Re: [RFT][PATCH 0/2] Systemd 209

[Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1259 bytes --]

On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 06:12:10PM +0000, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-02-22 at 01:31 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> > builds might work but they won’t run and yes so far IFUNC support is needed so it won’t work on non-x86
> > architectures. One common runtime problem I am seeing is logind not being able to talk to dbus
> > across all architectures. I have pushed my latest rework to pull branch
> 
> What is the problem with ifunc on non-x86?  As far as I know the
> compiler, assembler, linker and ld.so for all reasonable architectures
> support that nowadays (though prelink support is a bit patchy).  GCC
> didn't have ifuncs enabled for some architectures until quite recently
> but if that was the problem then you'd see compile-time failures.  So,
> if it compiles then I can't think of any reason why it oughtn't to run.
> Is this a uclibc thing?

I'm seeing lots of compile errors like this:

| arm-oe-linux-gnueabi-libtool: link: arm-oe-linux-gnueabi-ranlib .libs/libsystemd-units.a
| libsystemd-id128.c:6:6: error: ifunc is not supported in this configuration
|  void sd_id128_to_string(void) __attribute__((ifunc("resolve_sd_id128_to_string")));
|       ^

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]