From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/4 v3] mfd: tc3589x: Add device tree bindings
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:13:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140121171313.GC27111@lee--X1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZoEwgRALT0R8vWB1aWxR_WCR2U0b1yF0Mr0qNm0LDGug@mail.gmail.com>
> > This defines the device tree bindings for the Toshiba TC3589x
> > series of multi-purpose expanders. Only the stuff I can test
> > is defined: GPIO and keypad. Others may implement more
> > subdevices further down the road.
> >
> > This is to complement
> > commit a435ae1d51e2f18414f2a87219fdbe068231e692
> > "mfd: Enable the tc3589x for Device Tree" which left off
> > the definition of the device tree bindings.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > ChangeLog v2->v3:
> > - Fix the keys/rows bindings to be u32 rather than
> > /bits/ 8, inconsistency noted by Mark Rutland.
> > ChangeLog v1->v2:
> > - Include a verbose example in the DT bindings.
> > - Explain why this is a stand-alone bindings patch.
>
> So will this since Nov 12 uncommented-upon patch be merged or
> do you want me to do some change?
>
> There was some back-and-forth regarding the (existing, already
> in use) linux-specific input bindings but the only thing I can
> see is some back and forth leaning toward just letting these
> be used.
We still need a DT Ack.
> I am happy to change this in whatever way but no directions
> for two months....
If it had slipped though the gaps, I'd probably suggest poking or
re-sending before the middle of the merge-window though.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4 v3] mfd: tc3589x: Add device tree bindings
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:13:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140121171313.GC27111@lee--X1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZoEwgRALT0R8vWB1aWxR_WCR2U0b1yF0Mr0qNm0LDGug@mail.gmail.com>
> > This defines the device tree bindings for the Toshiba TC3589x
> > series of multi-purpose expanders. Only the stuff I can test
> > is defined: GPIO and keypad. Others may implement more
> > subdevices further down the road.
> >
> > This is to complement
> > commit a435ae1d51e2f18414f2a87219fdbe068231e692
> > "mfd: Enable the tc3589x for Device Tree" which left off
> > the definition of the device tree bindings.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > ChangeLog v2->v3:
> > - Fix the keys/rows bindings to be u32 rather than
> > /bits/ 8, inconsistency noted by Mark Rutland.
> > ChangeLog v1->v2:
> > - Include a verbose example in the DT bindings.
> > - Explain why this is a stand-alone bindings patch.
>
> So will this since Nov 12 uncommented-upon patch be merged or
> do you want me to do some change?
>
> There was some back-and-forth regarding the (existing, already
> in use) linux-specific input bindings but the only thing I can
> see is some back and forth leaning toward just letting these
> be used.
We still need a DT Ack.
> I am happy to change this in whatever way but no directions
> for two months....
If it had slipped though the gaps, I'd probably suggest poking or
re-sending before the middle of the merge-window though.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-21 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-12 14:12 [PATCH 1/4 v3] mfd: tc3589x: Add device tree bindings Linus Walleij
2013-11-12 14:12 ` Linus Walleij
2013-11-12 14:12 ` Linus Walleij
2014-01-21 13:35 ` Linus Walleij
2014-01-21 13:35 ` Linus Walleij
2014-01-21 17:13 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2014-01-21 17:13 ` Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140121171313.GC27111@lee--X1 \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.