From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Lior Amsalem <alior@marvell.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
Patch Tracking <patches@linaro.org>,
Tim Kryger <tim.kryger@linaro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
ARM Kernel List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] serial: 8250_dw: Improve unwritable LCR workaround
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 16:47:21 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131128194720.GD13182@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131128093034.5d61130a@skate>
Hi Thomas, Tim:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 09:30:34AM +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear Ezequiel Garcia,
>
> On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 15:54:49 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
>
> > > An external device may be keeping the UART busy and preventing LCR
> > > from being written.
> > >
> > > What device is attached to ttyS1?
> >
> > There's no device attached at ttyS1. I've just tested this in another
> > box and it seems the same error is obtained on each unused port:
>
> Are you sure about this? I suppose you're testing on the Armada XP GP
> board, and this board has a 4 ports FTDI chip, and according to the
> board schematics the four UARTs are all connected to the FTDI chip. So
> from the SoC perspective, ttyS1 is connected to something, as far as I
> can understand. Or maybe you also tested Armada XP DB ?
>
Yeah, sorry about that. I missed the FTDI chip. As Thomas says the XP GP
board I'm testing this on, has its four UARTs connected to a FTDI chip.
Changing the console port by setting "console=ttyS1,115200" gives this:
[..]
Serial: 8250/16550 driver, 4 ports, IRQ sharing enabled
dw-apb-uart d0012000.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 191
dw-apb-uart d0012000.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 191
dw-apb-uart d0012000.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 224
dw-apb-uart d0012000.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 224
d0012000.serial: ttyS0 at MMIO 0xd0012000 (irq = 17, base_baud = 15625000) is a 16550A
dw-apb-uart d0012100.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 191
dw-apb-uart d0012100.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 191
dw-apb-uart d0012100.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 224
dw-apb-uart d0012100.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 224
d0012100.serial: ttyS1 at MMIO 0xd0012100 (irq = 18, base_baud = 15625000) is a 16550A
console [ttyS1] enabled
dw-apb-uart d0012200.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 191
dw-apb-uart d0012200.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 191
dw-apb-uart d0012200.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 224
dw-apb-uart d0012200.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 224
d0012200.serial: ttyS2 at MMIO 0xd0012200 (irq = 31, base_baud = 15625000) is a 16550A
dw-apb-uart d0012300.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 191
dw-apb-uart d0012300.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 191
dw-apb-uart d0012300.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 224
dw-apb-uart d0012300.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 224
d0012300.serial: ttyS3 at MMIO 0xd0012300 (irq = 32, base_baud = 15625000) is a 16550A
So we get the "Couldn't set" message in all four ports.
Tim: Any ideas?
--
Ezequiel García, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com (Ezequiel Garcia)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] serial: 8250_dw: Improve unwritable LCR workaround
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 16:47:21 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131128194720.GD13182@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131128093034.5d61130a@skate>
Hi Thomas, Tim:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 09:30:34AM +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear Ezequiel Garcia,
>
> On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 15:54:49 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
>
> > > An external device may be keeping the UART busy and preventing LCR
> > > from being written.
> > >
> > > What device is attached to ttyS1?
> >
> > There's no device attached at ttyS1. I've just tested this in another
> > box and it seems the same error is obtained on each unused port:
>
> Are you sure about this? I suppose you're testing on the Armada XP GP
> board, and this board has a 4 ports FTDI chip, and according to the
> board schematics the four UARTs are all connected to the FTDI chip. So
> from the SoC perspective, ttyS1 is connected to something, as far as I
> can understand. Or maybe you also tested Armada XP DB ?
>
Yeah, sorry about that. I missed the FTDI chip. As Thomas says the XP GP
board I'm testing this on, has its four UARTs connected to a FTDI chip.
Changing the console port by setting "console=ttyS1,115200" gives this:
[..]
Serial: 8250/16550 driver, 4 ports, IRQ sharing enabled
dw-apb-uart d0012000.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 191
dw-apb-uart d0012000.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 191
dw-apb-uart d0012000.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 224
dw-apb-uart d0012000.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 224
d0012000.serial: ttyS0 at MMIO 0xd0012000 (irq = 17, base_baud = 15625000) is a 16550A
dw-apb-uart d0012100.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 191
dw-apb-uart d0012100.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 191
dw-apb-uart d0012100.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 224
dw-apb-uart d0012100.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 224
d0012100.serial: ttyS1 at MMIO 0xd0012100 (irq = 18, base_baud = 15625000) is a 16550A
console [ttyS1] enabled
dw-apb-uart d0012200.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 191
dw-apb-uart d0012200.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 191
dw-apb-uart d0012200.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 224
dw-apb-uart d0012200.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 224
d0012200.serial: ttyS2 at MMIO 0xd0012200 (irq = 31, base_baud = 15625000) is a 16550A
dw-apb-uart d0012300.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 191
dw-apb-uart d0012300.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 191
dw-apb-uart d0012300.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 224
dw-apb-uart d0012300.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 224
d0012300.serial: ttyS3 at MMIO 0xd0012300 (irq = 32, base_baud = 15625000) is a 16550A
So we get the "Couldn't set" message in all four ports.
Tim: Any ideas?
--
Ezequiel Garc?a, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Tim Kryger <tim.kryger@linaro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Patch Tracking <patches@linaro.org>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
Lior Amsalem <alior@marvell.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
ARM Kernel List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] serial: 8250_dw: Improve unwritable LCR workaround
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 16:47:21 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131128194720.GD13182@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131128093034.5d61130a@skate>
Hi Thomas, Tim:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 09:30:34AM +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear Ezequiel Garcia,
>
> On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 15:54:49 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
>
> > > An external device may be keeping the UART busy and preventing LCR
> > > from being written.
> > >
> > > What device is attached to ttyS1?
> >
> > There's no device attached at ttyS1. I've just tested this in another
> > box and it seems the same error is obtained on each unused port:
>
> Are you sure about this? I suppose you're testing on the Armada XP GP
> board, and this board has a 4 ports FTDI chip, and according to the
> board schematics the four UARTs are all connected to the FTDI chip. So
> from the SoC perspective, ttyS1 is connected to something, as far as I
> can understand. Or maybe you also tested Armada XP DB ?
>
Yeah, sorry about that. I missed the FTDI chip. As Thomas says the XP GP
board I'm testing this on, has its four UARTs connected to a FTDI chip.
Changing the console port by setting "console=ttyS1,115200" gives this:
[..]
Serial: 8250/16550 driver, 4 ports, IRQ sharing enabled
dw-apb-uart d0012000.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 191
dw-apb-uart d0012000.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 191
dw-apb-uart d0012000.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 224
dw-apb-uart d0012000.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 224
d0012000.serial: ttyS0 at MMIO 0xd0012000 (irq = 17, base_baud = 15625000) is a 16550A
dw-apb-uart d0012100.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 191
dw-apb-uart d0012100.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 191
dw-apb-uart d0012100.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 224
dw-apb-uart d0012100.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 224
d0012100.serial: ttyS1 at MMIO 0xd0012100 (irq = 18, base_baud = 15625000) is a 16550A
console [ttyS1] enabled
dw-apb-uart d0012200.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 191
dw-apb-uart d0012200.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 191
dw-apb-uart d0012200.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 224
dw-apb-uart d0012200.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 224
d0012200.serial: ttyS2 at MMIO 0xd0012200 (irq = 31, base_baud = 15625000) is a 16550A
dw-apb-uart d0012300.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 191
dw-apb-uart d0012300.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 191
dw-apb-uart d0012300.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 224
dw-apb-uart d0012300.serial: Couldn't set LCR to 224
d0012300.serial: ttyS3 at MMIO 0xd0012300 (irq = 32, base_baud = 15625000) is a 16550A
So we get the "Couldn't set" message in all four ports.
Tim: Any ideas?
--
Ezequiel García, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-28 19:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-01 17:18 [PATCH v2] serial: 8250_dw: Improve unwritable LCR workaround Tim Kryger
2013-10-02 9:47 ` Heikki Krogerus
2013-11-26 18:36 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-11-26 18:36 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-11-26 18:36 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-11-26 23:03 ` Tim Kryger
2013-11-26 23:03 ` Tim Kryger
2013-11-26 23:03 ` Tim Kryger
2013-11-27 18:54 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-11-27 18:54 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-11-27 18:54 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-11-28 2:46 ` Tim Kryger
2013-11-28 2:46 ` Tim Kryger
2013-11-28 8:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-11-28 8:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-11-28 19:47 ` Ezequiel Garcia [this message]
2013-11-28 19:47 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-11-28 19:47 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-11-28 19:53 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-11-28 19:53 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-11-28 19:53 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-12-04 13:01 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-12-04 13:01 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-12-04 13:01 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-12-04 18:56 ` Tim Kryger
2013-12-04 18:56 ` Tim Kryger
2013-12-04 18:56 ` Tim Kryger
2013-12-06 23:29 ` James Hogan
2013-12-06 23:29 ` James Hogan
2013-12-06 23:51 ` James Hogan
2013-12-06 23:51 ` James Hogan
2013-12-07 0:31 ` Tim Kryger
2013-12-07 0:31 ` Tim Kryger
2013-12-07 0:59 ` James Hogan
2013-12-07 0:59 ` James Hogan
2013-12-10 0:42 ` Tim Kryger
2013-12-10 0:42 ` Tim Kryger
2013-12-10 12:11 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-12-10 12:11 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-12-10 12:11 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-12-10 22:48 ` James Hogan
2013-12-10 22:48 ` James Hogan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131128194720.GD13182@localhost \
--to=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
--cc=alior@marvell.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=tim.kryger@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.