All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
	niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
	dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, darren@dvhart.com,
	fweisbec@gmail.com, sbw@mit.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/timers 2/4] timers: Reduce __run_timers() latency for empty list
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 18:22:51 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140116022251.GP10038@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140115154710.4281c978@gandalf.local.home>

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 03:47:10PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 12:32:45 -0800
> Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 06:38:58PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > > forgot to mention...
> > > 
> > > On 01/14, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +static bool catchup_timer_jiffies(struct tvec_base *base)
> > > > +{
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
> > > > +	if (!base->all_timers) {
> > > > +		base->timer_jiffies = jiffies;
> > > > +		return 1;
> > > > +	}
> > > > +#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL */
> > > > +	return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > 
> > > Do we really want ifdef?
> > > 
> > > This check is cheap, and !CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL case looks a bit
> > > strange because we still update ->all_timers for no reason.
> > 
> > There's an easy way to improve this: instead of using an ifdef, put
> > "IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) && " in the if condition.
> 
> Why even bother with that? What's wrong with doing this check all the
> time? Looks like it will save of the normal case too.

Sold!  I removed the ifdef.

							Thanx, Paul


  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-16  2:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-15  5:19 [PATCH v2 tip/core/timers] Crude timer-wheel latency hacks Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-15  5:20 ` [PATCH tip/core/timers 1/4] timers: Track total number of timers in list Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-15  5:20   ` [PATCH tip/core/timers 2/4] timers: Reduce __run_timers() latency for empty list Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-15 17:03     ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-01-15 17:10       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-16  2:14       ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-15 17:38     ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-01-15 20:32       ` Josh Triplett
2014-01-15 20:47         ` Steven Rostedt
2014-01-16  2:22           ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2014-01-15 20:33     ` Josh Triplett
2014-01-16  2:23       ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-15  5:20   ` [PATCH tip/core/timers 3/4] timers: Reduce future __run_timers() latency for newly emptied list Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-15 17:08     ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-01-16  2:23       ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-15 20:54     ` Steven Rostedt
2014-01-15 23:41       ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-15  5:20   ` [PATCH tip/core/timers 4/4] timers: Reduce future __run_timers() latency for first add to empty list Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-15 17:24     ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-01-15 17:31       ` [PATCH 0/1] timers: internal_add_timer() should update ->next_timer if ->active_timers == 0 Oleg Nesterov
2014-01-15 17:31         ` [PATCH 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2014-01-15 20:56           ` Steven Rostedt
2014-01-16  2:10           ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-16  2:33       ` [PATCH tip/core/timers 4/4] timers: Reduce future __run_timers() latency for first add to empty list Paul E. McKenney
2014-01-15 22:22 ` [PATCH v2 tip/core/timers] Crude timer-wheel latency hacks Thomas Gleixner
2014-01-16  2:36   ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140116022251.GP10038@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=darren@dvhart.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sbw@mit.edu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.