From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
Andrew Victor <linux@maxim.org.za>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: atmel_serial: include <mach/hardware.h> explicitly
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 17:42:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131127164215.GS28642@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131127100243.GQ28642@pengutronix.de>
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:02:43AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:48:19AM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> > On 27/11/2013 10:38, Uwe Kleine-König :
> > >When compiled for at91rm9200 (i.e. ARM) the driver needs among others
> > >the symbol AT91RM9200_BASE_US0 which is defined in
> > >arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91rm9200.h. This file is included
> > >implicitly via several steps. As ARM's <asm/timex.h> will stop including
> > ><mach/hardware.h> later in this series explicitly include
> > ><mach/hardware.h>
> > >
> > >Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> >
> > Uwe, this AT91RM9200_BASE_US0 value is supposed to disappear in 3.14
> > tanks to a patch from Linus W. ([PATCH v4] ARM/serial: at91: switch
> > atmel serial to use gpiolib) (not in linux-next yet).
> >
> > So I think that this patch is not needed for 3.14.
> So I'll keep this patch in my queue for now, but keep an eye on this
> one. The other symbols were dropped, too?
I just verified that Linus W.'s patch is good enough for me.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] tty: atmel_serial: include <mach/hardware.h> explicitly
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 17:42:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131127164215.GS28642@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131127100243.GQ28642@pengutronix.de>
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:02:43AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:48:19AM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> > On 27/11/2013 10:38, Uwe Kleine-K?nig :
> > >When compiled for at91rm9200 (i.e. ARM) the driver needs among others
> > >the symbol AT91RM9200_BASE_US0 which is defined in
> > >arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91rm9200.h. This file is included
> > >implicitly via several steps. As ARM's <asm/timex.h> will stop including
> > ><mach/hardware.h> later in this series explicitly include
> > ><mach/hardware.h>
> > >
> > >Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> >
> > Uwe, this AT91RM9200_BASE_US0 value is supposed to disappear in 3.14
> > tanks to a patch from Linus W. ([PATCH v4] ARM/serial: at91: switch
> > atmel serial to use gpiolib) (not in linux-next yet).
> >
> > So I think that this patch is not needed for 3.14.
> So I'll keep this patch in my queue for now, but keep an eye on this
> one. The other symbols were dropped, too?
I just verified that Linus W.'s patch is good enough for me.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-27 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-27 9:38 [PATCH] tty: atmel_serial: include <mach/hardware.h> explicitly Uwe Kleine-König
2013-11-27 9:38 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-11-27 9:48 ` Nicolas Ferre
2013-11-27 9:48 ` Nicolas Ferre
2013-11-27 10:02 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-11-27 10:02 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-11-27 16:42 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2013-11-27 16:42 ` Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131127164215.GS28642@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@maxim.org.za \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.