From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
LinusW <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] ASoC: ux500: Store DMA data in the DAI differently in the pdata and DT case
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 14:03:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131202140324.GH31626@lee--X1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131202135452.GI27568@sirena.org.uk>
On Mon, 02 Dec 2013, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 10:12:56AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > It's actually my fault. I had two patches round the wrong way in the
> > series. The imediately subsequent patch in the set fixes this issue:
>
> OK, so what do we do about this? Is there going to be a revision of
> that patch adding the note about not using the autoconfiguration stuff
> and what (if any) are the dependencies on the arch/arm changes?
I can shoot out a revision no problem.
I'm not aware of any dependencies on the ARM changes. I haven't tested
the arch/arm and sound/soc adaptions orthogonally, but I _think_ the
right decisions should be made depending on the information passed
from platform/dt code.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 07/10] ASoC: ux500: Store DMA data in the DAI differently in the pdata and DT case
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 14:03:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131202140324.GH31626@lee--X1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131202135452.GI27568@sirena.org.uk>
On Mon, 02 Dec 2013, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 10:12:56AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > It's actually my fault. I had two patches round the wrong way in the
> > series. The imediately subsequent patch in the set fixes this issue:
>
> OK, so what do we do about this? Is there going to be a revision of
> that patch adding the note about not using the autoconfiguration stuff
> and what (if any) are the dependencies on the arch/arm changes?
I can shoot out a revision no problem.
I'm not aware of any dependencies on the ARM changes. I haven't tested
the arch/arm and sound/soc adaptions orthogonally, but I _think_ the
right decisions should be made depending on the information passed
from platform/dt code.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
LinusW <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 07/10] ASoC: ux500: Store DMA data in the DAI differently in the pdata and DT case
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 14:03:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131202140324.GH31626@lee--X1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131202135452.GI27568@sirena.org.uk>
On Mon, 02 Dec 2013, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 10:12:56AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > It's actually my fault. I had two patches round the wrong way in the
> > series. The imediately subsequent patch in the set fixes this issue:
>
> OK, so what do we do about this? Is there going to be a revision of
> that patch adding the note about not using the autoconfiguration stuff
> and what (if any) are the dependencies on the arch/arm changes?
I can shoot out a revision no problem.
I'm not aware of any dependencies on the ARM changes. I haven't tested
the arch/arm and sound/soc adaptions orthogonally, but I _think_ the
right decisions should be made depending on the information passed
from platform/dt code.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-02 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-19 11:07 [PATCH 00/10] ASoC: dma: ARM: ux500: Obtain DMA data from Device Tree Lee Jones
2013-11-19 11:07 ` Lee Jones
2013-11-19 11:07 ` [PATCH 01/10] dma: ste_dma40: Expand DT binding to accept 'high-priority channel' flag Lee Jones
2013-11-19 11:07 ` Lee Jones
2013-11-19 11:07 ` Lee Jones
2013-11-19 21:02 ` Linus Walleij
2013-11-19 21:02 ` Linus Walleij
2013-11-19 11:07 ` [PATCH 02/10] dma: ste_dma40: Parse flags property for new 'high priority channel' request Lee Jones
2013-11-19 11:07 ` Lee Jones
2013-11-19 21:03 ` Linus Walleij
2013-11-19 21:03 ` Linus Walleij
2013-11-19 11:07 ` [PATCH 03/10] ARM: ux500: Don't use enums for MSP IDs - for easy DT conversion Lee Jones
2013-11-19 11:07 ` Lee Jones
2013-11-19 11:07 ` [PATCH 04/10] ARM: ux500: Add DMA config bindings for MSP devices Lee Jones
2013-11-19 11:07 ` Lee Jones
2013-11-19 21:06 ` Linus Walleij
2013-11-19 21:06 ` Linus Walleij
2013-11-19 11:07 ` [PATCH 05/10] ASoC: Ux500: Match platform by device node when booting Device Tree Lee Jones
2013-11-19 11:07 ` Lee Jones
2013-11-19 11:07 ` Lee Jones
2013-11-19 18:49 ` Mark Brown
2013-11-19 18:49 ` Mark Brown
2013-11-19 11:07 ` [PATCH 06/10] ASoC: ux500_pcm: Extend Device Tree support to deal with DMA data Lee Jones
2013-11-19 11:07 ` Lee Jones
2013-11-19 18:50 ` Mark Brown
2013-11-19 18:50 ` Mark Brown
2013-11-19 11:07 ` [PATCH 07/10] ASoC: ux500: Store DMA data in the DAI differently in the pdata and DT case Lee Jones
2013-11-19 11:07 ` Lee Jones
2013-11-19 11:07 ` Lee Jones
2013-11-19 18:51 ` Mark Brown
2013-11-19 18:51 ` Mark Brown
2013-12-02 7:35 ` [alsa-devel] " Olof Johansson
2013-12-02 7:35 ` Olof Johansson
2013-12-02 10:12 ` Lee Jones
2013-12-02 10:12 ` [alsa-devel] " Lee Jones
2013-12-02 10:12 ` Lee Jones
2013-12-02 13:54 ` Mark Brown
2013-12-02 13:54 ` Mark Brown
2013-12-02 14:03 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2013-12-02 14:03 ` Lee Jones
2013-12-02 14:03 ` Lee Jones
2013-12-02 14:04 ` Mark Brown
2013-12-02 14:04 ` Mark Brown
2013-12-02 14:04 ` Mark Brown
2013-12-04 17:45 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-12-04 17:45 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-12-04 18:03 ` Lee Jones
2013-12-04 18:03 ` Lee Jones
2013-12-04 18:03 ` Lee Jones
2013-11-19 11:07 ` [PATCH 08/10] ASoC: ux500_pcm: Differentiate between pdata and DT initialisation Lee Jones
2013-11-19 11:07 ` Lee Jones
2013-11-19 18:48 ` Mark Brown
2013-11-19 18:48 ` Mark Brown
2013-11-19 19:33 ` Lee Jones
2013-11-19 19:33 ` Lee Jones
2013-11-19 19:40 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2013-11-19 19:40 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2013-11-19 20:09 ` Mark Brown
2013-11-19 20:09 ` Mark Brown
2013-11-19 11:07 ` [PATCH 09/10] ASoC: ux500_pcm: Take out pointless dev_dbg() call Lee Jones
2013-11-19 11:07 ` Lee Jones
2013-11-19 18:51 ` Mark Brown
2013-11-19 18:51 ` Mark Brown
2013-11-19 11:07 ` [PATCH 10/10] ASoC: ux500: Dynamically fill DAI driver data on probe Lee Jones
2013-11-19 11:07 ` Lee Jones
2013-11-19 18:53 ` [PATCH 00/10] ASoC: dma: ARM: ux500: Obtain DMA data from Device Tree Mark Brown
2013-11-19 18:53 ` Mark Brown
2013-11-29 16:03 ` Lee Jones
2013-11-29 16:03 ` Lee Jones
2013-11-29 16:42 ` Mark Brown
2013-11-29 16:42 ` Mark Brown
2013-11-29 17:37 ` Lee Jones
2013-11-29 17:37 ` Lee Jones
2013-11-29 18:21 ` Mark Brown
2013-11-29 18:21 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131202140324.GH31626@lee--X1 \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.