From: christoffer.dall@linaro.org (Christoffer Dall)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm: KVM: Don't return PSCI_INVAL if waitqueue is inactive
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 11:21:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131120192102.GF9314@cbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA-b5CTMQLsYikHcExVDjy8BL3gnx=Z7f4jVGPCkJsD6Ew@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 07:12:42PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 20 November 2013 18:51, Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> wrote:
> > Therefore, set the pause flag on the vcpu at VCPU init time (which can
> > reasonably be expected to be completed for all CPUs by user space before
> > running any VCPUs) and clear both this flag and the feature (in case the
> > feature can somehow get set again in the future) and ping the waitqueue
> > on turning on a VCPU using PSCI.
>
> Tangential, but your phrasing prompted me to ask: how does
> the "start in PSCI power-off" boot protocol work for system reset?
> Since the kernel doesn't currently provide a "reset this v CPU"
> ioctl userspace has to do reset manually[*]; how do we say "take
> this vCPU which has started up and run once, and put it back
> into PSCI power-off" ?
>
> [*] this is pretty tedious, since it involves reading every CPU
> register on the vCPU before first run in order to feed the kernel
> back a bunch of info it already knows about the reset state of
> a vCPU.
>
So, from looking at the code and the API specification calling
KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT does exactly this and also resets all core and cp15
registers for you - you would here be able to set the power-off flag and
pause those CPUs so PSCI can wake them up again.
Am I missing something here?
This makes me wonder if it's worth adding to
Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt that KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT should be
called on all VCPUs before running any of the VCPUs...
-Christoffer
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
arm-mail-list <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: KVM: Don't return PSCI_INVAL if waitqueue is inactive
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 11:21:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131120192102.GF9314@cbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA-b5CTMQLsYikHcExVDjy8BL3gnx=Z7f4jVGPCkJsD6Ew@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 07:12:42PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 20 November 2013 18:51, Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> wrote:
> > Therefore, set the pause flag on the vcpu at VCPU init time (which can
> > reasonably be expected to be completed for all CPUs by user space before
> > running any VCPUs) and clear both this flag and the feature (in case the
> > feature can somehow get set again in the future) and ping the waitqueue
> > on turning on a VCPU using PSCI.
>
> Tangential, but your phrasing prompted me to ask: how does
> the "start in PSCI power-off" boot protocol work for system reset?
> Since the kernel doesn't currently provide a "reset this v CPU"
> ioctl userspace has to do reset manually[*]; how do we say "take
> this vCPU which has started up and run once, and put it back
> into PSCI power-off" ?
>
> [*] this is pretty tedious, since it involves reading every CPU
> register on the vCPU before first run in order to feed the kernel
> back a bunch of info it already knows about the reset state of
> a vCPU.
>
So, from looking at the code and the API specification calling
KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT does exactly this and also resets all core and cp15
registers for you - you would here be able to set the power-off flag and
pause those CPUs so PSCI can wake them up again.
Am I missing something here?
This makes me wonder if it's worth adding to
Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt that KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT should be
called on all VCPUs before running any of the VCPUs...
-Christoffer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-20 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-20 18:51 [PATCH] arm: KVM: Don't return PSCI_INVAL if waitqueue is inactive Christoffer Dall
2013-11-20 18:51 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-11-20 19:12 ` Peter Maydell
2013-11-20 19:12 ` Peter Maydell
2013-11-20 19:21 ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
2013-11-20 19:21 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-11-20 19:27 ` Peter Maydell
2013-11-20 19:27 ` Peter Maydell
2013-11-20 19:37 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-11-20 19:37 ` Christoffer Dall
[not found] ` <20131211205315.GH2871@cbox>
[not found] ` <52A98074.9080103@arm.com>
2013-12-12 20:09 ` Christoffer Dall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131120192102.GF9314@cbox \
--to=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.