From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm/smp: Make boot_secondary() static
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 18:04:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201401031804.34124.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1388763959-27491-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org>
On Friday 03 January 2014, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@linux-m68k.org>
>
> After becoming a mandatory function, boot_secondary() is no longer used
> outside arch/arm/kernel/smp.c. Hence make it static.
> The code is reshuffled a bit to avoid a forward declaration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@linux-m68k.org>
How about taking it one step further by removing the function entirely?
Like this:
@@ -92,6 +92,9 @@ int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
{
int ret;
+ if (!smp_ops.smp_boot_secondary)
+ return -ENOSYS;
+
/*
* We need to tell the secondary core where to find
* its stack and the page tables.
@@ -111,7 +114,7 @@ int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
/*
* Now bring the CPU into our world.
*/
- ret = boot_secondary(cpu, idle);
+ ret = smp_ops.smp_boot_secondary(cpu, idle);
if (ret == 0) {
/*
* CPU was successfully started, wait for it
I guess we could do the same for some of the other operations as well
if everyone likes the approach.
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@linux-m68k.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm/smp: Make boot_secondary() static
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 18:04:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201401031804.34124.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1388763959-27491-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org>
On Friday 03 January 2014, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@linux-m68k.org>
>
> After becoming a mandatory function, boot_secondary() is no longer used
> outside arch/arm/kernel/smp.c. Hence make it static.
> The code is reshuffled a bit to avoid a forward declaration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@linux-m68k.org>
How about taking it one step further by removing the function entirely?
Like this:
@@ -92,6 +92,9 @@ int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
{
int ret;
+ if (!smp_ops.smp_boot_secondary)
+ return -ENOSYS;
+
/*
* We need to tell the secondary core where to find
* its stack and the page tables.
@@ -111,7 +114,7 @@ int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
/*
* Now bring the CPU into our world.
*/
- ret = boot_secondary(cpu, idle);
+ ret = smp_ops.smp_boot_secondary(cpu, idle);
if (ret == 0) {
/*
* CPU was successfully started, wait for it
I guess we could do the same for some of the other operations as well
if everyone likes the approach.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-03 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-03 15:45 [PATCH] arm/smp: Make boot_secondary() static Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-01-03 15:45 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-01-03 17:04 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2014-01-03 17:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-03 18:24 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-01-03 18:24 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-01-03 18:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-03 18:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201401031804.34124.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.