From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
edumazet@google.com, darren@dvhart.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
sbw@mit.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/timers 4/4] timers: Reduce future __run_timers() latency for first add to empty list
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 18:24:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140115172409.GD11499@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1389763248-31297-4-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 01/14, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> @@ -749,6 +749,7 @@ __mod_timer(struct timer_list *timer, unsigned long expires,
>
> base = lock_timer_base(timer, &flags);
>
> + (void)catchup_timer_jiffies(base);
Agreed, but perhaps it would be better to do this before
all_timers++ in internal_add_timer() ?
This is funny, but I already have the same change for ->next_timer,
if we add this optimization perhaps that trivial patch makes sense
too.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-15 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-15 5:19 [PATCH v2 tip/core/timers] Crude timer-wheel latency hacks Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-15 5:20 ` [PATCH tip/core/timers 1/4] timers: Track total number of timers in list Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-15 5:20 ` [PATCH tip/core/timers 2/4] timers: Reduce __run_timers() latency for empty list Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-15 17:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-01-15 17:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-16 2:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-15 17:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-01-15 20:32 ` Josh Triplett
2014-01-15 20:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-01-16 2:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-15 20:33 ` Josh Triplett
2014-01-16 2:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-15 5:20 ` [PATCH tip/core/timers 3/4] timers: Reduce future __run_timers() latency for newly emptied list Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-15 17:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-01-16 2:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-15 20:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-01-15 23:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-15 5:20 ` [PATCH tip/core/timers 4/4] timers: Reduce future __run_timers() latency for first add to empty list Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-15 17:24 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2014-01-15 17:31 ` [PATCH 0/1] timers: internal_add_timer() should update ->next_timer if ->active_timers == 0 Oleg Nesterov
2014-01-15 17:31 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2014-01-15 20:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-01-16 2:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-16 2:33 ` [PATCH tip/core/timers 4/4] timers: Reduce future __run_timers() latency for first add to empty list Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-15 22:22 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/timers] Crude timer-wheel latency hacks Thomas Gleixner
2014-01-16 2:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140115172409.GD11499@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sbw@mit.edu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.