From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
Lior Amsalem <alior@marvell.com>,
Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik@marvell.com>,
Nadav Haklai <nadavh@marvell.com>,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/13] ARM: mvebu: remove the address parameter for ll_set_cpu_coherent
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:06:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140219170610.779573a2@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1392312816-17657-3-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Gregory,
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 18:33:25 +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> Until now the calling functions of ll_set_cpu_coherent() have to know
> the base address of the coherency registers. This commit doesn't
> expose anymore this address. This was needed to be able to use either
> a virtual or a physical address. This patch add a check of the MMU bit
> to choose the accurate address, then the calling function do have pass
> this information.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
I think your commit log needs some review:
I don't understand "This commit doesn't expose anymore this address."
from your commit log. Do you mean that the address is no longer passed
as argument to ll_set_cpu_coherent() ?
Similarly, the sentence "This patch add a check of the MMU bit to choose
the accurate address, then the calling function do have pass this
information." seems incorrect, as the commit does quite the opposite:
the calling function do *NOT* have to pass the base address of the
coherency.
Finally, your commit log doesn't explain *why* this change is
necessary. At first sight, switching from using a function argument to
a global variable looks like a step in the wrong direction. An
explanation as to why this is the right direction seems needed here.
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com (Thomas Petazzoni)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 02/13] ARM: mvebu: remove the address parameter for ll_set_cpu_coherent
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:06:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140219170610.779573a2@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1392312816-17657-3-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Gregory,
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 18:33:25 +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> Until now the calling functions of ll_set_cpu_coherent() have to know
> the base address of the coherency registers. This commit doesn't
> expose anymore this address. This was needed to be able to use either
> a virtual or a physical address. This patch add a check of the MMU bit
> to choose the accurate address, then the calling function do have pass
> this information.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
I think your commit log needs some review:
I don't understand "This commit doesn't expose anymore this address."
from your commit log. Do you mean that the address is no longer passed
as argument to ll_set_cpu_coherent() ?
Similarly, the sentence "This patch add a check of the MMU bit to choose
the accurate address, then the calling function do have pass this
information." seems incorrect, as the commit does quite the opposite:
the calling function do *NOT* have to pass the base address of the
coherency.
Finally, your commit log doesn't explain *why* this change is
necessary. At first sight, switching from using a function argument to
a global variable looks like a step in the wrong direction. An
explanation as to why this is the right direction seems needed here.
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-19 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-13 17:33 [PATCH v4 00/13] CPU idle for Armada XP Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-13 17:33 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-13 17:33 ` [PATCH v4 01/13] ARM: PJ4B: Add cpu_suspend/cpu_resume hooks for PJ4B Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-13 17:33 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-14 16:06 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-02-14 16:06 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-03-25 22:57 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-03-25 22:57 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-13 17:33 ` [PATCH v4 02/13] ARM: mvebu: remove the address parameter for ll_set_cpu_coherent Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-13 17:33 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-19 16:06 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2014-02-19 16:06 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-02-13 17:33 ` [PATCH v4 03/13] ARM: mvebu: ll_set_cpu_coherent always uses the current CPU Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-13 17:33 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-19 16:09 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-02-19 16:09 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-02-19 16:17 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-19 16:17 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-13 17:33 ` [PATCH v4 04/13] ARM: mvebu: Remove the unused argument of set_cpu_coherent() Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-13 17:33 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-19 16:27 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-02-19 16:27 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-02-13 17:33 ` [PATCH v4 05/13] ARM: mvebu: Low level function to disable HW coherency support Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-13 17:33 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-13 17:33 ` [PATCH v4 06/13] ARM: mvebu: Add a new set of registers for pmsu Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-13 17:33 ` Gregory CLEMENT
[not found] ` <1392312816-17657-1-git-send-email-gregory.clement-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2014-02-13 17:33 ` [PATCH v4 07/13] ARM: dts: mvebu: Add a new set of registers to the PMSU node Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-13 17:33 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-17 2:57 ` Jason Cooper
2014-02-17 2:57 ` Jason Cooper
[not found] ` <1392312816-17657-8-git-send-email-gregory.clement-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2014-02-19 16:00 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-02-19 16:00 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-02-19 17:49 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-19 17:49 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-19 18:21 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-02-19 18:21 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-02-13 17:33 ` [PATCH v4 08/13] ARM: mvebu: Allow to power down L2 cache controller in idle mode Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-13 17:33 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-13 17:33 ` [PATCH v4 09/13] ARM: mvebu: Add the PMSU related part of the cpu idle functions Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-13 17:33 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-13 17:33 ` [PATCH v4 10/13] ARM: mvebu: Set the start address of a CPU in a separate function Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-13 17:33 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-13 17:33 ` [PATCH v4 11/13] ARM: mvebu: Register notifier callback for the cpuidle transition Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-13 17:33 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-13 17:33 ` [PATCH v4 12/13] cpuidle: mvebu: Add initial CPU idle support for Armada 370/XP SoC Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-13 17:33 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-14 17:00 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-02-14 17:00 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-03-25 22:57 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-03-25 22:57 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-17 8:49 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-02-17 8:49 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-03-25 22:57 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-03-25 22:57 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-19 16:51 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-02-19 16:51 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-02-19 17:19 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-19 17:19 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-19 18:32 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-02-19 18:32 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-02-13 17:33 ` [PATCH v4 13/13] ARM: mvebu: register the cpuidle driver for the Armada XP SoCs Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-13 17:33 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-19 16:46 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-02-19 16:46 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-02-19 16:52 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-19 16:52 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-02-19 17:01 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-02-19 17:01 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140219170610.779573a2@skate \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=alior@marvell.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
--cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=nadavh@marvell.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
--cc=tawfik@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.