From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
Doug Thompson <dougthompson@xmission.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] EDAC: Correct workqueue setup path
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 18:22:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140212172254.GI5121@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140212163644.GG5121@pd.tnic>
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
We're using edac_mc_workq_setup() both on the init path, when
we load an edac driver and when we change the polling period
(edac_mc_reset_delay_period) through /sys/.../edac_mc_poll_msec.
On that second path we don't need to init the workqueue which has been
initialized already.
Thanks to Tejun for workqueue insights.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
---
drivers/edac/edac_mc.c | 11 +++++++----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
index aef5ec24908e..33edd6766344 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c
@@ -559,7 +559,8 @@ static void edac_mc_workq_function(struct work_struct *work_req)
*
* called with the mem_ctls_mutex held
*/
-static void edac_mc_workq_setup(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, unsigned msec)
+static void edac_mc_workq_setup(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, unsigned msec,
+ bool init)
{
edac_dbg(0, "\n");
@@ -567,7 +568,9 @@ static void edac_mc_workq_setup(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, unsigned msec)
if (mci->op_state != OP_RUNNING_POLL)
return;
- INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&mci->work, edac_mc_workq_function);
+ if (init)
+ INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&mci->work, edac_mc_workq_function);
+
mod_delayed_work(edac_workqueue, &mci->work, msecs_to_jiffies(msec));
}
@@ -611,7 +614,7 @@ void edac_mc_reset_delay_period(unsigned long value)
list_for_each(item, &mc_devices) {
mci = list_entry(item, struct mem_ctl_info, link);
- edac_mc_workq_setup(mci, value);
+ edac_mc_workq_setup(mci, value, false);
}
mutex_unlock(&mem_ctls_mutex);
@@ -782,7 +785,7 @@ int edac_mc_add_mc(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
/* This instance is NOW RUNNING */
mci->op_state = OP_RUNNING_POLL;
- edac_mc_workq_setup(mci, edac_mc_get_poll_msec());
+ edac_mc_workq_setup(mci, edac_mc_get_poll_msec(), true);
} else {
mci->op_state = OP_RUNNING_INTERRUPT;
}
--
1.8.5.2.192.g7794a68
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-12 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-03 20:05 [PATCH] edac, poll timeout cannot be zero Prarit Bhargava
2014-02-12 15:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-02-12 15:16 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-12 15:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-02-12 16:23 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-12 16:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-02-12 17:22 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140212172254.GI5121@pd.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dougthompson@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.