All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, penberg@kernel.org,
	cl@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/9] mm: slab/slub: use page->list consistently instead of page->lru
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 02:11:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140116001141.GA8456@node.dhcp.inet.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140114180044.1E401C47@viggo.jf.intel.com>

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:00:44AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> 
> From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> 
> 'struct page' has two list_head fields: 'lru' and 'list'.
> Conveniently, they are unioned together.  This means that code
> can use them interchangably, which gets horribly confusing like
> with this nugget from slab.c:
> 
> >	list_del(&page->lru);
> >	if (page->active == cachep->num)
> >		list_add(&page->list, &n->slabs_full);
> 
> This patch makes the slab and slub code use page->lru
> universally instead of mixing ->list and ->lru.
> 
> So, the new rule is: page->lru is what the you use if you want to
> keep your page on a list.  Don't like the fact that it's not
> called ->list?  Too bad.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, penberg@kernel.org,
	cl@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/9] mm: slab/slub: use page->list consistently instead of page->lru
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 02:11:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140116001141.GA8456@node.dhcp.inet.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140114180044.1E401C47@viggo.jf.intel.com>

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:00:44AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> 
> From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> 
> 'struct page' has two list_head fields: 'lru' and 'list'.
> Conveniently, they are unioned together.  This means that code
> can use them interchangably, which gets horribly confusing like
> with this nugget from slab.c:
> 
> >	list_del(&page->lru);
> >	if (page->active == cachep->num)
> >		list_add(&page->list, &n->slabs_full);
> 
> This patch makes the slab and slub code use page->lru
> universally instead of mixing ->list and ->lru.
> 
> So, the new rule is: page->lru is what the you use if you want to
> keep your page on a list.  Don't like the fact that it's not
> called ->list?  Too bad.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-01-16  0:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-14 18:00 [RFC][PATCH 0/9] re-shrink 'struct page' when SLUB is on Dave Hansen
2014-01-14 18:00 ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-14 18:00 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/9] mm: slab/slub: use page->list consistently instead of page->lru Dave Hansen
2014-01-14 18:00   ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-14 19:31   ` Christoph Lameter
2014-01-14 19:31     ` Christoph Lameter
2014-01-15  2:31   ` David Rientjes
2014-01-15  2:31     ` David Rientjes
2014-01-15  6:58     ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-15  6:58       ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-15  7:16       ` David Rientjes
2014-01-15  7:16         ` David Rientjes
2014-01-16  0:11   ` Kirill A. Shutemov [this message]
2014-01-16  0:11     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-01-14 18:00 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/9] mm: slub: abstract out double cmpxchg option Dave Hansen
2014-01-14 18:00   ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-14 19:49   ` Christoph Lameter
2014-01-14 19:49     ` Christoph Lameter
2014-01-14 21:41     ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-14 21:41       ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-15  2:37       ` David Rientjes
2014-01-15  2:37         ` David Rientjes
2014-01-16 16:45       ` Christoph Lameter
2014-01-16 16:45         ` Christoph Lameter
2014-01-16 17:13         ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-16 17:13           ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-14 18:00 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/9] mm: page->pfmemalloc only used by slab/skb Dave Hansen
2014-01-14 18:00   ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-14 19:49   ` Christoph Lameter
2014-01-14 19:49     ` Christoph Lameter
2014-01-14 22:17     ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-14 22:17       ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-15  2:45       ` David Rientjes
2014-01-15  2:45         ` David Rientjes
2014-01-16  0:16   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-01-16  0:16     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-01-14 18:00 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/9] mm: slabs: reset page at free Dave Hansen
2014-01-14 18:00   ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-15  2:48   ` David Rientjes
2014-01-15  2:48     ` David Rientjes
2014-01-16 18:35     ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-16 18:35       ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-16 18:32   ` Christoph Lameter
2014-01-16 18:32     ` Christoph Lameter
2014-01-14 18:00 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/9] mm: rearrange struct page Dave Hansen
2014-01-14 18:00   ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-16  0:20   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-01-16  0:20     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-01-16 18:34   ` Christoph Lameter
2014-01-16 18:34     ` Christoph Lameter
2014-01-16 22:29     ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-16 22:29       ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-17 14:58       ` Christoph Lameter
2014-01-17 14:58         ` Christoph Lameter
2014-01-14 18:01 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/9] mm: slub: rearrange 'struct page' fields Dave Hansen
2014-01-14 18:01   ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-14 18:01 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/9] mm: slub: remove 'struct page' alignment restrictions Dave Hansen
2014-01-14 18:01   ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-14 18:01 ` [RFC][PATCH 8/9] mm: slub: cleanups after code churn Dave Hansen
2014-01-14 18:01   ` Dave Hansen
2014-01-14 18:01 ` [RFC][PATCH 9/9] mm: fix alignment checks on 32-bit Dave Hansen
2014-01-14 18:01   ` Dave Hansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140116001141.GA8456@node.dhcp.inet.fi \
    --to=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave@sr71.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.