From: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
To: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>,
Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
Cc: dchinner@fromorbit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: Calling destroy_work_on_stack() to pair with INIT_WORK_ONSTACK()
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 13:34:00 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140107193400.GC1935@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52CBE321.4050906@oracle.com>
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 07:21:05PM +0800, Jeff Liu wrote:
> Hi Chuansheng,
>
> On 01/07 2014 16:53 PM, Chuansheng Liu wrote:
> >
> > In case CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_WORK is defined, it is needed to
> > call destroy_work_on_stack() which frees the debug object to pair
> > with INIT_WORK_ONSTACK().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Liu, Chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
> > ---
> > fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
> > index 1394106..82e0dab 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
> > @@ -287,6 +287,7 @@ xfs_bmapi_allocate(
> > INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&args->work, xfs_bmapi_allocate_worker);
> > queue_work(xfs_alloc_wq, &args->work);
> > wait_for_completion(&done);
> > + destroy_work_on_stack(&args->work);
> > return args->result;
> > }
>
> Thanks for your patch and it work fine for my testing. I missed this in an
> old commit: [ 3b876c8f2a xfs: fix debug_object WARN at xfs_alloc_vextent() ]
Looks good to me too.
Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
To: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>,
Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
Cc: dchinner@fromorbit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: Calling destroy_work_on_stack() to pair with INIT_WORK_ONSTACK()
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 13:34:00 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140107193400.GC1935@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52CBE321.4050906@oracle.com>
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 07:21:05PM +0800, Jeff Liu wrote:
> Hi Chuansheng,
>
> On 01/07 2014 16:53 PM, Chuansheng Liu wrote:
> >
> > In case CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_WORK is defined, it is needed to
> > call destroy_work_on_stack() which frees the debug object to pair
> > with INIT_WORK_ONSTACK().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Liu, Chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
> > ---
> > fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
> > index 1394106..82e0dab 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
> > @@ -287,6 +287,7 @@ xfs_bmapi_allocate(
> > INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&args->work, xfs_bmapi_allocate_worker);
> > queue_work(xfs_alloc_wq, &args->work);
> > wait_for_completion(&done);
> > + destroy_work_on_stack(&args->work);
> > return args->result;
> > }
>
> Thanks for your patch and it work fine for my testing. I missed this in an
> old commit: [ 3b876c8f2a xfs: fix debug_object WARN at xfs_alloc_vextent() ]
Looks good to me too.
Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-07 19:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-07 8:50 [PATCH 1/3] workqueue: Calling destroy_work_on_stack() to pair with INIT_WORK_ONSTACK() Chuansheng Liu
2014-01-07 8:53 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: " Chuansheng Liu
2014-01-07 8:53 ` Chuansheng Liu
2014-01-07 11:21 ` Jeff Liu
2014-01-07 11:21 ` Jeff Liu
2014-01-07 19:34 ` Ben Myers [this message]
2014-01-07 19:34 ` Ben Myers
2014-01-08 0:57 ` Liu, Chuansheng
2014-01-08 0:57 ` Liu, Chuansheng
2014-01-07 8:56 ` [PATCH 3/3] dm snapshot: " Chuansheng Liu
2014-01-07 15:44 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-01-12 3:27 ` [PATCH 1/3] workqueue: " Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140107193400.GC1935@sgi.com \
--to=bpm@sgi.com \
--cc=chuansheng.liu@intel.com \
--cc=dchinner@fromorbit.com \
--cc=jeff.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.