Re: /proc/vmcore mmap() failure issue

[Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 05:31:46PM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote:

[..]
> > So I think the patch I sent is enough, the policy will be simpler as
> > "Don't use mmap() for buggy kernels".
> > 
> > [PATCH] Fall back to read() when mmap() fails.
> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/2013-November/010199.html
> > 
> 
> I think logic becomes not so complex. For example, if input vmcore
> format is ELF, then:
> 
> o in update_mmap_range():
>   - first calculate a range of the corresponding PT_LOAD entry truncated with
>     PAGE_SIZE.
>   - Then, truncate range of mmap() by the truncated range of the corresponding
>     PT_LOAD entry, i.e., exlucde partial pages from mmap() target range.
>   - Then determine offsets of two partial pages; the number of partial pages
>     are always at most two. The offsets can easily be calculated from the
>     original range of the corresponding PT_LOAD entry
> 
> o in read_from_vmcore(), if a given offset belongs to either of two partial
>   pages, then go to read() path; if not, go to mmap() path.

I agree that we should do mmap() on all non-partial pages and do read()
on all partial pages. Otherwise we lose the benefit of faster speed of
mmap().

Thanks
Vivek

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec