All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/22] Rewrite XIP code and add XIP support to ext4
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 18:53:56 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140123075356.GM13997@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140123074825.GL13997@dastard>

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 06:48:25PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 08:24:18PM -0500, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > This series of patches add support for XIP to ext4.  Unfortunately,
> > it turns out to be necessary to rewrite the existing XIP support code
> > first due to races that are unfixable in the current design.
> > 
> > Since v4 of this patchset, I've improved the documentation, fixed a
> > couple of warnings that a newer version of gcc emitted, and fixed a
> > bug where we would read/write the wrong address for I/Os that were not
> > aligned to PAGE_SIZE.
> > 
> > I've dropped the PMD fault patch from this set since there are some
> > places where we would need to split a PMD page and there's no way to do
> > that right now.  In its place, I've added a patch which attempts to add
> > support for unwritten extents.  I'm still in two minds about this; on the
> > one hand, it's clearly a win for reads and writes.  On the other hand,
> > it adds a lot of complexity, and it probably isn't a win for pagefaults.
> 
> FYI, this may just be pure coincidence, but shortly after the first
> boot of a machine with this patchset on 3.13 the root *ext3*
> filesystem started having problems.  It now gives persistent ENOSPC
> errors when there's 2.3GB of space free (on a 8GB partition), even
> though e2fsck says the filesystem is clean and error free.
> 
> Fmeh.
> 
> Update: I've just removed the patchset, rebuilt the kernel and the
> ENOSPC problem is still there. So it may be co-incidence, but given
> that it is persistent something is screwed got screwed up in the
> filesytem.

OK, false alarm - it is co-incidence. The damn root filesystem ran
out of inodes. Can you beleive that you're only allowed 600k inodes
in an 8GB filesystems? Sheesh! :)

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/22] Rewrite XIP code and add XIP support to ext4
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 18:53:56 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140123075356.GM13997@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140123074825.GL13997@dastard>

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 06:48:25PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 08:24:18PM -0500, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > This series of patches add support for XIP to ext4.  Unfortunately,
> > it turns out to be necessary to rewrite the existing XIP support code
> > first due to races that are unfixable in the current design.
> > 
> > Since v4 of this patchset, I've improved the documentation, fixed a
> > couple of warnings that a newer version of gcc emitted, and fixed a
> > bug where we would read/write the wrong address for I/Os that were not
> > aligned to PAGE_SIZE.
> > 
> > I've dropped the PMD fault patch from this set since there are some
> > places where we would need to split a PMD page and there's no way to do
> > that right now.  In its place, I've added a patch which attempts to add
> > support for unwritten extents.  I'm still in two minds about this; on the
> > one hand, it's clearly a win for reads and writes.  On the other hand,
> > it adds a lot of complexity, and it probably isn't a win for pagefaults.
> 
> FYI, this may just be pure coincidence, but shortly after the first
> boot of a machine with this patchset on 3.13 the root *ext3*
> filesystem started having problems.  It now gives persistent ENOSPC
> errors when there's 2.3GB of space free (on a 8GB partition), even
> though e2fsck says the filesystem is clean and error free.
> 
> Fmeh.
> 
> Update: I've just removed the patchset, rebuilt the kernel and the
> ENOSPC problem is still there. So it may be co-incidence, but given
> that it is persistent something is screwed got screwed up in the
> filesytem.

OK, false alarm - it is co-incidence. The damn root filesystem ran
out of inodes. Can you beleive that you're only allowed 600k inodes
in an 8GB filesystems? Sheesh! :)

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-23  7:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-16  1:24 [PATCH v5 00/22] Rewrite XIP code and add XIP support to ext4 Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 01/22] Fix XIP fault vs truncate race Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24   ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 02/22] Allow page fault handlers to perform the COW Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24   ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 03/22] axonram: Fix bug in direct_access Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24   ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 04/22] Change direct_access calling convention Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24   ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 05/22] Introduce IS_XIP(inode) Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24   ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 06/22] Treat XIP like O_DIRECT Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24   ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-31 16:59   ` Jan Kara
2014-01-31 16:59     ` Jan Kara
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 07/22] Rewrite XIP page fault handling Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24   ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 08/22] Change xip_truncate_page to take a get_block parameter Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24   ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24   ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 09/22] Remove mm/filemap_xip.c Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24   ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 10/22] Remove get_xip_mem Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24   ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:46   ` Randy Dunlap
2014-01-16  1:46     ` Randy Dunlap
2014-01-27 13:26     ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-27 13:26       ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 11/22] Replace ext2_clear_xip_target with xip_clear_blocks Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24   ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 12/22] ext2: Remove ext2_xip_verify_sb() Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24   ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 13/22] ext2: Remove ext2_use_xip Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24   ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 14/22] ext2: Remove xip.c and xip.h Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24   ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 15/22] Remove CONFIG_EXT2_FS_XIP Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24   ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 16/22] ext2: Remove ext2_aops_xip Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24   ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 17/22] xip: Add xip_zero_page_range Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24   ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 18/22] ext4: Make ext4_block_zero_page_range static Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24   ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 19/22] ext4: Add XIP functionality Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24   ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 20/22] ext4: Fix typos Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24   ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 21/22] xip: Add reporting of major faults Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24   ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24 ` [PATCH v5 22/22] XIP: Add support for unwritten extents Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-16  1:24   ` Matthew Wilcox
     [not found] ` <CEFDA737.22F87%matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>
2014-01-17  0:00   ` [PATCH v5 19/22] ext4: Add XIP functionality Ross Zwisler
2014-01-17  0:00     ` Ross Zwisler
     [not found] ` <CEFD7DAD.22F65%matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>
2014-01-22 22:51   ` [PATCH v5 22/22] XIP: Add support for unwritten extents Ross Zwisler
2014-01-22 22:51     ` Ross Zwisler
2014-01-23 12:08     ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-23 12:08       ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-23 19:13       ` Ross Zwisler
2014-01-23 19:13         ` Ross Zwisler
     [not found]     ` <CF0C370C.235F1%willy@linux.intel.com>
2014-01-27 23:32       ` Ross Zwisler
2014-01-27 23:32         ` Ross Zwisler
2014-01-28  3:49         ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-28  3:49           ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-01-23  7:48 ` [PATCH v5 00/22] Rewrite XIP code and add XIP support to ext4 Dave Chinner
2014-01-23  7:48   ` Dave Chinner
2014-01-23  7:53   ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2014-01-23  7:53     ` Dave Chinner
2014-01-23  9:01 ` Dave Chinner
2014-01-23  9:01   ` Dave Chinner
2014-01-23 12:12   ` Wilcox, Matthew R
2014-01-23 12:12     ` Wilcox, Matthew R
2014-01-28  6:06     ` Dave Chinner
2014-01-28  6:06       ` Dave Chinner
2014-01-30  6:42 ` Dave Chinner
2014-01-30  6:42   ` Dave Chinner
2014-01-30  9:25   ` Dave Chinner
2014-01-30  9:25     ` Dave Chinner
2014-01-31  3:06     ` Dave Chinner
2014-01-31  3:06       ` Dave Chinner
2014-01-31  5:45       ` Ross Zwisler
2014-01-31  5:45         ` Ross Zwisler
2014-01-31 13:04         ` Dave Chinner
2014-01-31 13:04           ` Dave Chinner
     [not found] ` <CF1FF3EB.24114%matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>
2014-02-11 23:12   ` [PATCH v5 19/22] ext4: Add XIP functionality Ross Zwisler
2014-02-11 23:12     ` Ross Zwisler
2014-02-13  0:00     ` Ross Zwisler
2014-02-13  0:00       ` Ross Zwisler
     [not found] ` <CF215477.24281%matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>
2014-02-12 23:53   ` [PATCH v5 06/22] Treat XIP like O_DIRECT Ross Zwisler
2014-02-12 23:53     ` Ross Zwisler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140123075356.GM13997@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.