Sameer Nanda
2013-11-13 17:18 ` Sameer Nanda
2013-11-13 17:29 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-11-13 17:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-14 13:43 ` dserrg
2013-11-14 17:03 ` Sameer Nanda
2013-11-14 17:03 ` Sameer Nanda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131113172918.GA20145@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dserrg@gmail.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=msb@chromium.org \
--cc=murzin.v@gmail.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=semenzato@google.com \
--cc=snanda@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.