Re: [PATCH 1/4] memblock: memblock_virt_alloc_internal(): alloc from specified node only

[Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>]

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:27:45PM -0500, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> From: Luiz capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
> 
> If an allocation from the node specified by the nid argument fails,
> memblock_virt_alloc_internal() automatically tries to allocate memory
> from other nodes.
> 
> This is fine is the caller don't care which node is going to allocate
> the memory. However, there are cases where the caller wants memory to
> be allocated from the specified node only. If that's not possible, then
> memblock_virt_alloc_internal() should just fail.
> 
> This commit adds a new flags argument to memblock_virt_alloc_internal()
> where the caller can control this behavior.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luiz capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
> ---
>  mm/memblock.c | 10 +++++++---
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index 39a31e7..b0c7b2e 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -1028,6 +1028,8 @@ phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_try_nid(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, i
>  	return memblock_alloc_base(size, align, MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE);
>  }
>  
> +#define ALLOC_SPECIFIED_NODE_ONLY 0x1
> +

It's not a perfect fit but you could use gfp_t and GFP_THISNODE. The
meaning of the flag is recognised and while you are not using it with a
page allocator, we already use GFP flags with the slab allocator without
confusion.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>