From: ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com (Ville Syrjälä)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] drm: Add LCD display clock polarity flags
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 10:51:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131203085113.GQ10036@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF6AEGtgsqea_FkkH6EaA_yg_a12A4vdw6ASr9+GGWgU2HEdGg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 03:32:30PM -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 04:39:26PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> Add DRM flags for the LCD display clock polarity so the pixelclk-active DT
> >> property can be properly handled by drivers using the DRM API.
> >
> > I still say that not even this should be part of the DRM mode API to
> > userspace. The hint that you're changing the user API is that you're
> > modifying a header file below a 'uapi' directory.
> >
> > The settings of double scan, sync polarity etc are all part of the
> > display mode specification (check CEA-861 documents). Things like
> > pixel clock polarity are not part of the mode specification, they're
> > a property of the display itself and are independent of the mode.
> >
> > Therefore, they should not be part of struct drm_mode_modeinfo.
>
> Note that we could make them part of drm_display_mode (but
> drm_crtc_convert_to_umode() should filter them out when copying from
> drm_mode_modeinfo.. I agree this information should not be coming from
> userspace). Seems like the sort of thing that the bridge or encoder
> could set on the adjusted_mode.
Probably better to not mix user visible and internal flags in
drm_display_mode.flags. Just makes it more difficult to add
real flags. Maybe just stick them into private_flags for the
drivers that care.
--
Ville Syrj?l?
Intel OTC
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm: Add LCD display clock polarity flags
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 10:51:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131203085113.GQ10036@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF6AEGtgsqea_FkkH6EaA_yg_a12A4vdw6ASr9+GGWgU2HEdGg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 03:32:30PM -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 04:39:26PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> Add DRM flags for the LCD display clock polarity so the pixelclk-active DT
> >> property can be properly handled by drivers using the DRM API.
> >
> > I still say that not even this should be part of the DRM mode API to
> > userspace. The hint that you're changing the user API is that you're
> > modifying a header file below a 'uapi' directory.
> >
> > The settings of double scan, sync polarity etc are all part of the
> > display mode specification (check CEA-861 documents). Things like
> > pixel clock polarity are not part of the mode specification, they're
> > a property of the display itself and are independent of the mode.
> >
> > Therefore, they should not be part of struct drm_mode_modeinfo.
>
> Note that we could make them part of drm_display_mode (but
> drm_crtc_convert_to_umode() should filter them out when copying from
> drm_mode_modeinfo.. I agree this information should not be coming from
> userspace). Seems like the sort of thing that the bridge or encoder
> could set on the adjusted_mode.
Probably better to not mix user visible and internal flags in
drm_display_mode.flags. Just makes it more difficult to add
real flags. Maybe just stick them into private_flags for the
drivers that care.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-03 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-02 15:39 [PATCH 1/3] drm: Add LCD display clock polarity flags Marek Vasut
2013-12-02 15:39 ` Marek Vasut
2013-12-02 15:39 ` [PATCH 2/3] imx-drm: ipuv3-crtc: Make DISP_CLK polarity configurable Marek Vasut
2013-12-02 15:39 ` Marek Vasut
2013-12-02 15:39 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: imx53: Switch DISP_CLK polarity on M53EVK Marek Vasut
2013-12-02 15:39 ` Marek Vasut
2013-12-02 20:01 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm: Add LCD display clock polarity flags Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-12-02 20:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-12-02 20:32 ` Rob Clark
2013-12-02 20:32 ` Rob Clark
2013-12-03 8:51 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2013-12-03 8:51 ` Ville Syrjälä
2013-12-02 23:42 ` Marek Vasut
2013-12-02 23:42 ` Marek Vasut
2013-12-03 11:44 ` Shawn Guo
2013-12-03 11:44 ` Shawn Guo
2013-12-03 12:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-12-03 12:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-12-09 10:55 ` Marek Vasut
2013-12-09 10:55 ` Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131203085113.GQ10036@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.