Re: [PATCH] Fix race between oom kill and task exit

[Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>]

On 11/28, Ma, Xindong wrote:
>
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -412,16 +412,6 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *p, gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,
>  	static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(oom_rs, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL,
>  					      DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST);
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * If the task is already exiting, don't alarm the sysadmin or kill
> -	 * its children or threads, just set TIF_MEMDIE so it can die quickly
> -	 */
> -	if (p->flags & PF_EXITING) {
> -		set_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_MEMDIE);
> -		put_task_struct(p);
> -		return;
> -	}
> -
>  	if (__ratelimit(&oom_rs))
>  		dump_header(p, gfp_mask, order, memcg, nodemask);
>  
> @@ -437,6 +427,16 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *p, gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,
>  	 * still freeing memory.
>  	 */
>  	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> +	/*
> +	 * If the task is already exiting, don't alarm the sysadmin or kill
> +	 * its children or threads, just set TIF_MEMDIE so it can die quickly
> +	 */
> +	if (p->flags & PF_EXITING) {
> +		set_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_MEMDIE);
> +		put_task_struct(p);
> +		read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> +		return;
> +	}

I got lost... didn't we recently discussed the similar patch from Sameer?

This one doesn't look right. find_lock_task_mm() after unlock(tasklist)
can hit the same problem.

I belive the patch from Sameer was correct.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>