All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	Benoit Cousson <bcousson@baylibre.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	dt list <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
	linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/2] ARM: OMAP2+/dts: standardize SoC naming
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 11:18:47 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140108191846.GE31323@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGo_u6o+Lcf0wzmsSir1APd4T3A4D+GPtdRmkBM79mjW2aEGHA@mail.gmail.com>

* Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> [140106 16:49]:
> Hi Benoit, Tony,
> 
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> wrote:
> > Originally attempted partially in [1], the missing binding were
> > reported as part of Rob's report in [2].
> 
> Would you like me to send this series again since I do not see this in:
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/bcousson/linux-omap-dt.git/log/?h=for_3.14/dts

No need to and sorry for the delays. I'm applying these into
omap-for-v3.14/fixes-not-urgent as they should not conflict with
other DT related patches.

Regards,

Tony
 
> patchwork links:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3286051/
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3286061/
> 
> >
> > So, here is take two of the series, lacking an standard causes issues
> > that was fixed such as [3]. Ideally, we should never again introduce a
> > board file without a exact compatible SoC match.
> >
> > I have stayed a bit away from updating board and SoC dts files yet
> > to look at the direction we'd like to go here. If we feel things are
> > good, I would gladly try to clean our mess up.
> >
> > Nishanth Menon (2):
> >   Documentation: dt: OMAP: explicitly state SoC compatible strings
> >   ARM: OMAP2+: board-generic: update SoC compatibility strings
> >
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/omap.txt          |   53 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c                |    7 +++
> >  2 files changed, 60 insertions(+)
> >
> > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2998201/
> > [2] http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=138378029113665&w=2
> > [3] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3279281/
> >
> > --
> > 1.7.9.5
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V2 0/2] ARM: OMAP2+/dts: standardize SoC naming
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 11:18:47 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140108191846.GE31323@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGo_u6o+Lcf0wzmsSir1APd4T3A4D+GPtdRmkBM79mjW2aEGHA@mail.gmail.com>

* Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> [140106 16:49]:
> Hi Benoit, Tony,
> 
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> wrote:
> > Originally attempted partially in [1], the missing binding were
> > reported as part of Rob's report in [2].
> 
> Would you like me to send this series again since I do not see this in:
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/bcousson/linux-omap-dt.git/log/?h=for_3.14/dts

No need to and sorry for the delays. I'm applying these into
omap-for-v3.14/fixes-not-urgent as they should not conflict with
other DT related patches.

Regards,

Tony
 
> patchwork links:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3286051/
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3286061/
> 
> >
> > So, here is take two of the series, lacking an standard causes issues
> > that was fixed such as [3]. Ideally, we should never again introduce a
> > board file without a exact compatible SoC match.
> >
> > I have stayed a bit away from updating board and SoC dts files yet
> > to look at the direction we'd like to go here. If we feel things are
> > good, I would gladly try to clean our mess up.
> >
> > Nishanth Menon (2):
> >   Documentation: dt: OMAP: explicitly state SoC compatible strings
> >   ARM: OMAP2+: board-generic: update SoC compatibility strings
> >
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/omap.txt          |   53 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c                |    7 +++
> >  2 files changed, 60 insertions(+)
> >
> > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2998201/
> > [2] http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=138378029113665&w=2
> > [3] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3279281/
> >
> > --
> > 1.7.9.5
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-08 19:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-05  0:49 [PATCH V2 0/2] ARM: OMAP2+/dts: standardize SoC naming Nishanth Menon
2013-12-05  0:49 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-12-05  0:49 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-12-05  0:49 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] Documentation: dt: OMAP: explicitly state SoC compatible strings Nishanth Menon
2013-12-05  0:49   ` Nishanth Menon
2013-12-05  0:49   ` Nishanth Menon
2013-12-05  0:49 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] ARM: OMAP2+: board-generic: update SoC compatibility strings Nishanth Menon
2013-12-05  0:49   ` Nishanth Menon
2013-12-05  0:49   ` Nishanth Menon
2014-01-07  0:47 ` [PATCH V2 0/2] ARM: OMAP2+/dts: standardize SoC naming Nishanth Menon
2014-01-07  0:47   ` Nishanth Menon
2014-01-08 19:18   ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2014-01-08 19:18     ` Tony Lindgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140108191846.GE31323@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=bcousson@baylibre.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    --cc=rob@landley.net \
    --cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.